Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Misc. > Alternative Fuels, Hybrids & Mileage
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?


Welcome to Ford-Trucks Forums!
Welcome to Ford-Trucks.com.

You are currently viewing our forums as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Ford-Trucks Forums community today!





 
Reply
 
 
 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 04-03-2007, 10:09 AM
fordtough3521 fordtough3521 is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 16
fordtough3521 is starting off with a positive reputation.
K & N intake worth the money?

My dad mentioned to me that he was thinking about installing a K & N system in his 04 F250 in order to improve gas mileage. He asked me if I knew a rough quesstimate as to how much of a gain he would get, but I really didn't know. With the price of the kit he'd rather not do it unless it's going to give him a noticeable gain. Anyone out there have an opinion as to whether it'll be worth the money or not?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-03-2007, 10:23 AM
rsylvstr rsylvstr is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Central NY
Posts: 2,723
rsylvstr has a very good reputation on FTE.rsylvstr has a very good reputation on FTE.rsylvstr has a very good reputation on FTE.rsylvstr has a very good reputation on FTE.
that is the age old question that everyone will debate.
with my mods, i say that i have increased throttle response and CAN get better mileage if i stay off the gas....if i get on it, my mileage drops dramatically.

the one thing he will notice, even without a chip or aftermarket exhaust is the throttle response. i put in the K&N Series 77 kit...love it.
__________________
Master Chief, HMCM(FMF/AW)
JOIN US http://www.nyfirearms.com/forums/ind...eferrerid=1780
The best battlefield medicine is fire superiority
2001 SCrew Lariat 4x4 5.4L 4R70W 3.55 's LS
Conti eco tires, K&N Series 77 CAI
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-03-2007, 11:20 PM
jimandmandy jimandmandy is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Running Springs CA
Posts: 5,228
jimandmandy has a great reputation on FTE.jimandmandy has a great reputation on FTE.jimandmandy has a great reputation on FTE.jimandmandy has a great reputation on FTE.jimandmandy has a great reputation on FTE.
In a word, NO.

Modern EFI engines are carefully designed by Ford and others for power, economy and emissions. K&N can flow more air than stock, if you need to run wide open throttle most of the time in racing or pulling maximum loads, at the expense of more engine wear from the extra dirt that flows with the air. As far as fuel economy is concerned, how is a different air filter going to make a difference when the computer automatically adjusts the mixture? It is just not the same as a 1970's carbed engine. As a special bonus, K&N can cause problems due to oil getting on the MAF wire.

Jim
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-04-2007, 07:39 AM
rsylvstr rsylvstr is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Central NY
Posts: 2,723
rsylvstr has a very good reputation on FTE.rsylvstr has a very good reputation on FTE.rsylvstr has a very good reputation on FTE.rsylvstr has a very good reputation on FTE.
if you take care of the K&N properly, aka: proper oiling, you won't have to worry about the MAF getting dirty.

plus, the Series 77 just looks so damn nice
__________________
Master Chief, HMCM(FMF/AW)
JOIN US http://www.nyfirearms.com/forums/ind...eferrerid=1780
The best battlefield medicine is fire superiority
2001 SCrew Lariat 4x4 5.4L 4R70W 3.55 's LS
Conti eco tires, K&N Series 77 CAI
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-04-2007, 08:49 AM
fordtough3521 fordtough3521 is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 16
fordtough3521 is starting off with a positive reputation.
this is true, it does look good.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-06-2007, 12:06 AM
sir alpha sir alpha is offline
Junior User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 65
sir alpha is starting off with a positive reputation.
i think the older cars truck really did see a diff. i put one on a 83 with a big old 4bbl and it did great for mpg, i have a drop in in my 2000 150
a CAI on a 2005 focus and they didnt do much if anything for mpg on either one with injectors but they do still give better response/ cheaper in the long run for never throwing them away and everything but mpg since the computer now runs the show it will adjust for any change so if u get a flash programer it will help by seting the the computer to do what u want and not adjust eveything out of ur control but the program is something u can go too far with and blow everything up or melt things too so with that said

i would buy another K&N for anything i drive and turn the programing over to a pro

