Have you registered for your free membership? If not, click here now to register!
 

  
Join Our Site - Its free, quick and easy!
Click Here to join.   Click Here for more information
Users Chatting None

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Diesel > 6.7L Ford Diesel
Register - Join us, its Free! FAQ Members List Timeslips Calendar Mark Forums Read

6.7L Ford Diesel Discuss the upcoming 6.7L diesel engine





Is F-150 Still King?


 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 03-27-2007, 12:52 PM
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,293
PowerStrokeHD has a good reputation on FTE.PowerStrokeHD has a good reputation on FTE.PowerStrokeHD has a good reputation on FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by biz4two
Yes in the May 2007 issue of FourWheeler it does talk about "IN" house diesels from FORD.

2010
Both the 6.7L V8
and
the 4.4L V6
The 4.4L is a V8 not a V6, and should be in the F-150 for 2009. It could be possible that it also ends up in the Super Duty for 2010 as a entry level diesel.
__________________
'04 F-250 Harley-Davidson 6.0L CC SB
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 03-27-2007, 01:02 PM
kw5413's Avatar
Signed, sealed, delivered
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Great State of Texas
Posts: 9,018
kw5413 has much to be proud ofkw5413 has much to be proud ofkw5413 has much to be proud ofkw5413 has much to be proud ofkw5413 has much to be proud ofkw5413 has much to be proud ofkw5413 has much to be proud ofkw5413 has much to be proud ofkw5413 has much to be proud ofkw5413 has much to be proud of
0.00035 %...actually.
__________________
"Life is tough, but it's tougher when you're stupid."
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 03-27-2007, 01:19 PM
a-rod's Avatar
Elder User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 992
a-rod is starting off with a positive reputation.
So wasnt this 6.4 tested all summer long last year????? "Timholt" says to wait till it gets hot out?...please.... These trucks were spotted down south all last summer, im not so sure heats gonna be a problem for them.
__________________
Adam - - Collision/Refinishing Tech

2002 7.3 POWERSTROKE
95,000 miles
Straight Pipe, 6637, HPX line, pryo gauge, Foil Delete, 6.0 Intercooler + trans cooler. Superchips Tuner.
F-350 Rear Blocks, 3-1/2" front end lift

Last edited by a-rod : 03-27-2007 at 01:38 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 03-27-2007, 01:19 PM
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Florence,SC
Posts: 2,587
BowTieHatr has a good reputation on FTE.BowTieHatr has a good reputation on FTE.BowTieHatr has a good reputation on FTE.
ignorance is bliss arod.
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 03-27-2007, 02:16 PM
biz4two's Avatar
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Albuquerque
Posts: 3,896
biz4two has a good reputation on FTE.biz4two has a good reputation on FTE.
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by PowerStrokeHD
The 4.4L is a V8 not a V6, and should be in the F-150 for 2009. It could be possible that it also ends up in the Super Duty for 2010 as a entry level diesel.
Do you have a copy of FourWheeler May 2007 edition, page 16?

If not, then you might go out and buy one...so you can see for yourself. According to the mag... the 4.4L is a V6.


biz
__________________

2003 F250 SD SC 142" XLT FX4 V10 Auto 4x4 3.73s
1976 F150 LWB Custom 4x4 390FE NP435 3.50s
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 03-27-2007, 02:22 PM
biz4two's Avatar
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Albuquerque
Posts: 3,896
biz4two has a good reputation on FTE.biz4two has a good reputation on FTE.
Arrow

Quote:
Originally Posted by a-rod
So wasnt this 6.4 tested all summer long last year????? "Timholt" says to wait till it gets hot out?...please.... These trucks were spotted down south all last summer, im not so sure heats gonna be a problem for them.
I agree...the heat shouldn't be a big deal as it was with the 6.0L PSD. Afterall, the 6.4L PSD has WAY more cooling capacity...with a larger radiator and a water pump that doubles the 6.0L flow rate.

IMO...it is unfortunate that the 6.4L is going to be a short production run. But if FORD and NAV cannot play well together, then it's best that FORD take the soon to be new 6.7L and design it in house.


biz
__________________

2003 F250 SD SC 142" XLT FX4 V10 Auto 4x4 3.73s
1976 F150 LWB Custom 4x4 390FE NP435 3.50s
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 03-27-2007, 03:58 PM
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Capac MI
Posts: 1,328
THE KING is starting off with a positive reputation.
ITS A NEW ENGINE! Let them figure it out. If you have to point fingers look at the 5.4 when they first came out! My dad bought one and it didnt even have 1000 miles on it and it blew up. Ford was on that problem fast and put in new motor that was better. All i gotta say is if ford screws this up, i dont know what will happen. They need this motor to take off and do good. And with the thing about ford making an in house motor. If i remember right ford came up with the fuel injector system on the 6.0? That didnt work out to well. I might be wrong but i thought i read that once.
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 03-27-2007, 03:59 PM
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,353
origcharger is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
One guy says they didn't test them hot, one guy says they didn't test them cold.
__________________
Powerstroking Seven T444Es, one VT365 and one 6.0. Also four DT466s, one DT360 and a Mercedes MBE906.


