Lightning, Harley-Davidson F-150, Roush F-150 & Saleen F-150 SVT Ford F150 Lightning, Roush, Saleen and other performance F150's

351w vs 5.4

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 05-02-2007, 05:47 PM
sbfbronco's Avatar
sbfbronco
sbfbronco is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question 351w vs 5.4

im looking into buying a lightning and i want to know which is better to mod for 600hp and make a every day driver i really dont know much about modular motors thats why im asking give me a price on both motors
 
  #2  
Old 05-02-2007, 07:05 PM
1979FordF-250's Avatar
1979FordF-250
1979FordF-250 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: NOR CAL
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
600hp is doable on a newer lightning with the 5.4. A smaller pulley on the stock supercharger for more boost, a good tune, intake, and finaly exhaust. They should roughly make 600hp or more depending on the components used. The modular motors are much more efficient than the 351, but don't get me wrong the 351 can make that same ammount of power, but it would probably need a whole new supercharger to make the ammount of boost that would be needed.

Research some of the aftermarkets for the lightnings. I know the Johnny Lightning has everything you would ever need. I think they have a newer lightning with the 5.4 running in the high 9's .

http://www.johnnylightningperf.com/index.php
 
  #3  
Old 05-03-2007, 03:40 AM
Stewart_H's Avatar
Stewart_H
Stewart_H is offline
Super Moderator
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Central Coast of CA
Posts: 29,376
Received 86 Likes on 79 Posts
Originally Posted by 1979FordF-250
600hp is doable on a newer lightning with the 5.4. A smaller pulley on the stock supercharger for more boost, a good tune, intake, and finaly exhaust.
600hp on the stock Eaton is VERY difficult to achieve. In all honesty, I don't think anyone has done it yet. JJ at Woodbine Motorsports was able to tune a built block, powered by a ported Eaton, and squeezed out 592hp, but that is the exception to the rule. Just to get into the 500hp range on a stock Eaton is exceptional, and most assuredly atypical. Most guys opt for the KB or Whipple to make their power into the 500/600 range.

A pulley change, good tune, and CAI will get most into the 400 hp range, at the wheels. Some will barely nudge into the 400 range with a pulley, chip, CAI setup.

I think they have a newer lightning with the 5.4 running in the high 9's
Johnny now has a twin turbo setup. He's turning in mid to high 8 second ET's with his current setup.

Sbfbronco, how did you come upon 600hp as your goal? Why did you choose that number?

What do you plan to do with your truck? Daily driver? Work truck? Haul/tow with it? Strictly race? What is your planned use?

How much do you plan on spending on your L to get the power you want? How realistic are your expectations versus the amount of money you have to spend?

In which state do you live? Do you have to worry about smog checks?

You need to first figure out what your goals are for your truck, and how you plan on using your truck, before you can set a realistic hp goal to reach.

Keep in mind, the rule of thumb is anything over 500hp means you should have a built block to handle the power. The stock rods are PMR forged and don't hold up well to having a lot more power put to them. A good built long block, to include ported heads and a matching camshafts, can run you between 8 to 10 grand. And that doesn't include the the cost to remove your old engine and install the new engine, or the additional cost for the support items you'll need to properly run the engine, like upgraded MAF, bigger injectors, upgraded fuel pumps, custom tuning, etc...

Then, after the built engine, you'll wanna wring out the most power, safely, so that means a new blower. The Whipples and KB's aint exactly cheap. I think the cheapest a Whipple can be had for is $3,400 + shipping.

Stewart

PS - All the above info is without nitrous being used.
 

Last edited by S_Harvey; 05-03-2007 at 04:02 AM.
  #4  
Old 05-03-2007, 07:46 PM
1979FordF-250's Avatar
1979FordF-250
1979FordF-250 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: NOR CAL
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I thought a KB was the stock supercharger. I didn't know they came with and eaton.I was talking about that power at the crank, NOT at the wheels. I also agree that if you want that much power and for it to be dependible you should have the bottom end beefed up. JLP has built short blocks available also that will handle over 1000hp.
The jonny lightning truck that is running in the 9's I believe is supercharged, and the twin turbo is the one in the 8's
 
  #5  
Old 05-03-2007, 08:00 PM
flareside_thunder's Avatar
flareside_thunder
flareside_thunder is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,757
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I got a buddy of mine with a Gen 1 lightning that has a 332 short block complete with Kenne Bell supercharger and a whole slew of other mods......it's makes 685 hp to the rear wheels....you fingure on the resistance through the tranny and rear and do the math.....he runs 11.5's but only because he doesn't have a cage...he got booted from a track for running 10.6's with no cage.....I'm old school so I prefer the older motors to the new......the new ones are to computer controlled for me...either a pro or a con....depending on your views.....on the other hand.....it wouldprobably be easier to get the 600 out of the modular seeing as how they come stock with what....331?As opposed to my 95 5.0 which came with 205......plus some mods so I probly got anywhere around 230 to 240.....haven't dynoed it yet.Go with the old school.......
 
  #6  
Old 05-03-2007, 08:01 PM
flareside_thunder's Avatar
flareside_thunder
flareside_thunder is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,757
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
oh yea...the brand spanking new ones ARE KB's.....funny howford kicked *** with the gen 1's......no SC's?????ha ha....HEEEERE HEMI HEMI HEMI......
 