i think anymore mpg is a side affect of a little more power and torque if u stay out of it
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-07-2007, 03:24 PM
lostin90s lostin90s is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Central PA
Posts: 3,978
lostin90s is starting off with a positive reputation.
I did the put small mark of Vaseline on air tube drove out dirt drive 2 miles in the dust and came back . With K&n there was dirt on gob .Then Cleaned up made 2 trips with stock filter and drove for 2 trips mark was clean . Is the K&N better at filtration . Not according to my test . And on a 90 deg day with the dirt flying to point of laying on hood whats a better test. If you are on road get one they K&N is way to go. Good luck I run one on mine in the damp season.
__________________
Red Neck rule #1 If you drive a truck you should always be looking for trucks to get parts off of. If you can't find part used you aren't looking hard enough.

94 F150 XLT 4x4 SC LB MAF 302 E4od 3:55 ls rear
MSD blaster coil ,cap rotor ,Fordracing 9mm wires
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-07-2007, 06:20 PM
San Antonio 78 San Antonio 78 is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 23
San Antonio 78 is starting off with a positive reputation.
I had one on my grand cherokee, It gained about 1mpg and more top end power. I don't think the filtration is all that great so I will not be putting one on my powerstroke. I think the AEM and other dry filters are the way to go.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-07-2007, 10:11 PM
rsylvstr rsylvstr is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Central NY
Posts: 2,723
rsylvstr has a very good reputation on FTE.rsylvstr has a very good reputation on FTE.rsylvstr has a very good reputation on FTE.rsylvstr has a very good reputation on FTE.
and if you are really worried, you can get a universal cone filter to replace the K&N from Amsoil.
__________________
Master Chief, HMCM(FMF/AW)
JOIN US http://www.nyfirearms.com/forums/ind...eferrerid=1780
The best battlefield medicine is fire superiority
2001 SCrew Lariat 4x4 5.4L 4R70W 3.55 's LS
Conti eco tires, K&N Series 77 CAI
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-16-2007, 10:44 PM
CaptGuz's Avatar
CaptGuz CaptGuz is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Cary/Rocky Mount NC
Posts: 769
CaptGuz is starting off with a positive reputation.
i've had them on some cars and my assumption is... if they really did all that, then by now the manufacturers would replicate it and use it in your new vehicle. as for older carb'd engines - they probably are great... me personally i'll stick with the regular dry filters.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 05-16-2007, 10:48 PM
pfogle's Avatar
pfogle pfogle is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Oak Harbor, OH
Posts: 8,122
pfogle has a good reputation on FTE.pfogle has a good reputation on FTE.pfogle has a good reputation on FTE.
patfogle DaPocky
Cars USED to have oiled air cleaners a very long time ago. There's a reason they got away from it. They're sloppy, and don't filter well.
__________________
1996 F150 Regular cab, SWB, 4.9. 5speed.
- Curiosity is the root of learning. Be curious, and in turn share what you know with the curious.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-17-2007, 12:58 AM
christcorp's Avatar
christcorp christcorp is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Cheyenne, Wyoming
Posts: 194
christcorp is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
You are correct that oiled filters are sloppy. I've had some cars that I've worked on that my father in law collected from the 20's and 30's. Yes they are sloppy. But it isn't true that they don't filter well. Actually, I believe they filter better than most traditional paper type filters. The problem with them is that they require a lot of user intervention to make sure they stay clean. Most people don't want to get that involved. I can't even get my wife to check the oil.

As far as the other assumption that if they worked so well that manufacturers would have installed them on the cars from the factory. Why in the world would you believe that an auto manufacturer would a) Spend 1 penny more on a vehicle than they have to. and B) Want to make a vehicle run better or last longer. The truth is, when a customer has a car that performs exceptionally out of the ordinary or gets extremely good gas mileage, the customer tends to keep that car. Even if it's to pass down to their teenager or as a spare care. The average person with the average car will buy a new one or trade vehicles every 4-5 years. Do you honestly think the manufacturer wants you to keep a car for 7+ years.