I'm doing my part to reduce food imports, control rising food costs and help feed the children, my trucks run on 100% petroleum diesel. What are you doing?
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 03-27-2007, 04:01 PM
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Capac MI
Posts: 1,328
THE KING is starting off with a positive reputation.
LOL Did they test them at all? LOL O geez. I thought i saw a couple durring the winter time so i know they tested them cold, and they tested them alot. I saw these trucks at least once a day on the highway and around down.
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 03-27-2007, 05:32 PM
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,293
PowerStrokeHD has a good reputation on FTE.PowerStrokeHD has a good reputation on FTE.PowerStrokeHD has a good reputation on FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by biz4two
Do you have a copy of FourWheeler May 2007 edition, page 16?

If not, then you might go out and buy one...so you can see for yourself. According to the mag... the 4.4L is a V6.


biz
I do not need the magazine, as I do believe that is what it says. Maybe it was a misprint. The 4.4L will be based off the 3.6L TDV8. The 3.6L TDV8 (recently released in Europe) was devloped from the old 2.7L TDV6 (no longer in production).
__________________
'04 F-250 Harley-Davidson 6.0L CC SB
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 03-27-2007, 06:20 PM
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Duluth, Mn.
Posts: 1,133
fonefiddy is starting off with a positive reputation.
I'm sure the 6.4 will be fine. There will be a few bugs, as ANY new engine platform has.
As far as an in house diesel. I can't see why Ford can't jsut bring one over from GB. Heck, they built the new plant, and supposedly it's capable of 700,000 units a year.
__________________
93 F One Fiddy- 5.0/AOD/3.55 230K OEM
93 F Two Fiddy Scab- 7.3/ZF5/4.10/Sidewinder II,94 Turbo pump,G Inj's, Velvet Ride, Turbo Bumper, Alcoa's
85 F Two Fiddy-6.9/C6/3.54/ Holley Red, Racor, Soup Bowl,AutoJet 3",Ride Rite Rear

Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 03-27-2007, 06:39 PM
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Capac MI
Posts: 1,328
THE KING is starting off with a positive reputation.
To solve all the problems. Bring out a Redesigned 7.3! Improve on some of the very few problems, and make it so it fits the emissions standards. The 7.3L is a Perfect Foundation and i know that many people would agree. Ford made the biggest mistake by changing that motor!
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 03-27-2007, 07:16 PM
a-rod's Avatar
Elder User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 992
a-rod is starting off with a positive reputation.
I agree, a redesigned 7.3 to meet emission standards, Even if its completly reworked with twin turbos, It would still sell like crazy being a 7.3.
__________________
Adam - - Collision/Refinishing Tech

2002 7.3 POWERSTROKE
95,000 miles
Straight Pipe, 6637, HPX line, pryo gauge, Foil Delete, 6.0 Intercooler + trans cooler. Superchips Tuner.
F-350 Rear Blocks, 3-1/2" front end lift
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 03-27-2007, 07:23 PM
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Capac MI
Posts: 1,328
THE KING is starting off with a positive reputation.
Yea the 7.3 Has a Great name! Good Reputation.
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old 03-27-2007, 07:24 PM
jvoigt's Avatar
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Hamilton, MT
Posts: 1,119
jvoigt is starting off with a positive reputation.
It would be nice if they could just stuff a 7.3L in a new SD.......I am sorry but I still think there would be problems.....The Eng block would be the same but thats about it, new Piezo injectors, glow plugs, cooling system, and possible twin turbos plus not to mention its gonna have a DPF and it could still be a flame thrower if they dont do it right. About the only advantage is the Displacement. I love my 7.3L but it is decades away from becomeing the new Diesel engine of the future.
__________________
'02 Dark shadow Grey F250 SC 7.3L Lariat 4X4 (Mods:Volant Intake, MBRP 4", 2.5" Leveling Kit, F-350 Blocks, Dick Cepek DC-1's, 35"x12.5"R17 Toyo MT's)
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:40 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 1997-2008 Internet Brands, Inc.
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - JOBS

Ford-Trucks.com and Internet Brands, Inc. is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company.
© 1997-2007 Internet Brands, Inc., Please see our Terms of Use / Privacy Policy