1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Dentsides Ford Truck
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Moser

Difference between 351M and 351W

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 09-14-2007, 12:01 PM
SBrown732's Avatar
SBrown732
SBrown732 is offline
Freshman User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Peoria, IL
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question Difference between 351M and 351W

New to the big V8s and have seen discussions about both engines. What are the differences between the two and benefits for having one over the other?<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-comfficeffice" /><o></o>

<o></o>

Thanks,<o></o>

<o></o>

Steve
 
  #2  
Old 09-14-2007, 12:20 PM
Mil1ion's Avatar
Mil1ion
Mil1ion is offline
New User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
You can read about the differences in the related engine forums
https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/9...-and-351w.html
or this page

http://www.fordclassics.com/enginespecs.html

The 70's F-series trucks DIDN'T have 351W's in them so they don't really relate to this forum.

They were put in E-series Vans
 

Last edited by Mil1ion; 09-14-2007 at 12:26 PM.
  #3  
Old 09-14-2007, 01:38 PM
loudfords's Avatar
loudfords
loudfords is offline
FTE Chapter Leader

Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Beachville, Ontario
Posts: 3,828
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mil1ion
The 70's F-series trucks DIDN'T have 351W's in them so they don't really relate to this forum.
But they swap in really easily, thankfully.
 
  #4  
Old 09-14-2007, 06:41 PM
George Frasier's Avatar
George Frasier
George Frasier is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Kingsport, TN
Posts: 1,327
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Another difference is the 351M is like a de-stroked 400. Kind of like a 360 & 390
 
  #5  
Old 09-14-2007, 11:57 PM
masterbeavis's Avatar
masterbeavis
masterbeavis is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Eldorado Ca. USA
Posts: 3,312
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
351m have a bad reputation for being gutless, impossible to hop up, and gutless. Oh, I said gutless already. They dont make much power, but they can last for a long time.

The 351W is a good motor all around. I would take it over a 351M/400 any day.
 
  #6  
Old 09-15-2007, 08:25 AM
alxsnmr's Avatar
alxsnmr
alxsnmr is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: St Louis
Posts: 1,603
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
351M/400 was originally based on the 351c 2v. The biggest problem with it is that it received a bad rep at a time when most motors were making about the same horsepower numbers in cars. It lead to a rather small market for making the motors decent. The upside is that the 400 can use a majority of the 351c parts to make it so but the 351m is not so lucky, but a 400 crank with 400 pistons can give it the oppurtunity. Also, these engines were made at a time when leaded fuel was plentiful and requires hardened valves for the unleaded fuels available, not really a big deal. The 351M/400 late models used the 460 bellhousing for the transmission pattern but required a longer input shaft for manuals than the 460. Some early production 400 did recieve a dual pattern of the windsor/cleveland pattern as well as the 460 pattern. A good portion of the 351M/400 series were retarded at the timing chain from the factory. There was some claims that the demise of the engine at ford was because of the factory smog, which would have easily been corrected. I believe it simply was not a well received motor by the public, much like the problematic 6.0 diesel, so Ford just quit production and focused on the windsor blocks just to get rid of a problem child that could have been corrected easily.

I kind of liked the old 351M in my truck until it became so burned up that it would not run anymore with out smoking. Overall, it did its job with only minimal complaint and no rebuilding of it. I am thinking of a windsor swap simply because I would have access to overdrive transmissions with minimal need of checking clearances and computers for the E4OD. The only overdrives for the 460 were the ZF 5spd and the E4OD which would work on the 351M/400 but would require checking and modifying clearances for the flywheel and clutch to get it to work properly. It is kind of sad to consider a motor swap just to get access to different transmission options to get the old body to continue for another 20 years, but old metal never dies it just rusts away.
 
  #7  
Old 09-15-2007, 10:09 AM
tjc transport's Avatar
tjc transport
tjc transport is offline
i ain't rite
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Marlboro Mental Hospital.
Posts: 60,946
Received 3,090 Likes on 2,154 Posts
Originally Posted by masterbeavis
351m have a bad reputation for being gutless, impossible to hop up, and gutless. Oh, I said gutless already. They dont make much power, but they can last for a long time.

