Ford Truck Enthusiasts, The Internet's Leading Ford Trucks Resource, F150
 
  

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Newer Light Duty Trucks > Expedition & Navigator
Register - Join us, its Free! FAQ Members List Timeslips Calendar Mark Forums Read

Expedition & Navigator 1997 - 2002 and 2003 - 2006 models





Is F-150 Still King?


 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 03-27-2007, 09:51 PM
New User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 21
davebar is starting off with a positive reputation.
I am getting 12.8 AVG mile per gal, is the right for a 2000 5.4 motor?

I just purchased a 2000 EB expedition and I am getting 12.9 AVG MPG accoring to the computer read out. The truck has 2 mixed matched Good Year Wranglers on it and a 111,000 miles. I am going to get new tires soon, but I was wondering if the tires will help much in the MPG issue. Also, is my MPG common? I drive mostly on 35 to 55 roads w/o much stop and go. I drive like an old lay and rarely have my foot into the gas.

Any advice would be great...

Dave
   
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
To remove this ad, register today!

  #2 (permalink)  
Old 03-27-2007, 10:54 PM
Elder User
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Woodland Hills
Posts: 721
amm888 is starting off with a positive reputation.
do a search and you'll find a ton on mpg.

i've got your truck (mines 2wd, you didn't state yours) and i've been getting about 11mpg lately. but i drive nearly 100% city driving and my trips are usually less than 5 miles, and so the truck is just getting warmed up.

if i drove 35-55 like a grandma and no stop and go i think i'd probably be getting more like 14-16.

tire/inflation
winter blend gas
tune-ups

...

there can be lots of factors. again, do a search with "mpg" and you'll have enough reading for days.

good luck,
al
__________________
00 Expy EB
5.4L 2x4
50K
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 03-27-2007, 11:58 PM
Freshman User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 30
emf22 is starting off with a positive reputation.
You might try cleaning your MAF (mass air flow) sensor and running some seafoam. I did that along with changing my thermostat (was stuck open and engine wasn't getting up to temp) and resetting the PCM and got a 1.5 mpg increase from my first tank of gas on a 30/70 mix of city/highway. We'll see if it stays that way. Just note that the wires in the MAF are delicate so you should only use either a MAF specific aerosol cleaner or electric contact aerosol cleaner (which i ended up using) if you can't find the MAF cleaner. Either way, the cleaner should leave no residue of any type; sure way to screw it up. There are other ways to get more mileage out of it, i.e. tuner on 93 octance tune or e-fans, but it all depends on how much your willing to pay. I'm going to give royal purple oil a try next time the oil needs to be changed. I'm sure other people will chime in on what has helped them.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 03-28-2007, 12:50 AM
bridge's Avatar
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: League City, TX
Posts: 1,168
bridge is starting off with a positive reputation.
That's as good as it gets. You might be able to squeeze another 1mpg out of her with some new plugs and some seafoam treatment, but that's wishful thinking. My '01 averaged around 12 -13 when new.
__________________
2006 F-150 Lariat SuperCrew 5.4L 4x4
Dark Toreador Red
Edge Programmer
Westin Ultimate Bull Bar
AVIC-Z3
Magnaflow Dual Exhaust
Volant CAI
Remote Start/Alarm
Undercover Tonneau

Other Fords:
2006 EB Expedition 5.4L
2001 Eddie Bauer Expedition 5.4L
2002 Mustang Convertible GT 4.6L

Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 03-28-2007, 04:03 AM
Senior User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Tucson
Posts: 332
Luzer27 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Put an egg on the gas pedal and your wifes favorite shirt under it and you might get one or two more but... yep thats about as good as it gets. 6000+ pounds and that Newton guy don't get along to well.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 03-28-2007, 08:15 AM
Johnny Langton's Avatar
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,351
Johnny Langton is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
It's all about efficiency. The 2V 5.4L is just terribly inefficient due to the fast burn high swirl combustion chamber. Ford had to use a terribly restrictive intake manifold to build low-end torque for truck use,and this makes the engine spark advance sensitive. Add that to the fast burn chamber,and you've got a situation where you can't get away with running much ignition timing without spark knock. This makes the engine inefficient compared to some others out there,and there's not much you can do about it.
The 4V 5.4L used in the Navigator and Blackwood are much more efficent-the combustion chamber is a slower burn design and the intake manifold is much less restrictive.Ford can do this because the 4V cylinder head does a good job of filling the cylinder at low RPM to build torque without having to manipulate the intake to enhance cylinder fill. My Navigator gets 16.5-17.0 in everyday mixed driving,and on road trips-it's right at 20 mpg.
It's all about efficiency and the ability to feed the engine enough spark advance to keep from downshifting and going into open loop power enrichment. There are other things that can be done to help a 2V, but there are limits to what you can do.
JL
__________________
1997 Thunderbird LX 4.6L/4R70W
12.16@111.78

