Ford Truck Enthusiasts, The Internet's Leading Ford Trucks Resource, F150
 
 

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Performance, Engines and Troubleshooting > Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
Register - Join us, its Free! FAQ Members List Timeslips Calendar Mark Forums Read





Is F-150 Still King?


 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 06-08-2007, 08:36 PM
Elder User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Earth
Posts: 590
BaronVonAutomatc is starting off with a positive reputation.
For what purpose are you using this van?
__________________
1986 Bronco w/300 I6 & ZF 5-Speed
1982 F250 4x4 w/302 & C6
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
To remove this ad, register today!

  #17 (permalink)  
Old 06-08-2007, 11:05 PM
Senior User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 408
robertbourque is starting off with a positive reputation.
i will be using it for fishing long trips and some power when i need it i mean im not trying to build a drag van here i just want somthing with some power .i bought the pefromer rpm air gap intake tonight. next week im going to get a 3000 stall converter. then me and my dad are going to fab up a supercharger for it . hemi eater has confidence in me a my little 302 and so do i hemi has helped me alot at makeing up my mind cam choce opon other things so he thinks intake i got the intake im happy with my 302 .thanks all u guys
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 06-09-2007, 03:31 AM
Huntfamily53's Avatar
Senior User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: AZ
Posts: 188
Huntfamily53 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
It pains me to watch you struggle here.

Amen brotha...
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 06-09-2007, 03:42 AM
Freshman User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 31
Jeff92f150 is starting off with a positive reputation.
cam

robert, please don't put a performer rpm cam in your 302.... I had one in a 351W and it was noticably lumpy at idle. it won't have much low end in a 302.

now, when you say you want low end torque, is that for chugging down roads to get to a fishing hole? or is it to run at a track when you smack the gas down you want the van to get up and boogie. I am sorry but having it both ways is nearly impossible... on your budget.
I can say a 3000 stall converter will not be fun on the freeway and suck fuel like crazy, especially with your 4:10 gears.

I think at this point you have a 270H cam in it? 220-224 duration at ..050 lift on the intake? 500 lift? that is about as much as you can stick in there and have it driveable.

please take everyone's recommendation and realize that at this point the heads are the bottleneck and no amount of cam changes will have much affect on that...there are rebuilt & ported E7 heads out there with bigger valves for less than 500 bucks. this will really change things. any other iron gt40/gt40p/aftermarket iron head will make a huge difference.

robert, what pistons did you use during the rebuild? cast or forged? any pictures? what was the exact part number? this will help us direct you to a cylinder head that you can squeeze in to your budget.

oh, and if you want to continue to try and get low end torque out of a 302, you need to fuel inject it with a 90's vintage mustang style long runner intake... either a ported stock one, a cobra, gt40.
that will give you some semblance of low end torque & throttle response in the 302.
don't change the cam, it won't do much.
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 06-09-2007, 08:14 AM
Elder User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Earth
Posts: 590
BaronVonAutomatc is starting off with a positive reputation.
What Jeff said. Get an RV/truck converter instead of a 3000 stall. That's madness.

A 302 is what it is. Not really made for big heavy trucks/vans. It will perform well within it's limitations, but if you're looking for low-end there's no substitute for cubic inches (and stroke).

Or you could supercharge your van...
__________________
1986 Bronco w/300 I6 & ZF 5-Speed
1982 F250 4x4 w/302 & C6
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 06-10-2007, 11:36 PM
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: America
Posts: 1,134
JBradley500 is starting off with a positive reputation.
id call a cam company and tell them what your application is...

http://www.camresearchcorp.com/

id try and call them...maybe they could do something for your vehicles size and power needs.
__________________
New Plan...

410ci, 10:1, AFD 57cc 2v Heads, Edelbrock Intake and Phenolic Spacer, 725 cfm Road Demon, Roller 219/222 @.050 .535 lift 108 lsa, Bee-Hives, Dual Roller Chain, ARP's, MSD Pro Billet, Hedman Headers, Milodon Pan and HV Water Pump.
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 06-11-2007, 06:45 AM
HemiEater's Avatar
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,477
HemiEater is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JBradley500
id call a cam company and tell them what your application is...

http://www.camresearchcorp.com/

id try and call them...maybe they could do something for your vehicles size and power needs.

