Have you registered for your free membership? If not, click here now to register!
 

  
Join Our Site - Its free, quick and easy!
Click Here to join.   Click Here for more information
Users Chatting None

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Diesel > 2010 4.4L Ford Diesel
Register - Join us, its Free! FAQ Members List Timeslips Calendar Mark Forums Read

2010 4.4L Ford Diesel Discuss the upcoming 4.4L Ford diesel engine





Is F-150 Still King?


 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #46 (permalink)  
Old 04-16-2008, 07:28 PM
parkland's Avatar
Elder User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 684
parkland is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
manitoba-

Thats a liter. As in 1.22 per LITER.
__________________
2002 7.3 PSD 4x4 Nothing out of the ordinary.
1990 Chev 1/2 Completely normal.
Reply With Quote
  #47 (permalink)  
Old 04-16-2008, 07:31 PM
MisterCMK's Avatar
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Fargo, ND and Twin Cities
Posts: 6,180
MisterCMK is a name known to allMisterCMK is a name known to allMisterCMK is a name known to allMisterCMK is a name known to allMisterCMK is a name known to allMisterCMK is a name known to all
So that would be around $4.61 USD per gallon for gasoline and $4.69 USD per gallon of diesel. I am surprised that they are that close.
__________________
Chris
1994 Mustang GT
1992 Explorer XLT
2000 Expedition EB

Quote:
Originally Posted by tcbofade
I have no brain
Reply With Quote
  #48 (permalink)  
Old 04-16-2008, 07:53 PM
parkland's Avatar
Elder User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 684
parkland is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
dont be suprised about nothing man, I recently stopped workin in the oilfield. One thing i'll tell you is that whenever prices go lower, they just stop pumping. they make their own "demand".
__________________
2002 7.3 PSD 4x4 Nothing out of the ordinary.
1990 Chev 1/2 Completely normal.
Reply With Quote
  #49 (permalink)  
Old 04-17-2008, 01:29 AM
Elder User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 566
mnmwhit is starting off with a positive reputation.
I don't think they would make enough power for the EXPY (too heavy) but great power plant for the Sport Trac, Explorer, Ranger, hmmmmm Ford 500 maybe?

Quote:
Originally Posted by jmaskew View Post
Here's the specs"
The 2.5L Engine gets 28.7 mpg
The 3.0L Engine gets 26 mpg

Wouldn't these engines be great in the Ford Explorer and the Expedition?
__________________
Max W

06 F-350 4X4 6.0 PSD NORTH POLE, ALASKA
Mobil-1 5-40 turbo diesel truck oil from day #1
98 gallon transfer flow tank
Leer topper insulated
MBRP SS409 turbo back Off-Road duel exhaust-CAT IS GONE
AstroStart 2-way Auto start
Go Rhino pushbar/brushguard,4-9" Lite-Force moose lites
Reply With Quote
  #50 (permalink)  
Old 04-17-2008, 07:56 AM
Senior User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Henderson, NV
Posts: 324
jmaskew is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mnmwhit View Post
I don't think they would make enough power for the EXPY (too heavy) but great power plant for the Sport Trac, Explorer, Ranger, hmmmmm Ford 500 maybe?
This is a bit off topic, but take a look at this article. It's interesting to see how many miles you can squeeze out of a diesel engine.
Toyota Ireland - D-4D Clean Power
__________________

2004 F250 PSD SB King Ranch 4x4:Build Date: 01/23/2004
Dieselsite Coolant Bypass Filter
Fumoto Oil Drain Valve
Quad overhead pod:Isspro 40 PSI Boost, Water Temp, Oil Temp and Trans Temp
Reply With Quote
  #51 (permalink)  
Old 04-18-2008, 01:30 PM
parkland's Avatar
Elder User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 684
parkland is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Everyone has HP ratings buzzing in their heads nowadays. Look at the old 70 passenger school buses and other large vehicles powered by 6.9idi, 7.3idi, cummins5.9, all had 150-180 hp and they got the job done.

Ford should build a reliable, easy to service engine, that gets good fuel mileage and decent power, but leave the 300+ hp tunes for enthusiasts.
__________________
2002 7.3 PSD 4x4 Nothing out of the ordinary.
1990 Chev 1/2 Completely normal.
Reply With Quote
  #52 (permalink)  
Old 04-19-2008, 11:59 PM
Senior User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: E Washington
Posts: 172
bookem15 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by parkland View Post
Everyone has HP ratings buzzing in their heads nowadays. Look at the old 70 passenger school buses and other large vehicles powered by 6.9idi, 7.3idi, cummins5.9, all had 150-180 hp and they got the job done.

Ford should build a reliable, easy to service engine, that gets good fuel mileage and decent power, but leave the 300+ hp tunes for enthusiasts.
I could not agree more BUT they will not do that HP sells now days. If the people at ford that are going to design these engines had a job that they needed a truck for but did not make the money they make now I would have to say the the MPG's would be more of a concern.
__________________
Drive it like ya stole it !!!
1997 F150 xtra cab 3 door 4X4 104,000

next truck
really really WANT F350 Harley edition
6.4 psd CC LB w/all the goodies

but

F150 with the diesel and the goodies
is all I really NEED!!
Reply With Quote
  #53 (permalink)  
Old 04-20-2008, 08:19 AM
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,328
origcharger is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by parkland View Post
Everyone has HP ratings buzzing in their heads nowadays. Look at the old 70 passenger school buses and other large vehicles powered by 6.9idi, 7.3idi, cummins5.9, all had 150-180 hp and they got the job done.

