Have you registered for your free membership? If not, click here now to register!
 

  
Join Our Site - Its free, quick and easy!
Click Here to join.   Click Here for more information
Users Chatting None

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Newer Light Duty Trucks > The 2009 F150
Register - Join us, its Free! FAQ Members List Timeslips Calendar Mark Forums Read

The 2009 F150 Discuss the new 2009 Ford F150





Is F-150 Still King?


 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 03-15-2007, 12:35 PM
Senior User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: IA
Posts: 104
vochy is starting off with a positive reputation.
Why a six speed auto?

Why does everybody want to see 6 speed trannys. I'm not sure there is much of a performance gain with them. Here is a list of down falls:

-More moving parts
-Greater complexity to service
-More shifting (up and down hills)
-More shifting = more heat= more damage

Any comments good or bad, lets hear them!
   
__________________
Vochy: Bone stock '06 F-150, Black Supercab Short box, 5.4L 4x4 XLT
88' F-150 Black Short Box, 302 4x4, true dual flowmater 2in exaust, Mustang equal length headers
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
To remove this ad, register today!

  #2 (permalink)  
Old 03-15-2007, 12:54 PM
FTE Ken's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 1997
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 21,643
FTE Ken has a superb reputationFTE Ken has a superb reputationFTE Ken has a superb reputationFTE Ken has a superb reputationFTE Ken has a superb reputationFTE Ken has a superb reputationFTE Ken has a superb reputationFTE Ken has a superb reputationFTE Ken has a superb reputationFTE Ken has a superb reputationFTE Ken has a superb reputation
Better mileage and more performance because the engine stays in the optimal horsepower/torque rpm range longer.
__________________
Ken Payne
Gone Fishing...

LACK OF PLANNING ON YOUR PART DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN EMERGENCY ON MY PART.

2006 Roush F150 Project: Roush Supercharger, Troyer & My Tuning, 9lb pulley, Level 10 Trans, E-Fans, Oil Separator, Brandmotion GPS, BlueConnect Hands-Free Phone & iPod Direct Connect, Black Headlights & Taillights, Retrax Retractable Tonneau & more.
2004 F250 King Ranch Crewcab 4x4 6.0L PSD project: DP-Tuner Tuning and MBRP Stainless Dual Exhaust.
2000 Ranger Supercab XLT 3.0 V6 project: Bright Box, Mac Intake, Tonneau, my tuning.
RIP: 1967 & 1975 F100, looking for a 66 F100

Last edited by FTE Ken : 03-15-2007 at 02:09 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 03-15-2007, 01:32 PM
Senior User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 371
snowdog79 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Vochy, don't forget, more $$ too!
__________________
Current Ford Trucks
00 Ranger SC 4x4/4.0/a
07 F150 Screw 4x4/5.4
Previous
69 F600 300/5+2
77 F250 4x2/351M/C6
78 F150 SC 4x2/300/3M
79 F150 4x4/400/T18
85 Bronco II XLT 4x4/2.8/a
89 F150 4x4/300/4M
93 EB Bronco 5.0
00 F150 7700 SC 4x4/5.4
01 F350 CC 4x4 DRW PSD
03 Explorer 4.6/AWD/LS
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 03-15-2007, 01:49 PM
Junior User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 67
laketrout is starting off with a positive reputation.
2 overdrives = better mileage

closer gear spacing, allowing engine to stay in sweet spot even after shifting, as opposed to having a big rpm drop and lugging (especially when towing).

Using the Toyota 6sp as an example, 1st is lower than our 4sp, allowing better off line acceleration/power, gears are more closely spaced, and there are 2 overdrives, allowing a lower rear-end gear without sacrificing mileage.
__________________
2002 F150 Supercrew FX4 5.4
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 03-15-2007, 06:17 PM
Senior User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 284
ohboy44 is starting off with a positive reputation.
I've had the opportunity to both drive and be a passenger in a Navigator with a 6 speed trans and I like it. It might take a little getting use to it. I didn't notice any issues with it down shifting and up shifting while stuck in traffic going between 30 and 60 mph.
With the extra gears normal take off is much better and the engine doesn't lug like my current 06 F-150.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 03-15-2007, 06:26 PM
Monsta's Avatar
Sit. Stay. Become a
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Big Island of Hawai'i
Posts: 14,164
Monsta has a great reputation on FTE.Monsta has a great reputation on FTE.Monsta has a great reputation on FTE.Monsta has a great reputation on FTE.Monsta has a great reputation on FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by vochy
Any comments good or bad, lets hear them!
Because four speeds are like, so totally 80's already.
__________________
Ken
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
05V10


So many cats, so few recipes.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 03-16-2007, 09:38 AM
Senior User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: IA
Posts: 104
vochy is starting off with a positive reputation.
IMO more moving parts are bad. maybe i'm just stuck in the past? It just seems like transmissions are following the path of razor blades. 3 blades work for me. I tried the more expensive 4 and 5 blade razors but found any increased performance from them wasn't worth the cost.

