Have you registered for your free membership? If not, click here now to register!
 

  
Join Our Site - Its free, quick and easy!
Click Here to join.   Click Here for more information
Users Chatting None

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Newer Light Duty Trucks > The 2009 F150
Register - Join us, its Free! FAQ Members List Timeslips Calendar Mark Forums Read

The 2009 F150 Discuss the new 2009 Ford F150





Is F-150 Still King?


 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 04-26-2007, 06:44 AM
Senior User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Derry, NH
Posts: 177
downhillpat is starting off with a positive reputation.
Trans Options...

Probably beating a dead horse here, but, they really do need to offer a 4x4 with a standard on the new F150. And it needs to have the ZF 6....sorry, BOTH ZF sixes... it seems quite impossible to kill either one. even the auto.

Thoughts" Comments ? Rants? Dumb Sayings????
   
__________________
Anyone ever notice that the Dodge logo looks like the female anatomy???
What seems to be the ossifer problem? I'm not as thunk as you drink I am...

1994 F250 XL 4x4 351W, EFI, ZF5, BW1356, 4.10
1987 F150 XL 4x4 351W, 4 bbl, C6, BW1345, 3.55
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 04-26-2007, 06:50 AM
LxMan1's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Louisville,Ky.
Posts: 18,295
LxMan1 is a splendid one to beholdLxMan1 is a splendid one to beholdLxMan1 is a splendid one to beholdLxMan1 is a splendid one to beholdLxMan1 is a splendid one to beholdLxMan1 is a splendid one to beholdLxMan1 is a splendid one to behold
The more gears the better
__________________
Jimmy- FTE Moderator
Support FTE....Online Store
88 5.0 LX Mustang
63 F100 351W/C6

Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 04-26-2007, 07:24 AM
the_webers_inc's Avatar
A mostly quiet
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: N.E. Iowa - 4x4 Country
Posts: 136
the_webers_inc is starting off with a positive reputation.
I think it would be great to see a ZF 6spd Stick in the F-150. It would be awesome having the "L" creeper gear. Besides space concerns, is there really any reason why they can't offer this transmission in the 1/2 ton? I assume that the 3v 5.4 that they use in the Super duties is the same/has the same bell housing as the 5.4 in the F-150. Seems pretty straight forward....


Except of course there supposedly is not enough demand for a Manual transmission offering w/ the v8 or 4x4 packages.

I really wish the F-150's were just a lighter copy of the Super Duties: Solid axles, lockable hubs, manual transmission available with all engine options, etc.

All things aside, I am quite happy with my '06 F-150, I does feel a little too much like a car, but it will still pull a trailer like the older fords.

T. J.
__________________
06 F-150 XLT Scab, 6.5' Box, 5.4L, 4x4, 3.73LS

--Line-X
--TruXedo Original
--Nifty Catch-All Xtreme Floorliners
--2008 Telescoping Trailer Tow Mirrors

03 Saturn VUE SUV 2.2L Ecotec I4, 5spd - 23/29 mpg - The Commute Vehicle

95 F150 XLT 4x4 4.9L I6 5spd - Sold
89 F150 XLT 4x4 4.9L I6 4spd - Sold
91 F150 XLT 4x4 4.9L I6 5spd - Deceased
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 04-26-2007, 04:01 PM
Junior User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 80
ec_fritz is starting off with a positive reputation.
At this point I'd settle for any kind of manual trans.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 04-26-2007, 05:18 PM
preppypyro's Avatar
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Saskatoon Sk.
Posts: 21,394
preppypyro has a very good reputation on FTE.preppypyro has a very good reputation on FTE.preppypyro has a very good reputation on FTE.preppypyro has a very good reputation on FTE.
Makes a guy wonder why they never did come out with a 6 speed manual in the f150. I mean you will never get away from guys that love manuals, and like lxman said, the more gears the better.
__________________
$Sheldon$
2003 F-250 supercab shortbox 4x4 lariat
~Everythings legal man as long as ya dont get caught~
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 04-29-2007, 10:19 PM
Junior User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 81
GMconvert is starting off with a positive reputation.
Any manual trans would be good! Us Americans are soooo lazy!!! Did anyone see the American Choppers episode when they were in London? Hell, the minivan they were driving even had a manual, or it appeared to have one.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 05-01-2007, 05:41 AM
Senior User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: New England
Posts: 104
95250mac is starting off with a positive reputation.
G.M. has no manual offering on any full size truck now!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 05-06-2007, 12:16 AM
Senior User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 113
devja71 is starting off with a positive reputation.
u's will hate me for saying this, but i like the cvt idea. (ahem-enclosed snowmobile clutch). it's an auto w/o all the torq converter/fluid and such. i imagine we'd might want to get used to the idea cause the new smaller cars (eg-nissan sentra) have the cvt and it's likely the future of auto tranny's. i like the cvt idea except for the boring sound of the engine constant rpm w/o going thru the gears. but if we get used to it, it might be ok. anyone imagine jumping on a kickass polaris and shifting a 6spd manual? most quads have snomobile clutches now ('xept sportquads obviously) and who would go back to a 5spd auto clutch? just my 0.02
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 05-06-2007, 09:01 AM
Junior User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 81
GMconvert is starting off with a positive reputation.
I don't care much for CVTs. Everything I have read says they get "manual like" economy, but still not as good as a manual. So it sounds like the manual is still the best way to go. Unfortunately I am in the minority, since very few vehicles are available with manual tranmissions these days.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 05-06-2007, 01:18 PM
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,377
rollerstud98 is starting off with a positive reputation.
wasn't it just in the last year that automatics finally surpassed manuals for overall sales worldwide or something like that?
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 05-06-2007, 02:42 PM
Junior User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 81
GMconvert is starting off with a positive reputation.
As far as worldwide, I don't know. I know that very few new US cars/trucks have the option for a manual transmission.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 05-07-2007, 01:47 PM
Senior User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 113
devja71 is starting off with a positive reputation.
i'm sure they could make a good cvt, with a clutch-lock that locks it into a steady speed gear with the cruise on. i kinda guessed the cvt idea wouldn't impress many p/u folks. but i like it
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 05-07-2007, 01:59 PM
pfogle's Avatar
Village idiot
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Oak Harbor, OH
Posts: 7,172
pfogle is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Actually a CVT makes the most sense. Think about it, the engine is NEVER out of it's power band. You'd have full torque to move a load right as soon as you hit the gas. I think the CVT is a great idea for a truck. The problem is that they are having strength issue with them..
__________________
1992 E150, 351, 1 ton E4OD (RIP)

Courtesy of my WIFE: "Why do they call it 'scruff' when it's more like mini-daggers?"
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 05-07-2007, 05:52 PM
Junior User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 81
GMconvert is starting off with a positive reputation.
A CVT sounds good in theory, but I'll pass on them myself. I for one want the driving experience, I like shifting gears!
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 05-07-2007, 09:09 PM
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,072
duramaximizer is new and has a neutral reputation at this point.
No, strength is not an issue, combine durability with weight is the issue. If weight wasn't an issue in vehicles, then we would have it right now. Look at the tractors, John Deere, JCB, Fendt, Valtra, Agco, MF, etc etc wouldn't all have CVT's in tractors right now if they couldn't make them heavy duty enough. Besides in a comparable tractor, CVT's double fuel economy.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:06 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 1997-2008 Internet Brands, Inc.

Ford-Trucks.com and Internet Brands, Inc. is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company.
© 1997-2007 Internet Brands, Inc., Please see our Terms of Use / Privacy Policy