  #7  
Old 05-03-2007, 09:52 PM
Stewart_H's Avatar
Stewart_H
Stewart_H is offline
Super Moderator
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Central Coast of CA
Posts: 29,376
Received 86 Likes on 79 Posts
Originally Posted by 1979FordF-250
I thought a KB was the stock supercharger. I didn't know they came with and eaton.I was talking about that power at the crank, NOT at the wheels.
That thought crossed my mind, that's why I used the term "at the wheels" in my post.

I also agree that if you want that much power and for it to be dependible you should have the bottom end beefed up. JLP has built short blocks available also that will handle over 1000hp.
I believe, like most builders, JLP only advertises a 900hp capable block. The Manley H-Beam rods, when 7/16 ARP rod bolts are used, are the determining factor. The Manley I-Beam rods are rated a tad higher.

The jonny lightning truck that is running in the 9's I believe is supercharged, and the twin turbo is the one in the 8's
One in the same truck. Last year, Johnny yanked the engine and started a new build, creating the twin turbo beast that powers his Gen 2. He also chopped the cab a couple years ago, lowering the profile a bit to reduce wind resistance. His new paint scheme is pretty nice too!

Stewart
 
  #8  
Old 05-03-2007, 09:56 PM
Stewart_H's Avatar
Stewart_H
Stewart_H is offline
Super Moderator
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Central Coast of CA
Posts: 29,376
Received 86 Likes on 79 Posts
Originally Posted by flareside_thunder
I'm old school so I prefer the older motors to the new......the new ones are to computer controlled for me...either a pro or a con....depending on your views.....on the other hand.....it wouldprobably be easier to get the 600 out of the modular...
Judging by the times posted at NLOC, the built Gen 1 trucks are still much easier to get into the 8's.

Those old pushrod engines can still put a whoopin' on the newer modular engined trucks.

Stewart
 
  #9  
Old 05-03-2007, 10:09 PM
darrin1999's Avatar
darrin1999
darrin1999 is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: fargo, nd
Posts: 1,526
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i say build a 460 stroked to 545, use a carb, keep it naturally aspirated, and have a lot more fun with more durability and for less money the shortblock only costs a little over 2000 dollars- and thats including machine work, then about 3500-4000 dollars in heads and valvetrane, and youll have your 600 horse- more if you cam it right.
 
  #10  
Old 05-03-2007, 10:20 PM
LxMan1's Avatar
LxMan1
LxMan1 is offline
Moderator

Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Louisville,Ky.
Posts: 22,436
Received 13 Likes on 13 Posts
Originally Posted by flareside_thunder
.it wouldprobably be easier to get the 600 out of the modular seeing as how they come stock with what....331?As opposed to my 95 5.0 which came with 205......plus some mods so I probly got anywhere around 230 to 240.....haven't dynoed it yet.Go with the old school.......
The Lightning was rated at 380hp.
Power 380 hp @ 4750 rpm
Torque 450 lb-ft @ 3250 rpm
 
  #11  
Old 05-03-2007, 11:38 PM
Stewart_H's Avatar
Stewart_H
Stewart_H is offline
Super Moderator
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Central Coast of CA
Posts: 29,376
Received 86 Likes on 79 Posts
Originally Posted by LxMan1
The Lightning was rated at 380hp.
Power 380 hp @ 4750 rpm
Torque 450 lb-ft @ 3250 rpm
Just to round out the above info, the power ratings for the '99 and '00 L's were 360hp and 440tq.

Stewart
 
  #12  
Old 05-06-2007, 08:36 PM
flareside_thunder's Avatar
flareside_thunder
flareside_thunder is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,757
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Just to clarify....I was referring to the standard F-150's not the Gen 2's.....
 
  #13  
Old 05-10-2007, 01:38 PM
Silver Streak's Avatar
Silver Streak
Silver Streak is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Broken Arrow, OK
Posts: 3,241
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by S_Harvey
Judging by the times posted at NLOC, the built Gen 1 trucks are still much easier to get into the 8's.
That might have something to do with the older trucks starting life almost 1000 lbs lighter than the newer ones. My 01 with me and just under half a tank weighs just under 5000 lbs. My 1990 F-150 (which is probably 300-400lbs lighter than a L1) weighs 3900 with me and my wife in it and one tank full.

FWIW, the stock power and torque ratings are a joke. Add about 30-40 to each and you are probably in the ball park.
 

Last edited by Silver Streak; 05-10-2007 at 01:41 PM.
  #14  
Old 05-22-2007, 10:58 PM
e9tac's Avatar
e9tac
e9tac is offline
Junior User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Washington State
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pushrods all the way!!!!
 
  #15  
Old 05-23-2007, 07:42 AM
Blurry94's Avatar
Blurry94
Blurry94 is offline
Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Calhoun GA
Posts: 3,477
Likes: 0
Received 45 Likes on 35 Posts
Originally Posted by Silver Streak
That might have something to do with the older trucks starting life almost 1000 lbs lighter than the newer ones. My 01 with me and just under half a tank weighs just under 5000 lbs. My 1990 F-150 (which is probably 300-400lbs lighter than a L1) weighs 3900 with me and my wife in it and one tank full.
The older models are a tad lighter, but the ones running 9's and 8's (GEN 1 & 2) have so much weight reduction which makes it hard to compare to a regular street driven rig; we're talking less than 4000lbs. My 94 weighs 4800lbs with me (about 200lbs) and 1/2 tank of gas. 3900lbs is on the light side for a stock F-150, that's almost 1000lbs lighter than my GEN 1...something isn't right about that scale reading. I know that the transmission type can make a difference, but nearly 1000lbs?
 


Quick Reply: 351w vs 5.4



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:42 AM.