Factory Ratings - 460
#16
The 460 is a phenomenal performer for what it is in stock condition. Mine has had some minor improvements, exhaust, heads reworked, MSD ignition, roller rockers, double roller chain, carb work, etc. It has the stock bore and stroke. I have a close friend that has a 2006 dodge 3500 with the Banks stuff on it. Surprisingly it lags a little at takeoff from a stop. If we are in the mountains my old 77 will actually accelerate better. Where I lose out is on a long climb. I am alright as long as I don't get slowed down, but if I do I can't get the speed back up. His dodge will speed back up to where it was at. It just surprises me that the old 77 will do that good. Also when I think about what he paid for that truck and the Banks upgrade I figure even with my lower mpg I can buy gas for the next 20 years. Except for the wind noise, which I have tried everything thinkable to eliminate, my 77 is just as comfortable and a lot more fun to drive.
#17
OK, so as it would seem to read, factory ratings is a relative number that seems to be all over the place.
I noticed that someone commented that the torque is mostly what you feel with the 460 because it is a low reving motor. For the occasional tromp on the gas and driver shifting, what would be a good redline to set?
I noticed that someone commented that the torque is mostly what you feel with the 460 because it is a low reving motor. For the occasional tromp on the gas and driver shifting, what would be a good redline to set?
#18
Originally Posted by Voh
OK, so as it would seem to read, factory ratings is a relative number that seems to be all over the place.
I noticed that someone commented that the torque is mostly what you feel with the 460 because it is a low reving motor. For the occasional tromp on the gas and driver shifting, what would be a good redline to set?
I noticed that someone commented that the torque is mostly what you feel with the 460 because it is a low reving motor. For the occasional tromp on the gas and driver shifting, what would be a good redline to set?
#20
#22
#23
thats what stroker kits are for to give you more power at a lower rpm. yes it will suck gas a little worse, or a lot worse depending on how hard you are on the throttle and the cam size, but you can have a very fast truck thats still useful if you build it right, or if you just want more top end you could use forced induction and have both power and economy.
#24
Originally Posted by darrin1999
thats what stroker kits are for to give you more power at a lower rpm. yes it will suck gas a little worse, or a lot worse depending on how hard you are on the throttle and the cam size, but you can have a very fast truck thats still useful if you build it right, or if you just want more top end you could use forced induction and have both power and economy.
#25
hey, i said it was an option- i didnt say it made sense to
im building a 545 stroker 12-1 compression to run on propane- it will have lots of power (about 500 horse flywheel give or take, and around 600 ft-lbs torque) and still be able to be used for work, offroading, or whatever- but the 5 to 6 mpg will suck- but its a toy not daily transportation, thats what the probe is for. 22 mpg in town, about 35 highway.
im building a 545 stroker 12-1 compression to run on propane- it will have lots of power (about 500 horse flywheel give or take, and around 600 ft-lbs torque) and still be able to be used for work, offroading, or whatever- but the 5 to 6 mpg will suck- but its a toy not daily transportation, thats what the probe is for. 22 mpg in town, about 35 highway.
#26
#27
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mark hojsan
Big Block V8 - 385 Series (6.1/370, 7.0/429, 7.5/460)
0
10-04-2016 04:38 PM
Diesel_Brad
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
21
10-17-2015 07:40 PM
Crewcabber
Big Block V8 - 385 Series (6.1/370, 7.0/429, 7.5/460)
2
05-30-2015 05:53 PM
75 Camper Special
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
2
05-17-2014 02:41 PM