Ford vs The Competition Technical discussion and comparison ONLY. Trolls will not be tolerated.

Honda Ridgeline is a "truck"?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #106  
Old 07-12-2007, 09:52 AM
osbornk's Avatar
osbornk
osbornk is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Marion, VA
Posts: 2,511
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rangerfan
I'd rather drive a Yugo then that thing.
You apparently have not driven a YUGO.
 
  #107  
Old 07-12-2007, 10:05 AM
jimandmandy's Avatar
jimandmandy
jimandmandy is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Running Springs CA
Posts: 5,228
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by V8EXPLR
Just paid a visit to the Ridgeline forum... One was even talking about how his Ridgeline towed better than a Suburban 3500...
If the Suburban had the 5.7 you would understand. I had the misfortune of renting a GMC 3500 van with the 5.7 and it could barely get out of its own way, empty.

Jim
 
  #108  
Old 07-12-2007, 08:47 PM
rangerfan's Avatar
rangerfan
rangerfan is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Southeastern Indiana
Posts: 1,958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by osbornk
You apparently have not driven a YUGO.
I had one in high school. Have you ever heard the song "Piece of S--t Car" by Adam Sandler? I think he wrote it about my Yugo.
 
  #109  
Old 07-13-2007, 12:37 PM
conger's Avatar
conger
conger is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Edmonton, AB.
Posts: 1,028
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That 2nd link is the one I was referring to in my earlier post. Lord I would not trust that trailer on the back of that Honda. It's overweighted first of all and the driver stated he still hand plenty of power, even on hills. So the reviews that state the Ridgeline is a slug when loaded must be wrong. I'm also wondering what kind of hills he was climbing, cause here in CO he'd have one heck of a time trying to climb some of the passes here with that it loaded like that.

Oh well, to each their own.[/QUOTE]

I'd be interested in seeing the Vin plate on that trailer. I've got a 28 footer that weighs in at about 8500 lbs. I have a hard time believing that 27 footer is only 4700 lbs. Maybe with all tanks empty and nothing in it. Kind of like the way it was shipped from the manufacturer.
 
  #110  
Old 07-16-2007, 08:37 AM
DonJames's Avatar
DonJames
DonJames is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by NumberDummy
The Fridgeline is built off the Honda Pilot SUV platform...
...and the same as the Odyssey (mini-van) too! Yea, thats a real 'truck'.

Originally Posted by 65f100_352
....This guy thinks he has a real truck:
http://www.ridgelineownersclub.com/f...ead.php?t=7655 .....
I dont believe it. I know a guy who has one. Empty, the 'thang' (not 'truck') is very level (front and rear is same height). For this reason, that trailer is not sitting on the rear, so there is no tongue weight. Unless they have added air bags or something, which I doubt, there is a jack somewhere holding up the trailer. You can see that with the trailer tandems as far back as they are, there would be a lot of tongue weight. Now would you like to be decending down a 6+% hill in that set-up? Very unsafe! These guys have no clue what a real 'truck' is.

Originally Posted by 65f100_352
...I really think it is a car with all wheel drive, and a "bed". not a truck...
More like an open trunk car.
 
  #111  
Old 07-16-2007, 09:20 AM
krewat's Avatar
krewat
krewat is offline
Site Administrator
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Long Island USA
Posts: 42,561
Received 297 Likes on 156 Posts
Saw one the other day, towing a boat, couldn't have been bigger than 19 foot, outboard, nice new trailer, MAYBE 5000 lbs total. And, MAYBE the tonque weight wasn't set right, but the trailer looked perfect. 20% tonque at most, MAYBE 1000 lbs.

It was squatting so bad, it was almost funny. Except for the safety aspect.

If that thing has a 1550 lbs payload, does that mean ON the bumpstops?
 
  #112  
Old 07-16-2007, 09:58 PM
DonJames's Avatar
DonJames
DonJames is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by krewat
Saw one the other day, towing a boat...It was squatting so bad, it was almost funny. Except for the safety aspect...
I have always been a firm believer that you must buy what you want. Because you must pay for the payments, insurance and taxes. Because you must look at it. Because you must deal with it on a day to day basis. You must be happy. But, c'mon, dont buy something and act like it is something it is really NOT! Why purchase a Ridgeline and then treat it like a real truck? It wont last long, not to mention the safety aspect.
 

Last edited by DonJames; 07-16-2007 at 10:01 PM.
  #113  
Old 07-17-2007, 04:34 AM
DOHCmarauder's Avatar
DOHCmarauder
DOHCmarauder is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 4,074
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DonJames
..
I dont believe it. I know a guy who has one. Empty, the 'thang' (not 'truck') is very level (front and rear is same height). For this reason, that trailer is not sitting on the rear, so there is no tongue weight. Unless they have added air bags or something, which I doubt, there is a jack somewhere holding up the trailer. You can see that with the trailer tandems as far back as they are, there would be a lot of tongue weight.