In my 06' 5.4l, I found that the Torque converter lock up at a high enough RPM to get into the torque curve and has very strong off the line pick-up. gearing up any more would be a waste. IMO!
__________________
Vochy: Bone stock '06 F-150, Black Supercab Short box, 5.4L 4x4 XLT
88' F-150 Black Short Box, 302 4x4, true dual flowmater 2in exaust, Mustang equal length headers
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 03-16-2007, 09:57 AM
Senior User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 134
TOMHONE is starting off with a positive reputation.
I tried the more expensive 4 and 5 blade razors but found any increased performance from them wasn't worth the cost. You got that right. Try buying those replacement blades yet? What a rip off. As for the new 6-speed at what speed would the 6th gear kick in at? In my Ford the 4th gear is around 40 mph.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 03-16-2007, 11:08 AM
Freshman User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 46
fla.boy is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by vochy
Why does everybody want to see 6 speed trannys. I'm not sure there is much of a performance gain with them. Here is a list of down falls:

-More moving parts
-Greater complexity to service
-More shifting (up and down hills)
-More shifting = more heat= more damage

Any comments good or bad, lets hear them!
hey vochy! test drive a new expedition and you will understand the 6 speed!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 03-16-2007, 12:18 PM
FTE Ken's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 1997
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 21,643
FTE Ken has a superb reputationFTE Ken has a superb reputationFTE Ken has a superb reputationFTE Ken has a superb reputationFTE Ken has a superb reputationFTE Ken has a superb reputationFTE Ken has a superb reputationFTE Ken has a superb reputationFTE Ken has a superb reputationFTE Ken has a superb reputationFTE Ken has a superb reputation
Arguing against more gears doesn't acknowledge the realities auto makers face with getting their fleet mileage numbers higher. The number of gears in the case of a automatic transmission does not impact its lifespan. Today's 4 and 5 speeds have longer life than than the 3 speeds of 20 years ago.
__________________
Ken Payne
Gone Fishing...

LACK OF PLANNING ON YOUR PART DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN EMERGENCY ON MY PART.

2006 Roush F150 Project: Roush Supercharger, Troyer & My Tuning, 9lb pulley, Level 10 Trans, E-Fans, Oil Separator, Brandmotion GPS, BlueConnect Hands-Free Phone & iPod Direct Connect, Black Headlights & Taillights, Retrax Retractable Tonneau & more.
2004 F250 King Ranch Crewcab 4x4 6.0L PSD project: DP-Tuner Tuning and MBRP Stainless Dual Exhaust.
2000 Ranger Supercab XLT 3.0 V6 project: Bright Box, Mac Intake, Tonneau, my tuning.
RIP: 1967 & 1975 F100, looking for a 66 F100
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 03-16-2007, 01:23 PM
captain p4's Avatar
I'll sleep when I'm dead
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Joppa, Maryland
Posts: 4,060
captain p4 is a splendid one to beholdcaptain p4 is a splendid one to beholdcaptain p4 is a splendid one to beholdcaptain p4 is a splendid one to beholdcaptain p4 is a splendid one to beholdcaptain p4 is a splendid one to beholdcaptain p4 is a splendid one to behold
how bout you spend less time using each gear so it'll last longer?

Better performance and mileage are enough to justify a small price increase (if there even is one) and its been proven to work in the expy, so there isn't going to be any reliablity issues. I don't see a problem.
__________________
-Paul



78 Bronco 400 c6 np205 d60/sterling10.25
OBA, 36" hummer tires, some other stuff

2003 F350 Supercab shortbed FX4 6.0 PSD
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 03-16-2007, 03:33 PM
Senior User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: IA
Posts: 104
vochy is starting off with a positive reputation.
"how bout you spend less time using each gear so it'll last longer?"
-captin

I was under the impression that shifting does more damage to wear components like clutch packs, than spending time in a gear.

"Today's 4 and 5 speeds have longer life than than the 3 speeds of 20 years ago."
-webmaster

Thats because todays technology allows for the manufacture of better components. 4 speeds of today will likely out last 4 speeds of 20 years ago. Or maybe they won't.

