Have you registered for your free membership? If not, click here now to register!
 

  
Join Our Site - Its free, quick and easy!
Click Here to join.   Click Here for more information
Users Chatting None

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Newer Light Duty Trucks > The 2009 F150
Register - Join us, its Free! FAQ Members List Timeslips Calendar Mark Forums Read

The 2009 F150 Discuss the new 2009 Ford F150





Is F-150 Still King?


 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 03-25-2007, 09:00 AM
LxMan1's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Louisville,Ky.
Posts: 18,439
LxMan1 is a splendid one to beholdLxMan1 is a splendid one to beholdLxMan1 is a splendid one to beholdLxMan1 is a splendid one to beholdLxMan1 is a splendid one to beholdLxMan1 is a splendid one to beholdLxMan1 is a splendid one to behold
I think a retro like a 56 would be cool. Kinda like Chevy did with the SSR.
The stuff the engine bay with the 500hp 5.4L from a 07 Mustang GT500 Shelby Cobra. That would make a killer Lightning edition
__________________
Jimmy- FTE Moderator
Support FTE....Online Store
88 5.0 LX Mustang
63 F100 351W/C6

Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 03-25-2007, 06:21 PM
Matts72's Avatar
Moderator- High Plains
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Billings, Montana
Posts: 10,017
Matts72 has a good reputation on FTE.Matts72 has a good reputation on FTE.Matts72 has a good reputation on FTE.
I would settle for a 79 F150 2wd shortbox, 4 speed manual, PS, PB, 4 wheel disk brakes, 6.8L V10, Kenne Bell twin screw, factory exhaust cutouts at the flip of a switch. Just a thought...
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 03-25-2007, 08:15 PM
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Iowa
Posts: 8,596
rusty70f100 is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.rusty70f100 is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by luckster
That is great mileage for a 390! I have a 360/390 in one of my other trucks, maybe 13mpg hwy, city about 8 but its 4x and a heavy hauler so I don't care much about economy there. Point is todays "modern" engines may be cleaner out the exhaust but really not improved power or economy. Better oils explain longer engine life to me more than new design.
Are todays trucks that much heavier? Body metal seems thinner and more plastic is used so where is all that extra weight? They should be a bit more aerodynamic. Transmissions draining power somehow? Question is why isn't mileage or power or both improved?
Well it is a fuel injected 390. But if a then college student (me) can do the research construct something that does that good, what does that say?

Anyway, my 2wd F100 weighs about 3900lbs. It also sits lower (displaces less air moving down the road) than the current F150, which weighs about 6000lbs last I heard. Those two factors (weight and height) are not good for mileage.

I'm sure if someone took the 5.4L engine and auto transmission and put it in an old F100 like I've got, it would probably do a lot better. Might even get 17mpg!
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 03-25-2007, 11:00 PM
Matts72's Avatar
Moderator- High Plains
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Billings, Montana
Posts: 10,017
Matts72 has a good reputation on FTE.Matts72 has a good reputation on FTE.Matts72 has a good reputation on FTE.
My 68 F100 2wd with a well built carb'd 390 and toploader 3 speed/OD tranny will easily get 16.5 MPG... its not impossible at all.
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 03-27-2007, 10:19 AM
krane operator's Avatar
Senior User
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Houston, Tejas
Posts: 203
krane operator is starting off with a positive reputation.
UMm i guess we could possible say ford did do a partial throwback on the 04-07 truck with the round looking headlights.
__________________
99 5.4 x-c SD dark torredor clear mttlc
05 oem foglight kit
k-9 alarm w/headlight delay
04 heated TT Signal Mirrors
2005 grill bumper mod

2006 supercrew lariat Medium wedgeblue/arizona beige
5.4
Pwr/rear slider, audiophile ,console shift,added factory tow hooks
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 03-27-2007, 01:47 PM
Senior User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 124
torino_gt is starting off with a positive reputation.
i'll chime in for the '78-'79 years. these are the toughest trucks ever built..save maybe the 99 and up super duty's. i still have a 78 bronco and my dad has a 78 f150, my cousin has 2 78 bronco's. These things last forever...just count how many you still see on the road. they were built tough and simple, but were still years ahead of chevy at that time. heck when did chevy finally get a headliner in trucks, like '91 or something! just look at the modified motors, i know everyone hates them, they were torque monsters and run forever w/ or w/o problems.
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 03-27-2007, 03:50 PM
Elder User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Denver USA
Posts: 527
V8EXPLR is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
I'd love to see a model edition of the '78-'79 F-Series. Always loved the body style. Some of he 50's were nice, but I'm not the biggest fan of some 60's styles.
__________________
Justin


