Ford Truck Enthusiasts, The Internet's Leading Ford Trucks Resource, F150
 

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Diesel > 2010 4.4L Ford Diesel

2010 4.4L Ford Diesel Discuss the upcoming 4.4L Ford diesel engine




Is F-150 Still King?
 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 06-13-2007, 02:47 PM
origcharger origcharger is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,717
origcharger is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
New Lawsuit Involving F-150 Diesel

"Navistar Files Lawsuit Against Ford for Breach of Contract Involving Diesel Engines for Ford F-150 Pickup Trucks





Warrenville, IL (June 6, 2007) Navistar International Corporation (Other OTC: NAVZ) announced today that it has filed a lawsuit against Ford Motor Company for breach of contract relating to a diesel engine contract involving the Ford F-150 pickup truck and is seeking damages. The suit, filed in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Ill., seeks “at least hundreds of millions of dollars.”

Navistar believes that Ford intends to introduce a new diesel engine that actually was designed by International Truck and Engine Corporation, Navistar’s principal operating company.

According to the lawsuit, Ford is developing a 4.4 liter diesel engine for production in North America by late 2009 or 2010 or possibly earlier and intends to produce the engine itself for use in the F-150, and possibly other vehicles. The lawsuit states that Ford cannot do that without violating its contract with Navistar. Reportedly, Ford is considering producing V8 diesel engines at a Ford facility in Chihuahua, Mexico.

The lawsuit states that International spent millions of dollars and devoted years of its employees’ time to develop a next generation diesel engine named “Lion” for use in vehicles including the F-150 pickup trucks in which Ford had not previously offered diesel engines. Ford agreed that International, which has been the exclusive diesel engine supplier for Ford’s heavy-duty pickup trucks since 1979, would manufacture the new diesel engines for Ford in North America.

The lawsuit, filed June 4, is separate from previously reported litigation between the two companies. Earlier this year, Ford filed a lawsuit against Navistar involving 2007 engine pricing and prior period warranty claims on Power Stroke® diesel engines. Navistar counter-sued, stating that pricing is consistent with contractual agreements, that the warranty claims are entirely without merit and that Ford has stopped honoring the terms of an agreement under which engines were built. Navistar amended its counter-complaint on May 2 and asked for in excess of $2 billion in damages.

International’s operating company recently launched a new 6.4L Power Stroke® diesel engine for Ford that meets 2007 emissions standards while increasing performance, durability and fuel economy."
__________________
2004 E-450 6.0 129,200 miles
7,500 mile, 15 quart oil changes, 5W-40 Rotella.
UOAs consist of checking for metal on drain plug magnet. All stock, no mods. Dyed fuel with no additives. Never been reflashed.
Total parts replaced;
one EGR valve.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 06-13-2007, 03:43 PM
Beachbumcook's Avatar
Beachbumcook Beachbumcook is offline
Got Diesel?
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,715
Beachbumcook has a very good reputation on FTE. Beachbumcook has a very good reputation on FTE. Beachbumcook has a very good reputation on FTE. Beachbumcook has a very good reputation on FTE.
Ford has "mucked" this relationship up so much.... and they will wonder what happened when Toyota launches a diesel or worse yet... gets together with CAT or who knows... Navistar???

The whole strained relationship between Ford and Navistar is enough to make one stay away from their diesels as warrenty, parts, support, training and the like will be severely hampered.

From what I can tell and reading between the lines... Ford is in the wrong and Navistar in the right???

Ford should sell out like Chrysler and move on with a new partner.
__________________
03 Excursion 6.0L PSD
Magnafine P/S Fluid Filter
Racor By-Pass Oil Filter System
Dieselsite Coolant Filter
Bilstein Shocks/Rancho Steering Stabilizer
Fumoto Oil Drain Valve
BriteBox Headlight Module
Marinco AC Block Heater Plug
24" Wiper Blades
Window Screen - Radiator Bug Shield
Pioneer Airware XM Radio
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 06-13-2007, 04:00 PM
origcharger origcharger is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,717
origcharger is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
"From what I can tell and reading between the lines... Ford is in the wrong and Navistar in the right???"

Well it was a press release from International so it presants their side of the story and not Ford's.


What I found interesting was that International claims the 4.4 was their design? The common conception I have read on here is that its design is from one of Ford's European entities.
__________________
2004 E-450 6.0 129,200 miles
7,500 mile, 15 quart oil changes, 5W-40 Rotella.
UOAs consist of checking for metal on drain plug magnet. All stock, no mods. Dyed fuel with no additives. Never been reflashed.
Total parts replaced;
one EGR valve.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 06-13-2007, 04:51 PM
tjc transport's Avatar
tjc transport tjc transport is online now
is it friday yet??
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Laurence Harbor N.J.
Posts: 13,642
tjc transport has a spectacular reputation. tjc transport has a spectacular reputation. tjc transport has a spectacular reputation. tjc transport has a spectacular reputation. tjc transport has a spectacular reputation. tjc transport has a spectacular reputation. tjc transport has a spectacular reputation. tjc transport has a spectacular reputation. tjc transport has a spectacular reputation. tjc transport has a spectacular reputation. tjc transport has a spectacular reputation.
navistar in my opinion is pulling at straws. they know that if ford stops buying diesel engines from them, they are gonna be in real deep dog doo.
for is in a signed contract. they did not stop buying engines from navistar, and never claimed they were going to back out of their contract. it is all a bunch of B.S. navistar is pulling to make themselves look good, and ford look bad, and dates back to navistar's failing to make good on their obligations for warranty work regarding the 6.0 engine.