"2 overdrives = better mileage"
-laketrout

I dissagree, my girl friend drives a 96' contor which only has a 3 speed tranny in it. for a car of its size it gets very good fuel economy (30 mph). and as for the six speeds keeping the RPM's in the sweet spot I beleive (correct me if im wrong) the the 4 speed in my 06' has clutching action between gears to keep the RPM's in a sweet spot.

People is all a marketing ploy, if your tranny has 6 speeds they can charge you several thousand more dollars up front for the truck. Then they can charge you more money for speical tools and filters and oils to service it. Then they can charge you more money to rebuild it because there will be 50% more parts. and don't forget it will be more complicated for do-it-your-selfers.
Don't get mad at me its just my opionion and I would love to hear more of yours!
__________________
Vochy: Bone stock '06 F-150, Black Supercab Short box, 5.4L 4x4 XLT
88' F-150 Black Short Box, 302 4x4, true dual flowmater 2in exaust, Mustang equal length headers
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 03-16-2007, 04:15 PM
FTE Ken's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 1997
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 21,643
FTE Ken has a superb reputationFTE Ken has a superb reputationFTE Ken has a superb reputationFTE Ken has a superb reputationFTE Ken has a superb reputationFTE Ken has a superb reputationFTE Ken has a superb reputationFTE Ken has a superb reputationFTE Ken has a superb reputationFTE Ken has a superb reputationFTE Ken has a superb reputation
The the lower RPM spread between gears results in less wear on the clutch packs even though there are more gears. Additionally there is a mileage increase, despite your experience with one 10 year old 3 speed car. Did you try out a 6 speed in that car as well to compare the results? No.

The pure and simple fact is it does give more mileage. Thats the entire reason behind to push to either add more gears or come up with economical infinite ratio transmissions (which constantly keep the engine in the RPM sweet spot regardless of speed).

Lastly, your implication that a 6 speed is several thousand dollars more, is, well, as nicely as I can say it: far-fetched.

Automakers don't want to raise vehicle complexity and prices, it makes them much harder to sell. They won't implement higher priced technology unless there is a valid reason for it.

Vochy, I don't understand why you asked the question if you had your mind made up in advance and you're just gonna disagree with all the answers given.
__________________
Ken Payne
Gone Fishing...

LACK OF PLANNING ON YOUR PART DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN EMERGENCY ON MY PART.

2006 Roush F150 Project: Roush Supercharger, Troyer & My Tuning, 9lb pulley, Level 10 Trans, E-Fans, Oil Separator, Brandmotion GPS, BlueConnect Hands-Free Phone & iPod Direct Connect, Black Headlights & Taillights, Retrax Retractable Tonneau & more.
2004 F250 King Ranch Crewcab 4x4 6.0L PSD project: DP-Tuner Tuning and MBRP Stainless Dual Exhaust.
2000 Ranger Supercab XLT 3.0 V6 project: Bright Box, Mac Intake, Tonneau, my tuning.
RIP: 1967 & 1975 F100, looking for a 66 F100

Last edited by FTE Ken : 03-16-2007 at 04:18 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 03-16-2007, 06:11 PM
gui88ford's Avatar
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Maple Grove, PA
Posts: 1,427
gui88ford is starting off with a positive reputation.
i agree with webmaster...if you want to beotch about the 6 speed when we don't even have the option to have on yet....i'd hate to see what you'll say when you actually have one....if they all suck so bad go get a powerglide and fit that to your truck......if your logic is correct thats the best you'll ever find....
__________________
Pennsylvania Chapter: Enjoying our little part of the world
2007 F150 XLT super cab, chrome package, 18" Chrome Clad Wheels, 5" Step Bar, 3.73 LS, 5.4 FFV 4x4
2002 Harley Davidson V-Rod --to many mods--
2006 Polaris 700CC Sportsman --to many mods--
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 03-16-2007, 07:01 PM
LxMan1's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Louisville,Ky.
Posts: 18,439
LxMan1 is a splendid one to beholdLxMan1 is a splendid one to beholdLxMan1 is a splendid one to beholdLxMan1 is a splendid one to beholdLxMan1 is a splendid one to beholdLxMan1 is a splendid one to beholdLxMan1 is a splendid one to behold
I know the 5-speed auto in the new GT Mustangs is much better than the old AOD.
__________________
Jimmy- FTE Moderator
Support FTE....Online Store
88 5.0 LX Mustang
63 F100 351W/C6

Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:45 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 1997-2008 Internet Brands, Inc.
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - JOBS

Ford-Trucks.com and Internet Brands, Inc. is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company.
© 1997-2007 Internet Brands, Inc., Please see our Terms of Use / Privacy Policy