Have you registered for your free membership? If not, click here now to register!
 
 
Join Our Site - Its free, quick and easy!
Click Here to join.   Click Here for more information
Users Chatting None

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Performance, Engines and Troubleshooting > Performance and General Engine Building
Register - Join us, its Free! FAQ Members List Timeslips Calendar Mark Forums Read





Is F-150 Still King?


 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 10-10-2007, 10:42 PM
Junior User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Mt.Pleasant, Texas
Posts: 88
wayneF250 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Ford Racing "E 303" cam w/ SD EEC?

Does anybody run a E 303 cam, w/ a SD computer? How much Hell was it to tune? also how much HP can a MAF computer can stand, or better yet , when does the maf sensor start chokin down horsepower? The reason I ask, is I have a 94 f 250, w/ a "stroked" 408 ci, E 303 cam, 24 lb injectors, Performer RPM Edelbrock heads, Edelbrock 5.8 "truck" intake #3881, Motorvation Module and i'm on my 3rd chip, The tuner said" I will burn as many chips it will take to make it work". The only problem I have is . IT WONT IDLE , other than that its ok, I'm thinkin bout doin the SD to MAF swap, or goin to a aftermarket SD computer that is guarenteed to work, because then I can tune it myself, tThe motor is 400 hp, 400 torque will the maf choke any HP?
   
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
To remove this ad, register today!

  #2 (permalink)  
Old 10-10-2007, 11:10 PM
dragogt's Avatar
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: conroe tx
Posts: 1,938
dragogt has a very good reputation on FTE.dragogt has a very good reputation on FTE.dragogt has a very good reputation on FTE.dragogt has a very good reputation on FTE.
a maf swap or the aft mrkt kit, will make it a lot easer to tune, and will also give you more power. A SD computer needs a LSA of 114* one of the other guys can get a lot more specific then I can
__________________
92 Isuzu Rodeo 5sp 4x4
87 F150 lwb
83 bronco
86 mustang gt t-top
83 mustang gt

Aaron -STG's - Pirate Investigator

Quote:
Originally Posted by captain p4 View Post
If you can't tell if you have a body lift or not maybe you shouldn't be giving people advice in the offroad forum????
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 10-11-2007, 12:06 AM
Blurry94's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Calhoun GA
Posts: 2,417
Blurry94 has a good reputation on FTE.Blurry94 has a good reputation on FTE.Blurry94 has a good reputation on FTE.
It wont idle because it will not produce enough vacuum with that cam, at idle. Only easy remedy is to do a mass air swap or change the cam. I don't know what your tuner has tried thus far, but making changes to the injector slope, pulse and breakpoint could possibly get it to idle. However, you'll find that fueling will be all over the place at tip-in/out, and gas mileage will suffer.

In many cases the MAF is larger than the throttle body so it isn't an issue. However, on a N/A combo, the larger the inlet side, the better.
__________________
Matt C.
Supercharged, Intercooled and SCT/PRP tuned
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 10-11-2007, 09:57 AM
Conanski's Avatar
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 5,948
Conanski has a good reputation on FTE.Conanski has a good reputation on FTE.Conanski has a good reputation on FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by wayneF250
I have a 94 f 250, w/ a "stroked" 408 ci, E 303 cam, 24 lb injectors, Performer RPM Edelbrock heads, Edelbrock 5.8 "truck" intake #3881, Motorvation Module and i'm on my 3rd chip. The motor is 400 hp, 400 torque will the maf choke any HP?
No a 70mm or larger mass air meter will not restrict the motor, but that intake certainly will.
__________________
Paul O

1990 F150 4x4 XLT X-Cab 5.0, 3.55, Comp 35-349-8, Flowtech LT's to 3" single, FRPP Mass Air Conversion
Under construction: '85 351HO, Dart Iron Eagles, Roller Rockers, Typhoon intake, Crane 444232, 24lb Injectors, TweecerRT, Innovate LC-1 wideband O2
1990 Ranger 2wd, 2.3 Briggs & Stratten, 5-speed, 3.08 gears, sliding rear window.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 10-11-2007, 02:39 PM
Junior User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Mt.Pleasant, Texas
Posts: 88
wayneF250 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Hey thanks ya'll, thats kinda what I fugrued about the MAF , There seems to be people on both sides saying one is better SD to MAF, but if u think about it knowing how much air is coming in, seems better that a look up table when a motor is at a ceritn RPM and going by a programmed figure...........think i'm goin to MAF, I'll be sure to tell u the result !
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 10-11-2007, 02:42 PM
Junior User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Mt.Pleasant, Texas
Posts: 88
wayneF250 is starting off with a positive reputation.
another question, will there be a throttle response difference w/ MAF, and will I tell a difference w/ the SFI to the Bank firing injectors?
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 10-11-2007, 03:07 PM
dragogt's Avatar
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: conroe tx
Posts: 1,938
dragogt has a very good reputation on FTE.dragogt has a very good reputation on FTE.dragogt has a very good reputation on FTE.dragogt has a very good reputation on FTE.
throttle response should quicker (I think)
__________________
92 Isuzu Rodeo 5sp 4x4
87 F150 lwb
83 bronco
86 mustang gt t-top
83 mustang gt

