I know mine did. I had to break out the old Excel spreadsheet with all the calculations to verify the numbers. I guess sometimes I get a little carried away.

 

I thought it was a great exercise, with the only caveat being that I did not check the input bore and stroke numbers

I do think the 5.0 was called that to differentiate from the 4.9. I remember the Austin Healey 3000 (I had a '60 Mark I Healey a long time ago) had only 2912 cc of displacement.

George

 

6.8=Just Right

 

The person you are directing this to will never read it. They have not been on the site in over 6 years.

 

...Ha, ha! In all engine history, none of them are exactly as advertised.

 

Anybody got any more nits to pick?

 

My 351 Cleveland 2 bbl V8 felt/sounded stronger than my 6.8L V10.
I don't know if it was but it sure seemed to provide more and had better gas mileage.