Ford Truck Enthusiasts, The Internet's Leading Ford Trucks Resource, F150
 

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Performance, Engines and Troubleshooting > Ford V6 > 2.6, 2.8, 2.9, 4.0 and SOHC 4.0 V6
New! Use your Facebook, Google, AIM & Yahoo accounts to securely log into this site, click logo to login  






Is F-150 Still King?
 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 08-19-2007, 03:16 PM
rocker_topper rocker_topper is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 11
rocker_topper is starting off with a positive reputation.
Will These heads work???

Im replacing the heads on my 4.0L OHV v-6 in my explorer and i was wandering, i have the 90TM heads and was wandering would the 98TM heads work on my truck and if so would i get any better performance out of them versus the 90TM heads on my truck now???


Cologne V-6 Cylinder Heads
Head "name" intake
ports
exhaust
ports
Casting
Number
Comments
2.6 3 2 70TM Used on 1972-73 US-spec Capri I 2600. Apparently, it is also used on the 2.0 liter version, and I'd guess on the 2.3 as well. Some people like to put these heads on later 2.8 engines. Some people believe that the earlier 2.6 heads flow better. The 2.6 heads make it possible to fit the Kugelfischer fuel injection system used on the Capri RS-2600. These heads will not easily fit on the later 2.8 block however, due to water passage alignment problems.

Weslake 3 3 WRP 151 4001 Used on 1971-73 Capri RS-2600 race cars. These aluminum heads are extraordinarily rare, and similarly expensive. They will only work with the corresponding Weslake injection intake. Casting number is a Weslake code, not a Ford code.
2.8 non-smog 2 3 74TM Used on 1974 US-spec Capri I.
2.8 smog 2 3 75TM Used on 1976-77 US-spec Capri II.
2.8 European 3 2 79TM Used on 1979-86 European-spec Capri III.
Swaymar 3 3 79TM? A modification of the 2.8 European head, with the exhaust port "un-siamesed".
2.8 3 3 85TM Used in Sierra XR 4x4 and Scorpio=(Granada MK3 in UK) , circa 1986-87
2.9 (early) 3 3 86TM Used on 1986-1992 Ford Rangers and Ford Bronco IIs.
2.9 (Scorpio) 3 3 86TM Used on 1989 Ford (Merkur) Scorpios
2.9 (late) 2 3 89TM Used on mid 1988-1992 Ford Rangers and Ford Bronco IIs.
2.9 Cosworth DOHC ? Used on a few European Ford Scorpios. Many people have wondered whether these DOHC heads could be fitted to a 4.0 block. Sven Pruett has done it, and apparently he even made it work fairly well, but it took an enormous amount of effort to get it to work. Cosworth has also apparently done it with the FBD and FBF engines, but I don't know if these ever made it into production.
4.0 OHV 3 3 90TM Used on Ford Rangers and Explorers.
4.0 OHV 3 3 93TM Used on Ford Rangers and Explorers. Similar to 90TM, but said to be a stronger casting.
4.0 OHV 3 3 95TM Used on Ford Rangers and Explorers. The first of the "Small chamber" heads. Smooth intake port, old style exhaust port.
4.0 OHV 3 3 98TM Used on Ford Rangers and Explorers. A refinement of the 95TM head, it has smooth intake ports, small chambers, and round exhaust ports.
4.0 SOHC 3 3 97JM Single overhead cam version of the 4.0, Used on Ford Rangers, Explorers, and 2005 Mustangs.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 08-20-2007, 08:31 AM
TigerDan's Avatar
TigerDan TigerDan is online now
Super Moderator
1968 Ford F-250
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: The hills of No. Calif.
Posts: 10,220
TigerDan has a brilliant future TigerDan has a brilliant future TigerDan has a brilliant future TigerDan has a brilliant future TigerDan has a brilliant future TigerDan has a brilliant future TigerDan has a brilliant future TigerDan has a brilliant future TigerDan has a brilliant future TigerDan has a brilliant future TigerDan has a brilliant future
The exhaust ports on the 98TM heads are narrower than they were on the earlier castings. According to the engineers who designed these heads, the smaller ports increased the velocity of the exhaust gasses so they carried more heat down to the catalytic converter which would help the converter “light off" sooner to burn cleaner. With that in mind, it’s probably not a good idea to swap these heads with any of the earlier castings. Also, I think you have a change in the compression ratio due to the smaller chambers, possibly higher than you'd want. A better bet would be the 93TM castings.
__________________
FTE Moderator
Stop by and see us in the
Northern California Chapter!

"alot" is not a word...

Political Correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 08-20-2007, 10:40 PM
rocker_topper rocker_topper is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 11
rocker_topper is starting off with a positive reputation.
my goal is to raise the compression ration to about 12:1 but you say these heads will not work on my truck???
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 08-20-2007, 11:17 PM
TigerDan's Avatar
TigerDan TigerDan is online now
Super Moderator
1968 Ford F-250
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: The hills of No. Calif.
Posts: 10,220
TigerDan has a brilliant future TigerDan has a brilliant future TigerDan has a brilliant future TigerDan has a brilliant future TigerDan has a brilliant future TigerDan has a brilliant future TigerDan has a brilliant future TigerDan has a brilliant future TigerDan has a brilliant future TigerDan has a brilliant future TigerDan has a brilliant future
Not if you wanted to keep your truck in stock or near-stock configuration...but what are your goals with the truck? 12:1 is pretty high compression for a street driven truck. You wouldn't be able to run it on pump gas, that's race fuel territory.
__________________
FTE Moderator
Stop by and see us in the
Northern California Chapter!

"alot" is not a word...

Political Correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 08-23-2007, 09:45 PM
rocker_topper rocker_topper is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 11
rocker_topper is starting off with a positive reputation.
my idea is to get the compression ratio as high as i can and imgoing to be runnine 98 octane fuel.... um i want to bump the horsepower up to near 200... the motor stock has like 155 i believe and ive already got the heads off so i figure doign this and running the higher octane fuel should bump me up tosomewhere around 200.... unless you know an easier cheaper way to do this.... cause with the other heads i think i would have tochange my exhaust manifolds out correct?? and mabey my intake??? im not sure... anyways let me know what you think.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 08-29-2007, 03:22 AM
96_4wdr's Avatar
96_4wdr 96_4wdr is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Washington state
Posts: 4,850
96_4wdr is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
you'll never get the weak 4L OHV head to live long at 12:1 compression

drop in a late model 4.0L OHC/tranny and PCM
will gain 75 hp and 50 lbs/ft torque with mods

Last edited by 96_4wdr; 08-29-2007 at 03:25 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
86tm , 89tm , 98tm , cosworth , cylinder , fbf , ford , heads , versus

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:40 PM.

Guidelines - Contact Us - Ford Truck Enthusiasts - Archive - Top

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 1997-2008 Internet Brands, Inc.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. FordŽ is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.