Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Diesel > Bio-diesel, Propane & Alternative Diesel Engine Fuels
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?


Welcome to Ford-Trucks Forums!
Welcome to Ford-Trucks.com.

You are currently viewing our forums as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Ford-Trucks Forums community today!





 
Reply
 
 
 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 06-25-2007, 09:51 AM
Wheatina's Avatar
Wheatina Wheatina is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Eastern Washington State
Posts: 200
Wheatina is starting off with a positive reputation.
BD & engine running temps...improved MPG??

I was reading a thread about engine running temp and improved mileage and got to wondering about this issue while using biodiesel. It is my thought that BD runs cooler than #2 due to the lower BTU content by comparison. I may be wrong here, but that's my perception. So, would using one of this 203* thermostats improve MPG using BD?? I don't know...has anyone tried this or looked into this issue?? Plus, I use my truck for pulling a big 37' 5th wheel, so it's primary use is for heavy loads. So, would this thermostat be even better in that situation to run the lower BTU biodiesel when pulling loads??

I also got to thinking if this cooler running temp might be one reason BD tends to give slightly lower MPG...what do you think??

Here's the thread link...actually, there are two links discussing this, so I've included both.

http://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/626010-20-mpg.html

http://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/62...the-story.html
__________________
'99.5 PSD 7.3L 4X4 manual 6-speed F350 Lariat Dually Ext. cab long bed(Big Red)
http://www.3dflags.com/media/icon/cl...s_wa_2fawm.gifhttp://www.eapglass.com/FlowerPowerSm.jpg
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-25-2007, 10:33 AM
cookie88's Avatar
cookie88 cookie88 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Cabot, Arkansas
Posts: 13,244
cookie88 has a brilliant futurecookie88 has a brilliant futurecookie88 has a brilliant futurecookie88 has a brilliant futurecookie88 has a brilliant futurecookie88 has a brilliant futurecookie88 has a brilliant futurecookie88 has a brilliant futurecookie88 has a brilliant futurecookie88 has a brilliant futurecookie88 has a brilliant future
f250juggernaut
In my experience fuel economy is largely a matter of perception. I've tried just about everything, including a 203 t-stat, and while I'm thinking about improved economy my driving style adjusts and I get improved economy.

Funny thing is, when the new wears off and I get back to my "regular" driving style, my fuel economy returns to it's previous state. The nice thing about that is my truck got ~17 mpg stone stock, and now 176,000 miles and an additional 200 horsepower later......it still gets ~17 mpg.

The bottom line is....if you want better fuel economy you have to drive slower, feather the throttle, baby the rig....etc. etc.
__________________
Scott
His: 01 F-250 Lariat, 7.3, ZF-6, NV271
Hers: 06 Freestar SEL 4.2l
79 Bronco Ranger XLT.. used be the driver, now waiting to become the project.
96 Grand Marquis LS... 25 mpg commuter
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-30-2007, 08:33 PM
echo95's Avatar
echo95 echo95 is offline
Junior User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Santa Rosa Beach, FL
Posts: 60
echo95 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Wouldn't lower BTUs give you less MPG due to less energy produced from the same amount of fuel? I may be over simplifying this. Correct me if I'm wrong. Thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-30-2007, 08:48 PM
bigredtruckmi's Avatar
bigredtruckmi bigredtruckmi is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Grand Ledge, Michigan
Posts: 4,632
bigredtruckmi has a good reputation on FTE.bigredtruckmi has a good reputation on FTE.bigredtruckmi has a good reputation on FTE.
According to the chevron site. Expect a 1 to 2% lower MPG with the reduced BTU's in the ULSD.

I agree that driving habits have a lot to do with MPG. For example if we keep our foot out of the IP and drive a grandpa 55 instead of 75-80 you'll see a marked difference in MPG. I tried this for 200 miles and there was about a 4 mpg difference. We got 20 MPG on our 04 instead of our usual 16.
__________________
red 04 F250 build date 04/04 6.0 PSD
2013 gulfstream canyon trail fifth wheel Aztec edition 40 ft
Vietnam Vet/ OS1 USN/USNR retired 26 years
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-01-2007, 02:57 PM
CheaperJeeper's Avatar
CheaperJeeper CheaperJeeper is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Kent WA
Posts: 2,175
CheaperJeeper is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Well, regardless of what the Chevron folks or anyone else says, my truck gets better mileage on B20 than it does on #2.

Although the BTUs are 10% lower, the higher cetane and better lubricity seems to more than make up for it......
__________________
84 Jeep Cherokee Chief 2-door 4WD - 4.3 Olds V6 diesel, 4.56 gears. Turbo coming soon.

84 Mercedes 300CD Turbo. Bone stock daily driver

86 F250 Super Cab 4x6 (dually), 7.3 Banks TURBO, SMF & ZF5-47, 4.10 gears, 3" Banks straight-pipe exhaust. Mileage unknown
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-01-2007, 10:43 PM
fabmandelux's Avatar
fabmandelux fabmandelux is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Paradise Found!
Posts: 22,566
fabmandelux has a superb reputationfabmandelux has a superb reputationfabmandelux has a superb reputationfabmandelux has a superb reputationfabmandelux has a superb reputationfabmandelux has a superb reputationfabmandelux has a superb reputationfabmandelux has a superb reputationfabmandelux has a superb reputationfabmandelux has a superb reputationfabmandelux has a superb reputation
Quote:
Originally Posted by CheaperJeeper
Well, regardless of what the Chevron folks or anyone else says, my truck gets better mileage on B20 than it does on #2.

Although the BTUs are 10% lower, the higher cetane and better lubricity seems to more than make up for it......
Biodiesel is an oxyigenated fuel, it contains aprox 10% oxygen. I think this is why I get better milage from my B-100.
__________________
Oregon Chapter Leader My friends call me Don.
"I always keep a supply of stimulants handy in case I see a snake, which I also keep handy" WC Fields

RIP Steve Price. A true friend and a tireless supporter of FTE
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-02-2007, 08:55 AM
Phydeaux88's Avatar
Phydeaux88 Phydeaux88 is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: South Texas Coast
Posts: 1,569
Phydeaux88 is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.Phydeaux88 is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
It is possible that the endogenous oxygen promotes more complete fuel burn that would explain the improved MPGs despite lower BTUs

Diesel engines typically waste 30% of the fuel injected by burning more fuel you increase engine efficiency.That is also the principal behind propane injection.
__________________
2006 F350 4X4 Crew Cab King Ranch edition strictly factory, for now.
Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2007, 08:55 AM
 
 
 
Reply

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Diesel > Bio-diesel, Propane & Alternative Diesel Engine Fuels

Tags
cooler, engine, improves, mpg, running

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 AC1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Statement - Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. FordŽ is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.

vbulletin Admin Backup