Ford Truck Enthusiasts, The Internet's Leading Ford Trucks Resource, F150
 
  

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Other Fords > Ranchero and 1961 - 1967 Econoline
Register - Join us, its Free! FAQ Members List Timeslips Calendar Mark Forums Read





Is F-150 Still King?


 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 07-09-2007, 08:45 AM
New User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SoCal
Posts: 20
waztmp is starting off with a positive reputation.
Pilot Bearing help - 61 Econoline

I have acquired a 200 CI 6 to be dropped into my 61 Econoline P/U. Being a newbie at this and wanting to keep costs low, I am trying to do this myself. Anyway, finding difficulties trying to put the clutch/bellhousing back together with the engine... and believe the problem is that I am missing some parts - like the pilot bearing, and what it rides in? (I understand that it should reside at the end of the crankshaft). I am guessing that the engine came out of a vehicle that had an automatic transmission. Any help is appreciated - thanks...
   
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
To remove this ad, register today!

  #2 (permalink)  
Old 07-10-2007, 11:28 PM
New User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SoCal
Posts: 20
waztmp is starting off with a positive reputation.
Well, I am resigned to locating a pilot bearing / assembly - so that I can install the 200 Ci 6 cylinder with the original 3-speed manual transmission - back into the 61 Econoline P/U. Does anyone know where one can be found?
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 07-15-2007, 11:33 PM
New User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SoCal
Posts: 20
waztmp is starting off with a positive reputation.
Found under RockAuto an 8016 bearing - and purchased at Napa Auto. It slipped in real easy into the crankshaft... is this right? (OD is 1.378 inches... ID is .6299, which is just a hair smailler than the .634 max. stated for the transmission input shaft). Also, I placed the rubber backing towards the transmission, not towards the crankshaft - does anyone know if this is correct? Lastly, is there any special tricks involved in re-connecting the transmission back to the engine? I have used a universal tool in reinstalling the clutch and pressure plate....
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 07-16-2007, 04:11 AM
NumberDummy's Avatar
Ford Parts Guru
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 19,021
NumberDummy has a spectacular reputation.NumberDummy has a spectacular reputation.NumberDummy has a spectacular reputation.NumberDummy has a spectacular reputation.NumberDummy has a spectacular reputation.NumberDummy has a spectacular reputation.NumberDummy has a spectacular reputation.NumberDummy has a spectacular reputation.NumberDummy has a spectacular reputation.NumberDummy has a spectacular reputation.NumberDummy has a spectacular reputation.
1961 Econolines used 144 or 170 engines. The transmission is the 2.77 crash first type. 200 engines used the Ford 3.03 all syncro transmission, only. A 200 using the earlier 2.77 transmission, is the reason I typed no part number for the pilot bearing, because I didn't know what would fit.

The 144/170 pilot bearing is: 1.38" O.D. - .629 I.D. - 1/2" thick.

The 200 pilot bearing is: 1.38" O.D. - 11/16" I.D. (Ford p/n: C20Z-7600-A)

Both of these are solid bronze bearings.
__________________
Bill / Retired Ford Parts Manager ~ 1962/1997

Part Number Research: Trucks: 1928/2002 / Cars: 1928/2003

1963 Galaxie 500XL / 1965 F100 / 2008 Fusion S / 2008 Edge SEL

Last edited by NumberDummy : 07-16-2007 at 04:14 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 07-16-2007, 08:32 AM
New User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SoCal
Posts: 20
waztmp is starting off with a positive reputation.
It seems that the 144/170 bronze bearing would be the right one - is there a part # somewhere?
Thanks - Waz
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 07-16-2007, 09:43 AM
NumberDummy's Avatar
Ford Parts Guru
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 19,021
NumberDummy has a spectacular reputation.NumberDummy has a spectacular reputation.NumberDummy has a spectacular reputation.NumberDummy has a spectacular reputation.NumberDummy has a spectacular reputation.NumberDummy has a spectacular reputation.NumberDummy has a spectacular reputation.NumberDummy has a spectacular reputation.NumberDummy has a spectacular reputation.NumberDummy has a spectacular reputation.NumberDummy has a spectacular reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by waztmp
It seems that the 144/170 bronze bearing would be the right one - is there a part # somewhere?
Thanks - Waz
Sure. I didn't list it because I thought you already had one, seeing how you are swapping engines, and the 144/170 pilot bushing would have been the one originally used.

C0DZ-7600-A .. Pilot Bushing = replaces: C0DD-7600-A
__________________
Bill / Retired Ford Parts Manager ~ 1962/1997

Part Number Research: Trucks: 1928/2002 / Cars: 1928/2003

1963 Galaxie 500XL / 1965 F100 / 2008 Fusion S / 2008 Edge SEL
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 07-17-2007, 08:03 AM
New User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Asheville, NC
Posts: 23
charlie12345 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Just curious, my '63 came to me with a '65 200ci, but the tranny is the 2.77 crash type. Was that a direct swap-out or did they have to change the flywheel/clutch and/or driveshaft?

Charlie
'63 Chero
Still in the Shop
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 07-17-2007, 08:44 AM
New User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SoCal
Posts: 20
waztmp is starting off with a positive reputation.
Have not gotten it all done yet - but it appears that the scatter shield (from the transmission) aligns up with the holes on the 200 CI. It seems like a direct swap - I could give more info, but I am learning about this as I go along... I just know that the 8016 pilot bearing fits into place w/o having to pound it in. Will supply more info as this project goes along.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 11-12-2007, 04:56 PM
Elder User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 562
Beanscoot is starting off with a positive reputation.
I'm trying to remember the details when I helped a friend replace the 144 in his Falcon with a 200. I think the 200 had a different bellhousing pattern, so we had to hunt down a bellhousing to adapt to the "toploader" pattern.
As an aside, the non-synchro transmissions were used in Canada until 1964.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 11-12-2007, 05:03 PM
New User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SoCal
Posts: 20
waztmp is starting off with a positive reputation.
It has been awhile since I last replied to this - but the 200 was a direct bolt-in... got the engine in - and running....
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:03 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 1997-2008 Internet Brands, Inc.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - Jobs

Ford-Trucks.com and Internet Brands, Inc. are not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company.