if they would just buck up and work with ford, there would be no problems.
__________________
Tom
JOIN THE NEW JERSEY CHAPTER CLICK HERE

NEW JERSEY CHAPTER LEADER and number one trouble maker.
owner of way too many fords.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 06-13-2007, 10:47 PM
origcharger origcharger is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,717
origcharger is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by tjc transport

if they would just buck up and work with ford, there would be no problems.

Or if Ford would just "buck up" and work with Navistar, there would be no problems.
__________________
2004 E-450 6.0 129,200 miles
7,500 mile, 15 quart oil changes, 5W-40 Rotella.
UOAs consist of checking for metal on drain plug magnet. All stock, no mods. Dyed fuel with no additives. Never been reflashed.
Total parts replaced;
one EGR valve.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 06-13-2007, 11:42 PM
chaparro chaparro is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: town near el paso tx.
Posts: 155
chaparro is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by origcharger
Or if Ford would just "buck up" and work with Navistar, there would be no problems.
O M G this guy has no brain. If you buy " X " product and it fails in the warranty period, What are you going to do? Claim to be fixed, or pay out of your pocket to fix the X product. Obious!.... Ok if the manufacturer denies to fixed probably your first decision stop paying what you owe to force the manufacturer to fix your product. Now the Ford & Navistar problem is a more complex situation. For what every body knows navistar is not honoring their part of the warranty on their crappy engines. Ford's reputation in diesel line pickups is pending because the lack quality on these problematic engines.
__________________
1973 F-100 360gas110000m
1985 Mercury Marquis 3.8gas 186000m.(Junked)
1994 FordAspire1.3gasStillalive 234000
1999 F 250 Work Truck159000
2002 Excursion 69000
2005 FordFocus24000
1997 PlymothMinivan167000 M
2008 F250 FX4x4 Diesel Supercab
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 06-14-2007, 06:53 AM
origcharger origcharger is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,717
origcharger is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by chaparro
Now the Ford & Navistar problem is a more complex situation. For what every body knows navistar is not honoring their part of the warranty on their crappy engines.

"Now the Ford & Navistar problem is a more complex situation."

Definately!


"For what every body knows navistar is not honoring their part of the warranty on their crappy engines."


Opinion and conjecture.
__________________
2004 E-450 6.0 129,200 miles
7,500 mile, 15 quart oil changes, 5W-40 Rotella.
UOAs consist of checking for metal on drain plug magnet. All stock, no mods. Dyed fuel with no additives. Never been reflashed.
Total parts replaced;
one EGR valve.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 06-14-2007, 07:33 AM
tex25025's Avatar
tex25025 tex25025 is online now
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,945
tex25025 has a very good reputation on FTE. tex25025 has a very good reputation on FTE. tex25025 has a very good reputation on FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by origcharger
"For what every body knows navistar is not honoring their part of the warranty on their crappy engines."


Opinion and conjecture.
Actually that is hearsay and over generalization. Also he said "For what everybody knows" that logically means all people, including people at navistar and at ford(which I would hope some people in both those companies knows more then I do). Which also goes into the over generalization.
__________________
'06 6.0L Turbo Diesel King Ranch DRW 4.30 Gears
Spartan Stage 1 Towing Injectors
Spartan 64mm Non-VGT Turbo
Fluidampner
Headstuds
Beta Spartan Phalanx
Fuel Regulated Return
FASS 150/180
Suncoast Heavy Duty Torqshift Rebuild
5" Straight-Piped MBRP Exhaust
Tranny, EGT, Boost, and Fuel PSI C2 Gauges
Water Temp, Oil PSI, Volts Antique Beige Gauges

Last edited by tex25025; 06-14-2007 at 07:59 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 06-14-2007, 08:28 AM
Beachbumcook's Avatar
Beachbumcook Beachbumcook is offline
Got Diesel?
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,715
Beachbumcook has a very good reputation on FTE. Beachbumcook has a very good reputation on FTE. Beachbumcook has a very good reputation on FTE. Beachbumcook has a very good reputation on FTE.
Maybe Ford should have tested these motors with low cetane fuel (40 - 42) which is the most common fuel most of us buy. They should have bought from regular fuel stations like the rest of us do?

Maybe Ford should have towed and worked these trucks like many of us do?

Maybe Ford should have tested a few " aftermarket tuners" just to develop a "worse case senerio" base line and knowing that many deisels get
tested" this way?

Maybe Ford should have towed at max rating throught the mountains to check for head gasket failure and "puking" and done more than a 1 week run.