1998 F150 Supercab 4.6L/4R70W-Gone,sold to Dad.

2005 F250 Crewcab
3V V10/Torqshift 4.10LS

2001 Navigator


WANTED: OEM cat-back Exhaust from 2005-2007 5.4L or 6.8L Superduty


Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 03-28-2007, 10:17 AM
johnpvb's Avatar
Senior User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ponte Vedra Beach, FL
Posts: 102
johnpvb is starting off with a positive reputation.
I get 12-14 MPG depending on the mix of stop-and-go vs. highway. Has been pretty consistent since new. I change the oil every 3k and just put in a K&N air filter but haven't seen much impact on fuel economy. The truck does seem a little peppier. Don't think tires will make a big difference, just keep them inflated properly (although oversize tires will definitely reduce economy.)
__________________

1997 Exp EB 4x4 LLS 5.4L (only 103k miles! )
[Stock all the way except for a K&N filter]
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 03-28-2007, 10:33 AM
New User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 21
davebar is starting off with a positive reputation.
Thanks

Guys,

Thanks for the cold, hard facts.....I figured this was the deal, but was really wishful thinking. So, it really comes down to maintaining the car to keep me at the 12-13 range. I am doing a OH to FL trip in a week, so I will see how the High way driving is.

Thanks for all the tips...

DAve

Oh, Sears told me I could improve 1 to 2 MPG if I do their fuel system cleaning. Sounds like a pipe dream, but any truth to it?
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 03-28-2007, 10:33 AM
Johnny Langton's Avatar
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,351
Johnny Langton is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnpvb
I get 12-14 MPG depending on the mix of stop-and-go vs. highway. Has been pretty consistent since new. I change the oil every 3k and just put in a K&N air filter but haven't seen much impact on fuel economy. The truck does seem a little peppier. Don't think tires will make a big difference, just keep them inflated properly (although oversize tires will definitely reduce economy.)
Oversized tires (within reason) do not effect economy.Most people just change tires,and never compensate for the larger diameter in the speedometer calibration,so the odometer doesn't show the actual true mileage,and the vehicle appears to use more fuel.
Now,if you go to a 200+ lb off-road tire/wheel assembly with alot of drag compared to a street tire,then yes,the rotating mass will effect economy. But,the typical upsize to fill the wheelwells won't do it.
JL
__________________
1997 Thunderbird LX 4.6L/4R70W
12.16@111.78

1998 F150 Supercab 4.6L/4R70W-Gone,sold to Dad.

2005 F250 Crewcab
3V V10/Torqshift 4.10LS

2001 Navigator


WANTED: OEM cat-back Exhaust from 2005-2007 5.4L or 6.8L Superduty


Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 03-28-2007, 10:34 AM
Johnny Langton's Avatar
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,351
Johnny Langton is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by davebar

Oh, Sears told me I could improve 1 to 2 MPG if I do their fuel system cleaning. Sounds like a pipe dream, but any truth to it?
You're correct in that it's a useless service. It's designed to drain your wallet.
JL
__________________
1997 Thunderbird LX 4.6L/4R70W
12.16@111.78

1998 F150 Supercab 4.6L/4R70W-Gone,sold to Dad.

2005 F250 Crewcab
3V V10/Torqshift 4.10LS

2001 Navigator


WANTED: OEM cat-back Exhaust from 2005-2007 5.4L or 6.8L Superduty


Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 03-28-2007, 11:11 AM
SMIGGS's Avatar
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,161
SMIGGS has a very good reputation on FTE.SMIGGS has a very good reputation on FTE.SMIGGS has a very good reputation on FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by davebar
Guys,

Thanks for the cold, hard facts.....I figured this was the deal, but was really wishful thinking. So, it really comes down to maintaining the car to keep me at the 12-13 range. I am doing a OH to FL trip in a week, so I will see how the High way driving is.