Originally Posted by krewat
Saw one the other day, towing a boat, couldn't have been bigger than 19 foot, outboard, nice new trailer, MAYBE 5000 lbs total. And, MAYBE the tonque weight wasn't set right, but the trailer looked perfect. 20% tonque at most, MAYBE 1000 lbs.

It was squatting so bad, it was almost funny. Except for the safety aspect.

If that thing has a 1550 lbs payload, does that mean ON the bumpstops?





I guess some people have never heard of weight equilization hitches.....




[here's hoping that site doesn't start making fun of the posts at FTE]
 

Last edited by DOHCmarauder; 07-17-2007 at 04:38 AM.
  #114  
Old 07-17-2007, 07:58 AM
SMIGGS's Avatar
SMIGGS
SMIGGS is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,452
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DonJames
I have always been a firm believer that you must buy what you want. Because you must pay for the payments, insurance and taxes. Because you must look at it. Because you must deal with it on a day to day basis. You must be happy.
Wow, truer words have never been spoken. ( blantanly obvious more like it....)

Originally Posted by DonJames
But, c'mon, dont buy something and act like it is something it is really NOT! Why purchase a Ridgeline and then treat it like a real truck? It wont last long, not to mention the safety aspect.
I guess on the flip side of your comment here, how many people buy a 1/2 ton truck regardless of make and actually "treat it like a real truck"? You could replace "Ridgeline" with "Canyon"or "Ranger".
 

Last edited by SMIGGS; 07-17-2007 at 08:04 AM.
  #115  
Old 07-17-2007, 08:20 AM
DOHCmarauder's Avatar
DOHCmarauder
DOHCmarauder is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 4,074
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SMIGGS



I guess on the flip side of your comment here, how many people buy a 1/2 ton truck regardless of make and actually "treat it like a real truck"? You could replace "Ridgeline" with "Canyon"or "Ranger".

Or how about F-650 owners dissin' on F350 owners; or F-350 owners dissin' on 1/2 ton owners????

This is one of those threads that makes me wonder why so many people feel threatened
 
  #116  
Old 07-17-2007, 08:27 AM
V8EXPLR's Avatar
V8EXPLR
V8EXPLR is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Denver USA
Posts: 819
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SMIGGS
You could replace "Ridgeline" with "Canyon"or "Ranger".
In some aspects I could agree with this comment (like towing within the mid-size/compact truck segment), but the issue I'm looking at is the Canyon and Ranger, or Tacoma and Frontier, can actually do some off-road work/fun, while the Ridgeline isn't nearly as capable by what I've read/seen.

Like others have stated, buy what you like, otherwise you'll be unhappy in the long run. Some like it, some don't. Just don't try to sell me on the Ridgeline being a bad ars off-roading machine or can tow with the 1/2 ton and up market.

Simply put, it is what it is.
 
  #117  
Old 07-17-2007, 12:36 PM
krewat's Avatar
krewat
krewat is offline
Site Administrator
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Long Island USA
Posts: 42,561
Received 297 Likes on 156 Posts
Originally Posted by DOHCmarauder
This is one of those threads that makes me wonder why so many people feel threatened
Threatened?

So far, what I've read in this thread, it's just plain hilarious
 
  #118  
Old 07-17-2007, 08:06 PM
DOHCmarauder's Avatar
DOHCmarauder
DOHCmarauder is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 4,074
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by krewat
Threatened?

So far, what I've read in this thread, it's just plain hilarious

You're right; but you'll find a lot of same stories here:

150's towing a gazillion pounds.

People winning races against Buggatis(sp?) in their Super Duties.

People's opinions are, of course, expected.


I'm just having a hard time with the "manly" comments or how "my" truck is soooo much more of a real truck.


Or when people say things about squatting when there's clearly an equalizing hitch in the pictures.



I "think" the point Smiggy was making is what I'm jumping on:

People on Peterbuilttractorenthisiast.net would look kinda silly bragging about how wimpy our 3/4 and 1 ton trucks are.
 
  #119  
Old 07-18-2007, 03:58 AM
65f100_352's Avatar
65f100_352
65f100_352 is offline
More Turbo
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 572
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by DOHCmarauder
People on Peterbuilttractorenthisiast.net would look kinda silly bragging about how wimpy our 3/4 and 1 ton trucks are.
Indeed wise grasshopper, but we don't try to tow 80,000lbs with our trucks. I think it is funny that owners of the Ridgeline load them up past what they were designed for. My moms 99 F250 SD had a cord of wood on it and barely squatted because thats a load it was designed for.
 
  #120  
Old 07-18-2007, 04:04 AM
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
NumberDummy is offline
Ford Parts Specialist

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Simi Valley, CA
Posts: 88,826
Received 648 Likes on 543 Posts
Originally Posted by DOHCmarauder
People winning races against Buggatis(sp?) in their Super Duties.
Buggati's were notorious for having terrible brakes. When someone asked Ettore Buggati why, he said: "I build them to go, not to stop!"
 


Quick Reply: Honda Ridgeline is a "truck"?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:57 PM.