Aaron -STG's - Pirate Investigator

Quote:
Originally Posted by captain p4 View Post
If you can't tell if you have a body lift or not maybe you shouldn't be giving people advice in the offroad forum????
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 10-11-2007, 03:31 PM
Conanski's Avatar
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 5,948
Conanski has a good reputation on FTE.Conanski has a good reputation on FTE.Conanski has a good reputation on FTE.
The MAF system can better adjust to the motor realtime, and it handles modifications more smoothly. It has been my experience that SEFI motors have better throttle response, but I don't know exactly what is responsible for that, could be the sequential injection, could be the fuel/spark curves, maybe it's a combination of both.
__________________
Paul O

1990 F150 4x4 XLT X-Cab 5.0, 3.55, Comp 35-349-8, Flowtech LT's to 3" single, FRPP Mass Air Conversion
Under construction: '85 351HO, Dart Iron Eagles, Roller Rockers, Typhoon intake, Crane 444232, 24lb Injectors, TweecerRT, Innovate LC-1 wideband O2
1990 Ranger 2wd, 2.3 Briggs & Stratten, 5-speed, 3.08 gears, sliding rear window.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 10-11-2007, 05:34 PM
dragogt's Avatar
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: conroe tx
Posts: 1,938
dragogt has a very good reputation on FTE.dragogt has a very good reputation on FTE.dragogt has a very good reputation on FTE.dragogt has a very good reputation on FTE.
that's what I was thinking I'm just not a FI buff, so was not for sure
__________________
92 Isuzu Rodeo 5sp 4x4
87 F150 lwb
83 bronco
86 mustang gt t-top
83 mustang gt

Aaron -STG's - Pirate Investigator

Quote:
Originally Posted by captain p4 View Post
If you can't tell if you have a body lift or not maybe you shouldn't be giving people advice in the offroad forum????
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 10-12-2007, 12:04 AM
Blurry94's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Calhoun GA
Posts: 2,417
Blurry94 has a good reputation on FTE.Blurry94 has a good reputation on FTE.Blurry94 has a good reputation on FTE.
The quicker throttle response is what I noticed first when I changed mine over. I was able to tune the SD system well enough to drive around, but I never got the fueling as accurate at the mass air combo I have now. I also had to store 2-3 programs with my speed density combo; for warmer and cooler temps.
__________________
Matt C.
Supercharged, Intercooled and SCT/PRP tuned
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 10-13-2007, 07:18 AM
Junior User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Mt.Pleasant, Texas
Posts: 88
wayneF250 is starting off with a positive reputation.
One more question, Did y'all see ana improvement in MPG w/ the MAF swap???
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 10-13-2007, 11:55 PM
Blurry94's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Calhoun GA
Posts: 2,417
Blurry94 has a good reputation on FTE.Blurry94 has a good reputation on FTE.Blurry94 has a good reputation on FTE.
Some have noted roughly 2mph improvement after a mass air swap. I haven't been able to see if there is any improvement because I can't keep my foot out of the throttle.
__________________
Matt C.
Supercharged, Intercooled and SCT/PRP tuned
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 10-23-2007, 09:24 PM
Senior User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Longwood, Fl
Posts: 478
benshere is starting off with a positive reputation.
Maf/sd

Was I lookin through my glass eye again or did you say MAF on a Speed Density system eec?
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 10-27-2007, 06:34 AM
Junior User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Mt.Pleasant, Texas
Posts: 88
wayneF250 is starting off with a positive reputation.
no, MAF or SD EEC, by the way , I'm doin my conversion to MAF in TWO weeks.........
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 10-27-2007, 10:24 AM
Senior User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Longwood, Fl
Posts: 478
benshere is starting off with a positive reputation.
Maf/sd

Good luck on the MAF conversion! For some reason I thought you were going to put a MAF meter on an SD---my bad. Sure would like to do the conversion myself. 93 bronco 351.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:39 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 1997-2008 Internet Brands, Inc.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - Jobs

Ford-Trucks.com and Internet Brands, Inc. are not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company.