Do not trust the automotive industry or the energy industry. This is not a conspiracy belief, this is pure truth in economics. Hell, that's one reason you don't see the auto manufacturer or the oil companies really fighting the ethanol production in the country. It isn't because they care about the consumer and the environment. It's because gasoline with ethanol get worse gas mileage that straight gasoline. The oil companies wind up selling the same amount of gasoline, so they are happy. The politicians pretend that they are making laws with ethanol that is helping the planet, so they are happy. Ethanol in a combution engine is not as good for that engine as straight gas is. Mainly because ALL alcohol bases attract water molecules. Ethanol and water will separate from the gasoline. This separation can cause the water to actually cause problems in the motor. This became very evident with boat motors that naturally are exposed to a lot of water. Gas with ethanol really screwed them up. Car manufacturers definitely like that. Do you think they will mind if you need to buy a new car sooner. Plus, many independent groups have discovered that ethanol hasn't reduced our dependency on foreign oil and has actually made the environment worse. Do not believe the car manufactures are there to look out for you. Here is some good reading.

http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig7/bothwell1.html
http://www.dailytech.com/article.asp...hold=1&red=619
__________________
The Ford Family:
2000 Ford Focus - 143,000 miles
1994 Ford Explorer (4.0l V6) - 114.000 miles
1994 Ford F250 (460 V8) - 65,100 miles
1966 Ford Mustang (289 V8) - 141,200 miles

"Born Wild; Raised Proud"
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-17-2007, 12:21 PM
pfogle's Avatar
pfogle pfogle is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Oak Harbor, OH
Posts: 8,122
pfogle has a good reputation on FTE.pfogle has a good reputation on FTE.pfogle has a good reputation on FTE.
patfogle DaPocky
All the ones I ever saw the filter media lasted maybe a month or two before it needed to be replaced, and even then it was a huge restriction on flow (talking about the oil bath types). We then progressed to the oiled filter (think K&N or Briggs and Stratton) they work great on a small engine where dirt getting sucked in isn't a huge deal (who really cares if a $150 lawn mower dies after five years), but I've seen a LOT of pitting and scoring on the cylinder walls of used small engines. Most of it was from dust and grit making it through the air filter. I like IDEA behind the K&N filter, but I don't see it doing as good of a job at filtering as it's paper cousin.
__________________
1996 F150 Regular cab, SWB, 4.9. 5speed.
- Curiosity is the root of learning. Be curious, and in turn share what you know with the curious.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-18-2007, 10:32 AM
jimandmandy jimandmandy is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Running Springs CA
Posts: 5,228
jimandmandy has a great reputation on FTE.jimandmandy has a great reputation on FTE.jimandmandy has a great reputation on FTE.jimandmandy has a great reputation on FTE.jimandmandy has a great reputation on FTE.
Can you even imagine an Iffy-lube type place servicing an oil bath air cleaner? I remember doing it on my old VW's at every oil change. Yes, when serviced regularly, they did work well, but seemed to be very restrictive, but on low-rpm engines, who cared?

Jim
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 05-28-2007, 03:03 AM
frty7ford's Avatar
frty7ford frty7ford is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 662
frty7ford is starting off with a positive reputation.
There is no doubt that a K&N airfilter flows better than a fram and most others. which can give you a better charge per cylinder ie more power and torque and better millage. if i was running a dirt road every day and it was loose dirt I would run an oil bath fliter. from talking to a friend who has a flow bench most aftermarket filters do not flow as well as the factory ones. running a fram on my 460 is like running with the choke stuck part closed. fresh cold air is what the engine runs on the best .
__________________
Jim, US Navy Retired
Winnemucca, Nevada
Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2007, 03:03 AM
 
 
 
Reply

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Misc. > Alternative Fuels, Hybrids & Mileage

Tags
additive, aftermarket, extra, filter, filters, fuel, intake, intakes, kn, mileage, money, review, unbiased, work, worth, zmax

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
TPS bad sensor symptons? rowekmr 1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel 1 03-25-2013 04:56 AM
CAI Question... Are they worth it? Ford-Maniac Air Intakes, Air Filters & Ram Air 17 07-10-2012 05:20 AM
v10 cold air intake littlejohn6977 Excursion - King of SUVs 2 02-07-2009 10:45 PM
K & N filter Blue Blooded 2004 - 2008 F150 36 08-20-2004 05:05 AM
K&N air filter worth the $ ? brents 335 Series- 5.8/351M, 6.6/400, 351 Cleveland 4 04-25-2001 12:17 PM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:04 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 AC1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Statement - Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. FordŽ is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.

vbulletin Admin Backup