The 351W is a good motor all around. I would take it over a 351M/400 any day.
i don't know about the gutless part. the 351M in my 79 F250 4X4 will put the truck sideways in the road if you give it to much go pedal in turns, and roast the tires off it from a dead stop.

it has also been known to pull a 17,000 lb mini excavator all over the state of new jersey without complaining about anything except for a want for more gas in the tank.
 
  #8  
Old 09-15-2007, 05:35 PM
masterbeavis's Avatar
masterbeavis
masterbeavis is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Eldorado Ca. USA
Posts: 3,312
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by tjc transport
i don't know about the gutless part. the 351M in my 79 F250 4X4 will put the truck sideways in the road if you give it to much go pedal in turns, and roast the tires off it from a dead stop.

it has also been known to pull a 17,000 lb mini excavator all over the state of new jersey without complaining about anything except for a want for more gas in the tank.
Yeah, a 351M will roast the tires, if you dump the clutch at 4500 RPM, with hard skinny tires. A limited slip or a locker will cause cornering problems under power. Are you the orig. owner of the truck? My guess is that somebody did something to it...
 
  #9  
Old 09-15-2007, 06:10 PM
tjc transport's Avatar
tjc transport
tjc transport is offline
i ain't rite
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Marlboro Mental Hospital.
Posts: 60,946
Received 3,090 Likes on 2,154 Posts
i bought it 3 months old with 1500 miles on it. it has a C6 trans, and 12.5X33X16.5 tires on it, and the only thing i have ever done to it was put an edelbrock performer intake with a 600 cfm holley carb, and a 3 inch exhaust from the y pipe back on it back in 80 when i first got it.
 
  #10  
Old 09-15-2007, 07:43 PM
ArcadeTom's Avatar
ArcadeTom
ArcadeTom is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arcade, Georgia
Posts: 321
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by masterbeavis
Yeah, a 351M will roast the tires, if you dump the clutch at 4500 RPM, with hard skinny tires. A limited slip or a locker will cause cornering problems under power. Are you the orig. owner of the truck? My guess is that somebody did something to it...
My uncle had a 79 Bronco as well as a 78 F250 4x4 with the 351M in both. Uncle Lynn was always the one that had to pull everyone else out at the gravel pit and was also the one that coudl roast his "Power Cat" (remember those?) 38" mudders at will with no midifications more than dual exhausts. Ahhh...those were the days....$1.18 / gal gasoline...
My brother, on ht other hand had his '79 F250 CC (which did come with a 351W) that would not pull the hat off of your head. Yes I did confirm with both my brother and uncle about the motors in all 3. All three were bought new in Paris, TN by my brother and my uncle.
 
  #11  
Old 09-20-2007, 09:02 AM
nobodyspecial's Avatar
nobodyspecial
nobodyspecial is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: The Wilderness
Posts: 4,635
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
On our farm we have a 77 F250 351M, auto, 2WD, that has been run hard its whole life, and is still stock, its what I drove throughout highschool (i wasnt nice all the time.)

With close to 200000 hard miles on it, that thing will roast tires on demand, no questions asked. On the highway, I have had the needle pointing past straight down, coming up on 0 again. That thing flies. I have nothing but respect for that 351M, and while performance parts arent abundant, there are a still parts out there to wake them up more.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Snowlover
Explorer, Sport Trac, Mountaineer & Aviator
11
10-28-2014 07:11 AM
c-how
Excursion - King of SUVs
1
09-13-2012 09:10 PM
fly4fun35
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
16
02-20-2008 10:17 AM
starwriter
Ford Inline Six, 200, 250, 4.9L / 300
10
01-28-2008 02:12 AM
pforr
Excursion - King of SUVs
42
02-23-2007 01:38 AM



Quick Reply: Difference between 351M and 351W



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:37 PM.