2006 Ford F-150 SuperCrew XLT Chrome Edition
5.4L Flex-Fuel, 3.73LS, 18" Stock Rims, 18" BFG Rugged Trail T/A's, Trailer Tow Pkg
Sun/Moonroof, Fog Lamps, Ford Bedliner
Lund Headlight & Taillight Covers, Lund VentVisors
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 03-28-2007, 06:28 PM
Junior User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 66
Skinsfan6 is starting off with a positive reputation.
I also think if Ford made a new F150, or F100 modeled after the 78-79s, but with a modern drivetrain and interior that they'd sell tons of em.
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 03-29-2007, 04:53 AM
Monsta's Avatar
Sit. Stay. Become a
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Big Island of Hawai'i
Posts: 14,164
Monsta has a great reputation on FTE.Monsta has a great reputation on FTE.Monsta has a great reputation on FTE.Monsta has a great reputation on FTE.Monsta has a great reputation on FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by luckster
TBody metal seems thinner and more plastic is used so where is all that extra weight?
I'd bet there's like 1000lbs worth of added electrical wires, electrical accessoies & emissions stuff compared to trucks of old.

Quote:
They should be a bit more aerodynamic. Transmissions draining power somehow? Question is why isn't mileage or power or both improved?
Mileage hasn't improved due to weight...of both truck and driver! But power has...CLEAN(er) power that is.
__________________
Ken
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
05V10


So many cats, so few recipes.
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 03-29-2007, 10:46 AM
Senior User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Enid, OK
Posts: 216
Arnold Kenyon is starting off with a positive reputation.
Bring back the 78/79 body, I would buy at least one of them.

Speaking of weight, a friend of mine works at the local ford dealership. He says that they do not put on much clearcoat because of the added weight.
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 03-29-2007, 02:10 PM
Elder User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Milpitas, CA; Tyler, TX
Posts: 541
jcp123 is starting off with a positive reputation.
No way, I wouldn'd support that one bit. When they came out with the '05 mUGLYstang, the market fell out from under the classics. And it just so happened I needed to sell then. The same thing would happen here I'm sure.

Plus, it's folly. With emissions, safety, and bumper laws, you just CANNOT get the same look or feeling that the classics had. We like them for a reason, because they aren't new. No EFI to hassle with, no emissions plumbing in your way, etc. Just evolve it from the current bodystyle, Ford, and you'll be fine.
__________________
James - Tyler, Tx.
1992 Ford Bronco EB - "The Plasticky Wonder" - R.I.P
'04 Focus SVT - Infra-Red 3-door

Real cars aren't made of plastic and computers. Unfortunately, mine is...
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 03-29-2007, 06:17 PM
DiscountPowerPrt's Avatar
FTE Sponsor
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 743
DiscountPowerPrt is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.DiscountPowerPrt is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Are there any prototype pictures of this retro rig?
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 03-31-2007, 10:51 AM
Senior User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 163
nascar6dude is starting off with a positive reputation.
Hey ya'll, how about something like this?
http://i175.photobucket.com/albums/w...002_01_big.jpg
__________________
'06 F-150 R/C 2WD, 4.6, 3.55 L/S
'01 F-150 R/C 2WD, 4.2 V-6 ( 2 )
'93 BRONCO 4X4 5.8, AUTO.
'89 F-150 2WD 5.0, AUTO.
'70 BRONCO 4X4 351W, 3sp




Last edited by nascar6dude : 03-31-2007 at 11:46 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 03-31-2007, 11:49 AM
Senior User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 163
nascar6dude is starting off with a positive reputation.
Here's a rear view...
http://i175.photobucket.com/albums/w...002_02_big.jpg
__________________
'06 F-150 R/C 2WD, 4.6, 3.55 L/S
'01 F-150 R/C 2WD, 4.2 V-6 ( 2 )
'93 BRONCO 4X4 5.8, AUTO.
'89 F-150 2WD 5.0, AUTO.
'70 BRONCO 4X4 351W, 3sp



Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old 03-31-2007, 01:36 PM
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Campbell River, B.C.
Posts: 3,023
David85 is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
I would absolutly LOVE to see the 74-79 (or 78-79 if you prefer) come back! Ofcorse it was tough, but it was also the only style of truck I ever saw, that looked right from any angle. Remember the old crewcab short box HDs that had a D60 on both ends....drool.

Now if it ends up being some re-encarnation of what ford did to the mustang (they could have done better), than I would say please leave well enough alone. But if they do to the 70s style truck what they did to the GT40.....now your talkin' !

I just hope the don't do like dodge, when the new charger came out .
__________________
1986 F250HD Ex cab Fresh built up 6.9L diesel Lariat AC leather seats power everything w/full cluster, sterling rear 3.08LS gears, E4OD trans, ram intake ATS 088 turbo


1986 F150 Ex cab Lariat rollercam 5.0L on LPG AOD trans 3.55 gears 390 000Ks
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:56 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 1997-2008 Internet Brands, Inc.
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - JOBS

Ford-Trucks.com and Internet Brands, Inc. is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company.
© 1997-2007 Internet Brands, Inc., Please see our Terms of Use / Privacy Policy