N. California Chapter Join Chapter , Leader: Nighteyez

California Legislative Alert From SEMA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 03-19-2007, 06:42 PM
FTE Ken's Avatar
FTE Ken
FTE Ken is offline
Post Fiend
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 1997
Location: Enjoying the real world.
Posts: 23,165
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
California Legislative Alert From SEMA

URGENT LEGISLATIVE ALERT

California Considers Taxing “Gas Guzzlers”

In a misguided attempt to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, legislation (A.B. 493) has been introduced in the California Assembly by Assemblyman Ira Ruskin (Assemblymember.Ruskin@assembly.ca.gov) to establish a progressive purchase surcharge for some new motor vehicles based on state calculations of carbon emissions. Depending on the vehicle purchased, this surcharge could require owners to pay up to $2,500 more for the vehicle. Funds collected under the program would be used in part to fund discounts for hybrids and electric cars. If this effort is successful, the effects on your ability to purchase the vehicle of your choice, not to mention vehicle safety, will be dramatic.

We Urge You to Contact the Assembly Transportation Committee Members (List Below) Immediately To Request Their Opposition to A.. 493

H.B 493 will limit consumer choice in purchasing vehicles by making popular performance and luxury cars, as well as SUVs, light trucks and minivans, substantially more expensive to own.


H.B. 493 will potentially lead to more deaths on California’s highways as higher taxes on larger, safer vehicles forces consumers into smaller cars with higher accident fatality rates.


H.B. 493 will not conserve energy. Greenhouse gas emissions depends on a host of other factors such as total miles traveled.


H.B. 493 will do little to improve air quality. Air quality has more to do with overall basic vehicle maintenance than it does with owning and operating any particular class of vehicle.
DON’T DELAY! Please contact members of the California Assembly Transportation Committee immediately by phone or e-mail to request their opposition to this bill.

Please e-mail a copy of your letter to stevem@sema.org. Thank you for your assistance.

Assembly Transportation Committee

Pedro Nava, Chair
Telephone: (916) 319-2035
Fax: (916) 319-2135
Email: Assemblymember.nava@assembly.ca.gov

Michael D. Duvall, Vice-Chair
Telephone: (916) 319-2072
Fax: (916) 319-2172
Email: Assemblymember.Duvall@assembly.ca.gov

Wilma Amina Carter
Telephone: (916) 319-2062
Fax: (916) 319-2162
Email: Assemblymember.Carter@assembly.ca.gov

Mike DeSaulnier
Telephone: (916) 319-2011
Fax: (916) 319-2111
Email: Assemblymember.DeSaulnier@assembly.ca.gov

Cathleen Galgiani
Tel: (916) 319-2017
Fax: (916) 319-2117
Email: Assemblymember.Galgiani@assembly.ca.gov

Martin Garrick
Telephone: (916) 319-2074
Fax: (916) 319-2174
Email: Assemblymember.Garrick@assembly.ca.gov

Shirley Horton
Telephone: (916) 319-2078
Email: Assemblymember.Shirley.Horton@assembly.ca.gov

Guy S. Houston
Telephone: (916) 319-2015
Fax: (916) 319-2115
Email: Assemblymember.Houston@assembly.ca.gov

Bob Huff
Telephone: (916) 319-2060
Fax: (916) 319-2160
Email: assemblymember.huff@assembly.ca.gov

Betty Karnette
Telephone: (916) 319-2054
Email: Assemblymember.Karnette@assembly.ca.gov

Anthony J. Portantino
Telephone: (916) 319-2044
Fax: (916) 319-2144
Email: assemblymember.Portantino@assembly.ca.gov

Ira Ruskin
Telephone: (916) 319 - 2021
Fax: (916) 319 – 2121
Email: Assemblymember.Ruskin@assembly.ca.gov

Jose Solorio
Telephone: (916) 319-2069
Fax: (916) 319-2169

Nell Soto
Telephone: (916) 319-2061
Fax: (916) 319-2161
Email: Assemblymember.Soto@assembly.ca.gov
 
  #2  
Old 03-19-2007, 07:35 PM
3Mike6's Avatar
3Mike6
3Mike6 is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Oakdale,Ca.
Posts: 4,172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I dunno...my next new car purchase will be a Hybrid....
 
  #3  
Old 03-19-2007, 08:14 PM
WillyB's Avatar
WillyB
WillyB is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Near Fresno, California
Posts: 5,231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This idea has been around for a lot of years - it seems someone brings it out whenever they want to stimulate some political donations. I don't think it will ever become law.

The idea is to take money from someone buying a gas-guzzler and to give it to someone who is buying an econ-box. I see no problem with that, except I do wonder if the state will really pass the money along, or if they would keep it for themselves.

I have often wondered why the big three manufacturers have fought gas mileage standards so hard - except that maybe it makes for better business to sell the consumer a $1200 radio than to do the basic engineering that would take a vehicle from 20 to 25 MPG. I guess there is more profit in an expensive sound system than in basic engineering.

But when the gas crunch comes, we are stuck with vehicles that get 20 to 25 MPG while the rest of the world drive vehicles that get 35 to 40 MPG - but we do it with style and while listening to premium sound!
 
  #4  
Old 03-20-2007, 07:31 AM
olfordsnstone's Avatar
olfordsnstone
olfordsnstone is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Other side of the sunrise
Posts: 5,232
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by WillyB
except I do wonder if the state will really pass the money along, or if they would keep it for themselves.
Oh, come on Clint. Don't you trust your government with your money? Just look at how well they're taking care of our social security.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Eds56Effie
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
10
01-24-2013 01:04 PM
Redneck-Cowboy
Nebraska Chapter
20
02-10-2010 08:54 PM
Col Flashman
S. California Chapter
6
04-26-2009 03:36 PM
hawkrod
General Automotive Discussion
16
02-27-2004 06:38 PM



Quick Reply: California Legislative Alert From SEMA



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:26 PM.