Thanks for all the tips...

DAve

Oh, Sears told me I could improve 1 to 2 MPG if I do their fuel system cleaning. Sounds like a pipe dream, but any truth to it?
Unless I have an exception to the rule but I get around 13-14 around town. Not city, smaller community, and average anywhere from 14-16 on the highway in the cold Canadian winter and 16-18 in summer. I have a K&N and keep my speed at 65-70 mph. I have the overhead mpg guage and have checked it against my calculations and it's pretty close so I take it as gospal. I've seen as high as 22 mpg on the highway with a good tail wind.

I find if I don't reset the overhead mpg gauge it doesn't really move much if I do some town driving and then highway driving so I reset it before every extended highway trip. Also maybe try disconnecting the battery to reset the computer if you haven't done this already because the computer will calibrate settings based on driving. eg. if the previous owner had a lead foot. ( someone please correct me if I'm wrong )

Just some suggestions. Good luck!
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by BLK94F150 View Post
It's an internet forum, get used to it. It's like having a drunk conversation with every single person in the bar minus the "I love you man".

Last edited by SMIGGS : 03-28-2007 at 11:16 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 03-28-2007, 11:13 AM
buzzard's Avatar
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: All over Texas
Posts: 3,921
buzzard is starting off with a positive reputation.
I got a couple extra mpg's after changing my plugs a couple months ago, but I was only getting 10.5 to start with.
__________________
Jim

1968 F250 CS, 390
Pebble Beige/Wimbledon White

2000 4x4 Expedition, 5.4L
White
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 03-28-2007, 11:35 AM
Freshman User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 28
robbizkit is starting off with a positive reputation.
Cool

I have tried everything possible for the last 12 months and my 2000 5.4 gets 11.9 to 12.5 depending on outside temp, maybe defroster? I went up to 285/70/17 tires that are somewhat aggressive for an all terrain and noticed no difference in mpg. Best mpg on highway trip has been 15 ish. I just decided this is what it costs to drive the expi, I cant seem to ease any more out of it no matter how I modify my driving style....
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 03-28-2007, 12:45 PM
Johnny Langton's Avatar
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,351
Johnny Langton is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by robbizkit
I have tried everything possible for the last 12 months and my 2000 5.4 gets 11.9 to 12.5 depending on outside temp, maybe defroster? I went up to 285/70/17 tires that are somewhat aggressive for an all terrain and noticed no difference in mpg. Best mpg on highway trip has been 15 ish. I just decided this is what it costs to drive the expi, I cant seem to ease any more out of it no matter how I modify my driving style....
Well,unless you've made the necessary changes to the EEC,it has no idea that you're running a tire that's 10% larger than OEM. This will throw off you odometer by 10% as well,thus yeliding a lower fuel mileage figure.
JL
__________________
1997 Thunderbird LX 4.6L/4R70W
12.16@111.78

1998 F150 Supercab 4.6L/4R70W-Gone,sold to Dad.

2005 F250 Crewcab
3V V10/Torqshift 4.10LS

2001 Navigator


WANTED: OEM cat-back Exhaust from 2005-2007 5.4L or 6.8L Superduty


Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 03-28-2007, 04:08 PM
New User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: MA
Posts: 23
kitebuz is starting off with a positive reputation.
JohnnyLangton - how much of your fuel economy (relative term) do you attritbute to you tuner? 15-20mpg is pretty darn good for these vehicles - basically what GMC is currently using to market the new flex fuel yukons etc.

Any other tricks of the trade which has you getting that mileage. I was just reading published specs on the '01 Nav which posted 12/17 as their fuel #'s.

I'm considering looking into a '99 Nav vs Expedition just b/c I like what I am hearing about the 4V 5.4.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:00 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 1997-2008 Internet Brands, Inc.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - Jobs

Ford-Trucks.com and Internet Brands, Inc. are not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company.