Washington Chapter Washington Chapter
Join Chapter, Leader: Yahiko

We Want You! Folding Info & FAQs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #31  
Old 04-26-2007, 09:56 PM
Placermike's Avatar
Placermike
Placermike is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sequim, WA
Posts: 4,287
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Washington Chapter FTE
Date of last work unit2007-04-26 19:17:35 Active CPUs within 50 days4 Team Id65446 Grand Score2752 (certificate) Work Unit Count11 (certificate) Team Ranking (incl. aggregate)16787 of 62708Home Pagehttps://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/forum188/

Team membersRank
(within team)User Score WU 1 Placermike 1822 6 2 oneminizut 930 5
 
  #32  
Old 04-29-2007, 02:41 AM
Placermike's Avatar
Placermike
Placermike is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sequim, WA
Posts: 4,287
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exclamation

Washington Chapter FTE
Date of last work unit2007-04-26 19:17:35 Active CPUs within 50 days4 Team Id65446 Grand Score2752 (certificate) Work Unit Count11 (certificate) Team Ranking (incl. aggregate)16960 of 63209Home Pagehttps://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/forum188/


We are doing good, but need support from the chapter members!
 
  #33  
Old 04-29-2007, 08:56 AM
RexB's Avatar
RexB
RexB is offline
Posting Guru
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,692
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Congrats Mike

I started this thread and Folding FAQ to ask FTE members here to join the Ford FTE Folding team #53449, but have at it. Getting the research returned to Stanford University any way we can is the most important thing

Keep on Tru.....and Folding :~)
 
  #34  
Old 04-29-2007, 05:08 PM
Placermike's Avatar
Placermike
Placermike is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sequim, WA
Posts: 4,287
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RexB
Congrats Mike

I started this thread and Folding FAQ to ask FTE members here to join the Ford FTE Folding team #53449, but have at it. Getting the research returned to Stanford University any way we can is the most important thing

Keep on Tru.....and Folding :~)
I didn't mean to take your thread over, but hope you understand that I am very 'Chapter' supportive!
 
  #35  
Old 05-01-2007, 11:43 PM
Placermike's Avatar
Placermike
Placermike is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sequim, WA
Posts: 4,287
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Date of last work unit2007-04-30 11:11:17 Active CPUs within 50 days4 Team Id65446 Grand Score2958 (certificate) Work Unit Count12 (certificate) Team Ranking (incl. aggregate)16842 of 63743Home Pagehttps://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/forum188/
 
  #36  
Old 05-31-2007, 01:18 AM
Placermike's Avatar
Placermike
Placermike is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sequim, WA
Posts: 4,287
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is anyone else working on a protein that takes forever?...My current one is supposed to finish on 3 Jul 07...55 days to complete!
 
  #37  
Old 06-01-2007, 03:38 AM
nighthawk285's Avatar
nighthawk285
nighthawk285 is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: La Grande, OR
Posts: 2,442
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
what is your amount of processing power that you are sending to the folding process? The biggest one I have had to do was 10,000 frames, and it only took 4 days, with 90% processor power devoted to it....on a laptop.
 
  #38  
Old 06-01-2007, 07:41 PM
Placermike's Avatar
Placermike
Placermike is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sequim, WA
Posts: 4,287
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Been running about 40% with a 3.2 Ghz processor...In the past most took 2-4 days. I did select to accept larger projects, and got this one. The time for each frame went seconds to hours.
 
  #39  
Old 06-02-2007, 11:58 AM
RexB's Avatar
RexB
RexB is offline
Posting Guru
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,692
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Configure it to 98% processing Mike, this 2.4GHz Athlon has been doing it for years, it has never interfered with anything, ie: movie making, gaming, image editing, CAD, nuttin'.

Takes 52 hours max to proc a "Large WU".
 
  #40  
Old 06-03-2007, 10:44 AM
Placermike's Avatar
Placermike
Placermike is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sequim, WA
Posts: 4,287
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Will give it a shot...Have 19964 frames to go on the current unit. Est end date 23 Jul. 26 minutes and some odd seconds per frame if the thing is accurate.