Maybe Ford should have trained all their techs "proactively" instead of "on the job training". They have done better on the 6.4L... but not to do so for the 6.0L was a mistake.

Maybe Ford should have stayed with the "stock" Nasvistar tune and not tried to boost the HP and torque as much as they did? Navistar does not even come close to having the problems that Ford does with their version (VT365) of this motor?

Maybe Ford should have used the Navistar electronics and injectors like Navistar uses and not try and "redevelop" the motor with their engineers?
__________________
03 Excursion 6.0L PSD
Magnafine P/S Fluid Filter
Racor By-Pass Oil Filter System
Dieselsite Coolant Filter
Bilstein Shocks/Rancho Steering Stabilizer
Fumoto Oil Drain Valve
BriteBox Headlight Module
Marinco AC Block Heater Plug
24" Wiper Blades
Window Screen - Radiator Bug Shield
Pioneer Airware XM Radio
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 06-14-2007, 08:41 AM
KrenzyRyan's Avatar
KrenzyRyan KrenzyRyan is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 622
KrenzyRyan is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by origcharger
Reportedly, Ford is considering producing V8 diesel engines at a Ford facility in Chihuahua, Mexico.
Meh, I'm all for having the diesel engines in the F150's - but I don't think I want to be buying my hardware from there...no offense

Honeywell Is moving alot of their hardware (outsourcing) to Chihuahua - and so far none of it is coming back good...
__________________
-Ryan

Quote:
Originally Posted by HKusp View Post
You will get another. Once you are finished with school, you will realize that you aren't a practical car type of guy, you are a truck guy, and more importantly, you are a POWERSTROKE kind of guy. I wish you well in your endeavors in school. See you around the boards.

Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 06-14-2007, 09:48 AM
Paul K Paul K is offline
Junior User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 55
Paul K is starting off with a positive reputation.
It's no wonder! The new trucks so expensive and that sales are down because of it! Between the health plan costs and running up the tab with ridiculously expensive corporate $450.00 per hour legal fees, the smaller diesel will end up costing as much as the bigger one does.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 06-15-2007, 07:25 AM
SirHailstone's Avatar
SirHailstone SirHailstone is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 658
SirHailstone is starting off with a positive reputation.
Nissan will be the invisible hand here. Ford knows if they ditch International, Nissan will start buying the engines and Ford will be without a supplier unless they can somehow start building the engines themselves (not likely), or perhaps go somewhere else - maybe Caterpillar?
__________________
2007 F-250 SuperDuty 6.0 Power Stroke Diesel 4x4 S.Cab
2006 Kawasaki Ninja 500R - My 50MPG toy!
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 06-15-2007, 08:04 AM
tex25025's Avatar
tex25025 tex25025 is online now
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,945
tex25025 has a very good reputation on FTE. tex25025 has a very good reputation on FTE. tex25025 has a very good reputation on FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SirHailstone
or perhaps go somewhere else - maybe Caterpillar?
There are a number of people that want to throw that out there, I would be willing to bet that the odds of that happening are very very slim(not to say that it wouldn't happen, but it would take a miracle for caterpillar to enter that type of market).
__________________
'06 6.0L Turbo Diesel King Ranch DRW 4.30 Gears
Spartan Stage 1 Towing Injectors
Spartan 64mm Non-VGT Turbo
Fluidampner
Headstuds
Beta Spartan Phalanx
Fuel Regulated Return
FASS 150/180
Suncoast Heavy Duty Torqshift Rebuild
5" Straight-Piped MBRP Exhaust
Tranny, EGT, Boost, and Fuel PSI C2 Gauges
Water Temp, Oil PSI, Volts Antique Beige Gauges
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 06-15-2007, 08:13 AM
Paul K Paul K is offline
Junior User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 55
Paul K is starting off with a positive reputation.
Cat as a company has some very, very deep pockets, they have the fianancial resources to do whatever they want to do. I just don't think that the way Cat is structured that they could be competive price wise with International or Cummins, but I could be wrong? I think that Ford and International will settle their differences out of necessity.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 06-15-2007, 09:26 AM
Beachbumcook's Avatar
Beachbumcook Beachbumcook is offline
Got Diesel?
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,715
Beachbumcook has a very good reputation on FTE. Beachbumcook has a very good reputation on FTE. Beachbumcook has a very good reputation on FTE. Beachbumcook has a very good reputation on FTE.
My long-shot bet is that Toyota and CAT team up together.

Remember... you heard it here first (and I got it from Diesel Power Magazine).
__________________
03 Excursion 6.0L PSD
Magnafine P/S Fluid Filter
Racor By-Pass Oil Filter System
Dieselsite Coolant Filter
Bilstein Shocks/Rancho Steering Stabilizer
Fumoto Oil Drain Valve
BriteBox Headlight Module
Marinco AC Block Heater Plug
24" Wiper Blades
Window Screen - Radiator Bug Shield
Pioneer Airware XM Radio
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:54 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 1997-2008 Internet Brands, Inc.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.