Factory Ratings - 460

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #16  
Old 07-17-2007, 10:15 AM
fasthauler's Avatar
fasthauler
fasthauler is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Hesperia, CA
Posts: 1,382
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
The 460 is a phenomenal performer for what it is in stock condition. Mine has had some minor improvements, exhaust, heads reworked, MSD ignition, roller rockers, double roller chain, carb work, etc. It has the stock bore and stroke. I have a close friend that has a 2006 dodge 3500 with the Banks stuff on it. Surprisingly it lags a little at takeoff from a stop. If we are in the mountains my old 77 will actually accelerate better. Where I lose out is on a long climb. I am alright as long as I don't get slowed down, but if I do I can't get the speed back up. His dodge will speed back up to where it was at. It just surprises me that the old 77 will do that good. Also when I think about what he paid for that truck and the Banks upgrade I figure even with my lower mpg I can buy gas for the next 20 years. Except for the wind noise, which I have tried everything thinkable to eliminate, my 77 is just as comfortable and a lot more fun to drive.
 
  #17  
Old 07-17-2007, 02:06 PM
Voh's Avatar
Voh
Voh is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
OK, so as it would seem to read, factory ratings is a relative number that seems to be all over the place.

I noticed that someone commented that the torque is mostly what you feel with the 460 because it is a low reving motor. For the occasional tromp on the gas and driver shifting, what would be a good redline to set?
 
  #18  
Old 07-17-2007, 03:22 PM
Bear 45/70's Avatar
Bear 45/70
Bear 45/70 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Union, Washington
Posts: 6,056
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by Voh
OK, so as it would seem to read, factory ratings is a relative number that seems to be all over the place.

I noticed that someone commented that the torque is mostly what you feel with the 460 because it is a low reving motor. For the occasional tromp on the gas and driver shifting, what would be a good redline to set?
Anything over 4500 with a stock motor is just abuse for no gain.
 
  #19  
Old 07-17-2007, 03:39 PM
Voh's Avatar
Voh
Voh is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thank you. I had initially set my ticker to 4000 - good guess.
 
  #20  
Old 07-17-2007, 03:55 PM
Bear 45/70's Avatar
Bear 45/70
Bear 45/70 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Union, Washington
Posts: 6,056
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by Voh
Thank you. I had initially set my ticker to 4000 - good guess.
I don't run mine over 4000 either. This isn't a race truck or motor.
 
  #21  
Old 07-17-2007, 10:19 PM
darrin1999's Avatar
darrin1999
darrin1999 is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: fargo, nd
Posts: 1,526
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Bear 45/70
This isn't a race truck or motor.
but it sure can be if you build it that way
 
  #22  
Old 07-17-2007, 10:48 PM
Bear 45/70's Avatar
Bear 45/70
Bear 45/70 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Union, Washington
Posts: 6,056
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by darrin1999
but it sure can be if you build it that way
Not if you want a usable truck for driving the trash to the dump or towning the boat to the lake or the quads to the hills. I've had race vehicles and unless you are a hardcore racer, they are next to useless.
 
  #23  
Old 07-17-2007, 11:11 PM
darrin1999's Avatar
darrin1999
darrin1999 is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: fargo, nd
Posts: 1,526
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
thats what stroker kits are for to give you more power at a lower rpm. yes it will suck gas a little worse, or a lot worse depending on how hard you are on the throttle and the cam size, but you can have a very fast truck thats still useful if you build it right, or if you just want more top end you could use forced induction and have both power and economy.
 
  #24  
Old 07-17-2007, 11:28 PM
Bear 45/70's Avatar
Bear 45/70
Bear 45/70 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Union, Washington
Posts: 6,056
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by darrin1999
thats what stroker kits are for to give you more power at a lower rpm. yes it will suck gas a little worse, or a lot worse depending on how hard you are on the throttle and the cam size, but you can have a very fast truck thats still useful if you build it right, or if you just want more top end you could use forced induction and have both power and economy.
At $3 a gallon for regular and if you hot rod it right, you are into at least another $.30 a gallon for premium. Just not feasible for the average guy. Hell, I've been using the 1999 Ranger with the 4.0 liter motor with it's 17 to 20 mpg when the camper or big trailer don't go because of fuel costs.
 
  #25  
Old 07-18-2007, 07:46 AM
darrin1999's Avatar
darrin1999
darrin1999 is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: fargo, nd
Posts: 1,526
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
hey, i said it was an option- i didnt say it made sense to
im building a 545 stroker 12-1 compression to run on propane- it will have lots of power (about 500 horse flywheel give or take, and around 600 ft-lbs torque) and still be able to be used for work, offroading, or whatever- but the 5 to 6 mpg will suck- but its a toy not daily transportation, thats what the probe is for. 22 mpg in town, about 35 highway.
 
  #26  
Old 07-19-2007, 03:42 PM
mando jake's Avatar
mando jake
mando jake is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Leitchfield, ky
Posts: 484
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hey guys, I dont want to highjack this thread or anything, but I have a DOVE 460 W/D0VE heads and Im wondering what its factory ratings were. Its out of a lincoln. Ive had some guesses thrown at me, but nothing very credible. Jake
 
  #27  
Old 07-19-2007, 04:26 PM
darrin1999's Avatar
darrin1999
darrin1999 is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: fargo, nd
Posts: 1,526
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
chiltons says 365 hp and 500 ft-lbs
but thats back before they changed the way they rated horsepower... with the modern hp rating its around 290-300, rear wheel through a c-6 and ford 9 that came factory in the lincoln more like 240-250
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mark hojsan
Big Block V8 - 385 Series (6.1/370, 7.0/429, 7.5/460)
0
10-04-2016 04:38 PM
Hardlanding
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
6
03-07-2016 09:34 AM
Diesel_Brad
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
21
10-17-2015 07:40 PM
Crewcabber
Big Block V8 - 385 Series (6.1/370, 7.0/429, 7.5/460)
2
05-30-2015 05:53 PM
75 Camper Special
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
2
05-17-2014 02:41 PM



Quick Reply: Factory Ratings - 460



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:29 AM.