.
Excuse me but our first diesel was a 1985 International 6.9idi with a 59 passenger bus body. It had something like 165 hp and about 320 ft lbs of torque. With a 6.50 to 1 axle you had it reving like a gas engine to go anywhere. It was marginal on power empty, pathetic fully loaded and stay away from the hills. Fuel mileage was an improvement over gas but not that impressive. It never got more than 500 miles without using a quart of oil and consumption got bad enough that IH rerung it just before it went out of warranty around 50,000 miles. It dropped a valve at 100,000 miles and split a cylinder wall. Put a reman engine in it and it had a roller cam follower disintegrate at 50,000 miles. Last I saw the bus it was on its way to salvage yard.
__________________
Powerstroking Seven T444Es, one VT365 and one 6.0. Also four DT466s, one DT360 and a Mercedes MBE906.


I'm doing my part to reduce food imports, control rising food costs and help feed the children, my trucks run on 100% petroleum diesel. What are you doing?
Reply With Quote
  #54 (permalink)  
Old 04-20-2008, 01:13 PM
New User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 4
iwannaford is starting off with a positive reputation.
the 6.7 cummins is actually 350 H.P and 650 torque
Reply With Quote
  #55 (permalink)  
Old 04-20-2008, 02:56 PM
Elder User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Fitzpatrick Alabama
Posts: 586
AndysFords is starting off with a positive reputation.
The problem with all these new engines is they are trying to squeeze too much MPG and HorsePower out of the same engine, the also choking it down with emissions garbage on top of that.
__________________
1997 F250 Crew Cab 4x4
1988 F350 7.3 Crew Cab 4x4 Dually C6 w/ GearVendors Overdrive currently in a deep sleep until motor overhaul is finished. 1984 F250 2 wheel drive 6.9 Extended cab 4 spd manual. (3) 1976 F250 Reg Cab 4x4 All 390, two C6 and one 4 spd.
Reply With Quote
  #56 (permalink)  
Old 04-25-2008, 07:50 PM
ncl ncl is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Green Springs, OH
Posts: 338
ncl is starting off with a positive reputation.
Why is Ford hell bent on putting a diesel in the F150 no one wants to buy a diesel now cause of the price, As was said in an earlier post the cost difference in fuel out weighs the mpg increase not to mention the cost for oil changes. I dont want to start anything but I think all this sudden rise in fuel prices the last few years is a ploy by are Almighty Government, to one make money, and to force the going green thing down all our throats. I hate to say it but this whole fuel crisis started on 9/11/01 the price shot up I think 20 or 30 cents cause every one was scared and rushed to the pumps and stores just seems to snow ball from there involving other Global Conflicts. Just makes you wander huh? "It's big s@*t sandwich and we're all gonna take a bite"
__________________
NATRON
1977 F150 Ranger XLT 4x4,400
Reply With Quote
  #57 (permalink)  
Old 04-25-2008, 09:41 PM
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,328
origcharger is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ncl View Post
Why is Ford hell bent on putting a diesel in the F150 no one wants to buy a diesel now cause of the price, As was said in an earlier post the cost difference in fuel out weighs the mpg increase not to mention the cost for oil changes.
Do you really know how much oil changes will cost on a diesel F150?
__________________
Powerstroking Seven T444Es, one VT365 and one 6.0. Also four DT466s, one DT360 and a Mercedes MBE906.


I'm doing my part to reduce food imports, control rising food costs and help feed the children, my trucks run on 100% petroleum diesel. What are you doing?
Reply With Quote
  #58 (permalink)  
Old 04-26-2008, 08:43 AM
ncl ncl is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Green Springs, OH
Posts: 338
ncl is starting off with a positive reputation.
No I dont but diesels usually take about twice the amount of oil a gas engine does. My fathers 6.0 stroke takes about 4 gallons of oil so maybe the 4.4 maybe 2.5 to 3 gal maybe.
__________________
NATRON
1977 F150 Ranger XLT 4x4,400
Reply With Quote
  #59 (permalink)  
Old 04-26-2008, 11:47 AM
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,328
origcharger is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ncl View Post
No I dont but diesels usually take about twice the amount of oil a gas engine does. My fathers 6.0 stroke takes about 4 gallons of oil so maybe the 4.4 maybe 2.5 to 3 gal maybe.

Our 6.2 GM diesel took 7 quarts.
__________________
Powerstroking Seven T444Es, one VT365 and one 6.0. Also four DT466s, one DT360 and a Mercedes MBE906.


I'm doing my part to reduce food imports, control rising food costs and help feed the children, my trucks run on 100% petroleum diesel. What are you doing?
Reply With Quote
  #60 (permalink)  
Old 04-26-2008, 11:15 PM
kermmydog's Avatar
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: EXIT 105
Posts: 2,155
kermmydog has a very good reputation on FTE.kermmydog has a very good reputation on FTE.kermmydog has a very good reputation on FTE.kermmydog has a very good reputation on FTE.
Smile

Quote:
Originally Posted by parkland View Post
Everyone has HP ratings buzzing in their heads nowadays. Look at the old 70 passenger school buses and other large vehicles powered by 6.9idi, 7.3idi, cummins5.9, all had 150-180 hp and they got the job done.

Ford should build a reliable, easy to service engine, that gets good fuel mileage and decent power, but leave the 300+ hp tunes for enthusiasts.
I also couldn't agree more. I would be nice if Ford built an I-6 that was easy to work on & reliable. I dislike the navstars all of them. The 6.9 early 7.3 weren't too bad.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:36 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 1997-2008 Internet Brands, Inc.

Ford-Trucks.com and Internet Brands, Inc. is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company.
© 1997-2007 Internet Brands, Inc., Please see our Terms of Use / Privacy Policy