Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Performance, Engines & Troubleshooting > Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?


Welcome to Ford-Trucks Forums!
Welcome to Ford-Trucks.com.

You are currently viewing our forums as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Ford-Trucks Forums community today!





 
Reply
 
 
 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 08-12-2007, 07:55 PM
ranger69f1 ranger69f1 is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Benton Ar
Posts: 24
ranger69f1 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Need engine ID help.

I grew up with Chevys and not too familiar with Fords, so don't flame me too bad. Here is the story........ I bought a 85 Bronco that had the bolwn 302 swapped out for a 95 302, or so I was told. The body was rotten so I pulled the motor to put in my Jeep. After cleaning it up I could tell it did'nt look like a 302. After trying the decoders it looks like a have a 74 3541W or a 71-79 400.

Here are the numbers.

Engine casting: D4AE-8015-AA-14
7811


Intake: E4TE-9425-BB


Heads: I assume the #'s are under the valve covers. I just put on gaskets (for a 95 302) and don't really want to pull them off, but I will if needed.

Thanks!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-12-2007, 10:24 PM
havi's Avatar
havi havi is offline
I'll have the Roast Duck
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Mental Ward room 48
Posts: 9,246
havi is a name known to allhavi is a name known to allhavi is a name known to allhavi is a name known to allhavi is a name known to allhavi is a name known to all
Havi Proprietor
count the number of valve cover bolts: 8 is a 351M/400..... 6 is a 302/351W. under the valve cover should be a date code, for example 4A6 (1974 January 6th)
__________________
1949 F6
1948 F1
1946 Tonner
The rest are just average.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-13-2007, 01:35 AM
Beanscoot Beanscoot is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 1,504
Beanscoot is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.Beanscoot is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
The 8015 must actually be 6015, as that's the basic block casting number. Therefore, inputting D4AE-6015-AA, Google search produces...

Ford D4AE 6015 AA 351W

From "Boucher's Racing Engines".

The intake manifold number indicates 1984, probably someone swapped this intake onto the older (1974+) engine, since the casting number indicates that it's a 4V.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-13-2007, 01:44 AM
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy NumberDummy is offline
Ford Parts Specialist
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Hacienda Heights CA
Posts: 54,689
NumberDummy has a superb reputationNumberDummy has a superb reputationNumberDummy has a superb reputationNumberDummy has a superb reputationNumberDummy has a superb reputationNumberDummy has a superb reputationNumberDummy has a superb reputationNumberDummy has a superb reputationNumberDummy has a superb reputationNumberDummy has a superb reputationNumberDummy has a superb reputation
Quote:
Originally Posted by ranger69f1
Intake: E4TE-9425-BB = E4TZ-9424-B 1984/85 351W 4V
The 8th digit in the VIN is the engine code. 1985 Bronco: F = 302 2V / N = 302 EFI / G = 351W

1970/79: Windsors only used in passenger cars and 1975/79 Econolines.

First 351W in F Series truck or Bronco = 1980.

351M/400 used in passenger cars through 1979. No further use of these engines after that year in cars.

351M/400 used in F Series trucks = 1977/82; in Bronco's = 1978/82; in Econolines = 1980/82. 1982 was the last year these engines were used...in anything.

351C/351M/400 = 8 valve cover bolts / 302/351W = 6 valve cover bolts.
__________________
Bill / Retired Ford Parts Manager / Part number research: 1928/2001 trucks & 1928/89 passenger cars.

2013 Escape FWD 2.0L Eco-Boost

Last edited by NumberDummy; 08-13-2007 at 02:33 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-13-2007, 03:56 AM
LxMan1's Avatar
LxMan1 LxMan1 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Louisville,Ky.
Posts: 22,229
LxMan1 has a brilliant futureLxMan1 has a brilliant futureLxMan1 has a brilliant futureLxMan1 has a brilliant futureLxMan1 has a brilliant futureLxMan1 has a brilliant futureLxMan1 has a brilliant futureLxMan1 has a brilliant futureLxMan1 has a brilliant futureLxMan1 has a brilliant futureLxMan1 has a brilliant future
looks like you have a 74 351W with an 84 intake.
__________________
Jimmy- FTE Moderator

88 5.0 LX Mustang
63 F100 351W/C6

Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-13-2007, 07:02 AM
baddad457 baddad457 is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: south louisiana
Posts: 6,595
baddad457 has a good reputation on FTE.baddad457 has a good reputation on FTE.baddad457 has a good reputation on FTE.
If you want the actual birth date of the block, look for the date code next to the casting numbers. This is a number/letter/number(s) combo. First number is the year of the decade it was cast (D=1970) the letter is the month, starting with "A" for January thru "M" for December, they skipped the letter "I". The last number or numbers is the day of the month it was cast. I agree with the others, it's not a 351M/400.
__________________
89 Ranger supercab-- 302-4bbl-- 4 speed 68 Mercury Monterey 390 4 bbl C-6 77 F100 400M C-6 67 Mustang fastback 427 2-4
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-13-2007, 07:44 AM
ranger69f1 ranger69f1 is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Benton Ar
Posts: 24
ranger69f1 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Thanks for the replies. 6 bolts on the valve covers. 351W it is.