he would not like what they recommend.....cause it wouldn't have a race car idle.... He just don't get it....you can't have both.....
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 06-13-2007, 01:43 AM
Elder User
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Kent, WA
Posts: 507
RacinNdrummin is new and has a neutral reputation at this point.
If your 302 is in good shape (you said has 10,000 miles on it) pull it and sell it to a mustang guy, he should give you decent money for it. Go to the JY and pull a 351 (preferably an 87 or up), put a 268h cam in it if its not a roller block, put an HO cam or trick flow stg one cam in if it is, put a performer RPM intake, put a 600 or 650 vacuum secondary carb on it. This should have all the torque you need and have a nice idle at that, especially with the TFS 1 cam. Dont put in the 3000 stall, a 2000 should be fine even with a TFS1 cam. I mean I love the 302 as much as you do, and I think it is a better engineered engine than the 351w, but your asking a little too much unless you wanna put some decent heads on it, you have to rev a 302 to get power out of it, and its possible to get a BUNCH of power out of a 302, but you wont do it with stock castings and revving a 302 in a van with a 3000 stall is almost a waste of a good 302, I mean I know you got what you got, but lets look at things in a real way here, the 302 just aint gonna do it for you on a cheap basis.
__________________
74/71 maverick grabber EFI HO (under construction)

05 ranger 3.0/5spd supercab

90 Bronco II, 4.0 swap (UC) 5-speed, 4x4, factory D35
6" lift 33's 8.8...

91 Mustang LX 5.0 Coupe (new engine being built now)

91 E250 4.9 c6 3.73

95 F-150/SB/SC 351w swap, 3.55, 4r70w (Dads truck)

Last edited by RacinNdrummin : 06-13-2007 at 01:47 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 06-14-2007, 12:32 AM
Senior User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 408
robertbourque is starting off with a positive reputation.
i put in that edlebrock the 351 cam kit in it and i love it lost a little low end but once your moving its great lopes a bit still has some tq and tons of top end and im still using the 289 intake .i talked to the guy i bought the motor from he said my 302 has 351 pistons in it so with e7 heads the compression should be 11.1 thats why i thought it was stroked but the skirts on the pistons are shaved because the pin height on a 351 is diffrent . but any way soon to come heads and a peformer rpm intake .and a 3000 stall lockup convertor . thanks guys
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 06-14-2007, 01:05 AM
Elder User
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Kent, WA
Posts: 507
RacinNdrummin is new and has a neutral reputation at this point.
You dont have 351 pistons in your 302, I dont think there is a rod that would work with that combo and even if there was you would have a horrible rod ratio. 351 pistons with stock 302 rods will stick out of the block. The only way to get 11:1 with e7 heads is to have domed pistons and even at that you wouldnt be able to run pump gas.
__________________
74/71 maverick grabber EFI HO (under construction)

05 ranger 3.0/5spd supercab

90 Bronco II, 4.0 swap (UC) 5-speed, 4x4, factory D35
6" lift 33's 8.8...

91 Mustang LX 5.0 Coupe (new engine being built now)

91 E250 4.9 c6 3.73

95 F-150/SB/SC 351w swap, 3.55, 4r70w (Dads truck)
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 06-14-2007, 04:07 AM
HemiEater's Avatar
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,477
HemiEater is starting off with a positive reputation.
i talked to the guy i bought the motor from he said my 302 has 351 pistons in it so with e7 heads the compression should be 11.1 thats why i thought it was stroked but the skirts on the pistons are shaved because the pin height on a 351 is diffrent


No way.........lol.......
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 06-14-2007, 07:36 AM
HemiEater's Avatar
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,477
HemiEater is starting off with a positive reputation.
the 351W piston is .167 taller than a 302 so that would put the piston about .152 out of the hole........no amount of grinding on the skirt will change that, you would have to mill the tops of the pistons .152 to get it to 0 deck.


the wrist pins are the same either .927 or .912 for 302 or 351W
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 06-14-2007, 05:57 PM
Senior User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 408
robertbourque is starting off with a positive reputation.
well i dont know i have a 351 cam in a 302 with 14 lbs of vacume at idle and the kit claims 10 12 lbs for a 351 so somethngs diffrent ??
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 06-14-2007, 06:10 PM
HemiEater's Avatar
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,477
HemiEater is starting off with a positive reputation.
Sorry my mistake....

You have a .600 overbore 302 that has been stroked with a stock crank and 351W pistons....
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old 06-14-2007, 06:50 PM
Senior User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 408
robertbourque is starting off with a positive reputation.
no the 302 is bored 40 over im sorry i was going from what i mesured the pistons said .40 the skirts are shaved so they dont hit the counter weights on the crank i was assuming it was stroked but when i mesured it 3 inches down the hole to the top of the piston so i dont know why the skirts are shaved but they are .
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:58 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 1997-2008 Internet Brands, Inc.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - Jobs

Ford-Trucks.com and Internet Brands, Inc. are not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company.