Looks like they gave me a new bug to play with...the last only had 4000 frames.
 

Last edited by Placermike; 06-03-2007 at 10:53 AM.
  #41  
Old 06-03-2007, 11:38 AM
RexB's Avatar
RexB
RexB is offline
Posting Guru
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,692
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The Folding might abort Early Unit End when you change the processor load...sometimes it did, sometimes it didn't on my puter until I found it's sweet spot at using 98% processing power.

But finishing July 23rd hurts, so I'd change it now, your next Large WU will proc much faster. I'm doing P241X's at about 9m30s a frame.

(It still is set at the Lowest Proc Priority so doesn't impede any other processing going on.)
 
  #42  
Old 06-03-2007, 01:59 PM
Placermike's Avatar
Placermike
Placermike is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sequim, WA
Posts: 4,287
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Got her down to 2 minutes 31 secs per frame, but only got me back to Jul 8.
100% low priority.
 
  #43  
Old 06-03-2007, 09:39 PM
RexB's Avatar
RexB
RexB is offline
Posting Guru
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,692
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Spit out the WU Packet number already for comparison {P????), get a new computer, or
 
  #44  
Old 06-06-2007, 12:56 PM
RexB's Avatar
RexB
RexB is offline
Posting Guru
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,692
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
My last post was rude, sorry, why didn't you tell me to PO or something? I got a little frustrated with no information about what your Large WU P# was (like P2416 or P2914 to make a processing time comparison with other rigs.)
Originally Posted by Placermike
Will give it a shot {increasing cpu usage from 40% to 98%}...Have 19964 frames to go on the current unit. Est end date 23 Jul. 26 minutes and some odd seconds per frame if the thing is accurate.

Looks like they gave me a new bug to play with...the last only had 4000 frames.
-
Got her down to 2 minutes 31 secs per frame, but only got me back to Jul 8. 100% low priority.
All other things being equal like the CPU single core, CPU % usage and processing priority, the number of atoms in a protein is the main qualifier as to how fast the protein processes (i'm pretty sure.)

After re-setting the processing CPU usage, FAH takes several hours to recompute the processing finish time of the WU.

Check out the FAH forum and faqs links in my post at the beginning of the thread, there's a lot of answers there.

I'm looking forward to a core2duo for faster Folding and image creation/editing...maybe afford a top-knotch ATI GPU to go with it and knock off even more WU's.
 
  #45  
Old 06-06-2007, 08:51 PM
Placermike's Avatar
Placermike
Placermike is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sequim, WA
Posts: 4,287
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RexB
My last post was rude, sorry, why didn't you tell me to PO or something? I got a little frustrated with no information about what your Large WU P# was (like P2416 or P2914 to make a processing time comparison with other rigs.)

All other things being equal like the CPU single core, CPU % usage and processing priority, the number of atoms in a protein is the main qualifier as to how fast the protein processes (i'm pretty sure.)

After re-setting the processing CPU usage, FAH takes several hours to recompute the processing finish time of the WU.

Check out the FAH forum and faqs links in my post at the beginning of the thread, there's a lot of answers there.

I'm looking forward to a core2duo for faster Folding and image creation/editing...maybe afford a top-knotch ATI GPU to go with it and knock off even more WU's.
Not sure about all that...Just let the 'bug' run. Here is the info I got from the log.

[18:43:48] Project: 2125 (Run 103, Clone 65, Gen 8)
[18:43:48]
[18:43:48] Assembly optimizations on if available.
[18:43:48] Entering M.D.
[18:44:08] (Starting from checkpoint)
[18:44:08] Protein: p2125_lambda_5way_melt_4_10011
[18:44:08]
[18:44:08] Writing local files
[18:44:08] Using table 1
[18:44:08] Completed 109189 out of 20000000 steps (1)

Don't kow if this is what you were asking about.


Mike
 


Quick Reply: We Want You! Folding Info & FAQs



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:57 AM.