Now next question. How good are these engines? HP? Low end torq? Durability? I've heard in the past that the Windsor is junk. I want to put it in my Jeep. Mostly off road and city. Very little highway. Good choice?

Edit: Also, what would be a good choice for a carb. It had a Holley 750 on it that was waaaaay to much. I want one that will run at steep angles off road. Motorcraft?

Last edited by ranger69f1; 08-13-2007 at 07:49 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-13-2007, 07:57 AM
HemiEater's Avatar
HemiEater HemiEater is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,656
HemiEater is starting off with a positive reputation.
it's a very good motor, just needs heads....ford kept the 302 heads instead of building new ones for the exrta cubes.

the carb is ok if you put heads on it or port the ones you have.....I would run a 600 edelbrock if you leave it stock.......
__________________
Whipple Survivor May 2008
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-13-2007, 08:25 AM
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski Conanski is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 20,240
Conanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud of
Quote:
Originally Posted by ranger69f1
Now next question. How good are these engines? HP? Low end torq? Durability? I've heard in the past that the Windsor is junk.
Let me guess.. it was a Chev guy that told you that... The engine is very durable and will make comparable HP and TQ to any other small block motor if properly equipped. The heads are somewhat restrictive but respond to porting and valve work, and the motor will need more cam than the competetion.. due to small port heads. the upside of the smaller ports is better than average low rpm TQ. Of course you can fix all that by straping on a better set of heads. The rotating assembly is good for 400+HP.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ranger69f1
Edit: Also, what would be a good choice for a carb. It had a Holley 750 on it that was waaaaay to much. I want one that will run at steep angles off road. Motorcraft?
Yeah.. 750 is way too much, 500-650cfm depending upon the cam.
__________________
Paul (Conan) O'Brien

1990 5.0HO AOD XLT X-Cab F150 3.55LS, 1994 3.0L 5-sp x-cab Ranger 3.45, 2004 3.0L 5-sp X-cab Ranger Edge 4.10, 2004 2.5L 5-spd Subaru Legacy
1996 Kawasaki ZX11D, 2004 Honda 599, 2008 Kawasaki KLR650

Last edited by Conanski; 08-13-2007 at 08:34 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-09-2013, 11:30 AM
71 F250 71 F250 is offline
Freshman User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Divide, CO
Posts: 34
71 F250 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Hi Bill, I'm hoping you can help me with some info on the E4TE-9425-BB manifold. What is the exhaust crossover control valve called and what is the part number? I got one for my 351w and the valve is good but if I need a replacement it has no part number on it. Finding any solid info has also proved difficult. I live at 9K in Colorado so this could be a good feature come winter. Thank you for so willingly sharing your vast knowledge and experience with us Ford Freaks!
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 09-09-2013, 01:18 PM
71 F250 71 F250 is offline
Freshman User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Divide, CO
Posts: 34
71 F250 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 71 F250 View Post
Hi Bill, I'm hoping you can help me with some info on the E4TE-9425-BB manifold. What is the exhaust crossover control valve called and what is the part number? I got one for my 351w and the valve is good but if I need a replacement it has no part number on it. Finding any solid info has also proved difficult. I live at 9K in Colorado so this could be a good feature come winter. Thank you for so willingly sharing your vast knowledge and experience with us Ford Freaks!
I actually found the part number from the local dealer parts department. After laughing about the obsolete part he told me it is called a intake manifold heat control assembly and is part number E4TZ-9G464A. Google search netted some NOS dealers that have them. Hope this helps others that have this question. I will connect it to a PVS6 from Standard Motor Products inb the thermostat housing so it will close the crossover at 90 degrees or so. FTE rocks!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2013, 01:18 PM
 
 
 
Reply

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Performance, Engines & Troubleshooting > Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)

Tags
1970, 1974, 1985, assemble, casting, d4ae, d4ae6015aa, d4ae6015aa7, engine, f100, f150, ford, id, identification, month, numbers, truck, vin

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Need help to choose the right pistons Cobra-Kai Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W) 13 04-01-2014 04:28 PM
All right, now really confused its a 351 firing on 302 order need help to ID heads reamer 1980 - 1986 Bullnose F100, F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 23 03-22-2014 12:38 PM
The Big Blue Bomb f150 302 to 351 swap Build thread BigBlueBomb 1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 21 02-28-2014 07:07 PM
93 F150 302 heads TurboFordJake 1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 12 05-18-2013 01:26 AM
Best factory heads for a 302 my4604x4 Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W) 10 11-18-2003 06:42 PM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 AC1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Statement - Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. FordŽ is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.

vbulletin Admin Backup