Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Performance, Engines & Troubleshooting > Modular V10 (6.8l)
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?


Modular V10 (6.8l) SPONSORED BY:

Welcome to Ford-Trucks Forums!
Welcome to Ford-Trucks.com.

You are currently viewing our forums as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Ford-Trucks Forums community today!





 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-28-2007, 08:25 PM
truckfella's Avatar
truckfella truckfella is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 394
truckfella is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Cylinder deactivation?

I'm just wondering if anyone here knows whether or not Ford has done any work or has explored the possibility of incorporating cylinder deactivation into the V-10.

By the way, I fully agree that anyone who drives a vehicle with a large engine - either gas or diesel - and doesn't expect to get less than stellar mileage is being unreasonable. However, I also don't think there's anything wrong with wanting to/trying to increase a vehicle's mileage if there so exists a way.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 02-28-2007, 08:43 PM
NoMo's Avatar
NoMo NoMo is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: OK
Posts: 4,742
NoMo is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Haven't heard anything from Ford on that angle but there have been a few people here (like yourself) bring up the idea.

Personally, the technology isn't as great as some would have you believe. Our GM has it and it's in V4 mode so little that it can't possibly provide more than 1MPG- and I really doubt it's that much. Given the cost of the technology to implement deactivation, it just doesn't seem worth it to me.
__________________
2012 Ford Fusion SE I4
2011 F150 XLT CC 4x4 w/3.5L V6
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 02-28-2007, 10:48 PM
Ricohman's Avatar
Ricohman Ricohman is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 880
Ricohman is starting off with a positive reputation.
I had the glorious opportunity to be a GM tech when the Cadillac V8-6-4 engines were starting to show their age.
Needless to say I am forever biased against cylinder deactivation.
That and 4 cyl Fiero's....
__________________
2010 F350 4x4 6.8 XLT XTR CC
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 03-01-2007, 07:59 AM
truckfella's Avatar
truckfella truckfella is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 394
truckfella is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Interesting...please expand a little bit on what you saw


Quote:
Originally Posted by saskdiesel
I had the glorious opportunity to be a GM tech when the Cadillac V8-6-4 engines were starting to show their age.
Needless to say I am forever biased against cylinder deactivation.
That and 4 cyl Fiero's....
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 03-01-2007, 09:21 AM
Krewat's Avatar
Krewat Krewat is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Long Island USA
Posts: 34,301
Krewat has a superb reputationKrewat has a superb reputationKrewat has a superb reputationKrewat has a superb reputationKrewat has a superb reputationKrewat has a superb reputationKrewat has a superb reputationKrewat has a superb reputationKrewat has a superb reputationKrewat has a superb reputationKrewat has a superb reputation
In my opinion:

because the V8 and the V10 get almost the same mileage, cylinder deactivation on the V10 will be a waste.

If 8 cylinders doesn't get better mileage, why would 5 cylinders firing and 5 cylinder dragging get any better?

The benefits are probably SO small as not to notice.
__________________
- art k. - Moderator for the Superduty, V10, 6.2L and FE forums
'13 Taurus SHO 3.5L Ecoboost w/Perf Pkg
'01 F250SD SC SB XLT V10 4x4 Volant CAI Hedman headers 5-star custom tunes on SCT X3
'97 Cougar XR7 30th Anniv Edition 4.6L
'74 F250 Highboy FE390 deceased!
I've been wrong before, I'll be wrong again. Just wait and see. ®
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 03-01-2007, 10:16 AM
Ricohman's Avatar
Ricohman Ricohman is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 880
Ricohman is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by truckfella
Interesting...please expand a little bit on what you saw
Where do I begin.
ECU failures.
Solenoid failures ( A pair of these above each cylinder and they live inside the valve covers).
Exteme wear in deactivated cylinders (due to the always malfunctioning TB injection pooling fuel at the closed intake valve of a deactivated cylinder).
We used to convert these cars to run without the deactivation as the solenoids would sometimes stick halfway open and closed in cold weather.
Now I am sure that modern technology has taken care of all these problems but for the 1 or 2 years they made this motor I am sure the failure rate of these early examples was at least 90% where I worked.
I would like to see a nice running example again though!
__________________
2010 F350 4x4 6.8 XLT XTR CC
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 03-01-2007, 11:21 AM
Big Orn's Avatar
Big Orn Big Orn is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: NE Texas
Posts: 5,643
Big Orn has a very good reputation on FTE.Big Orn has a very good reputation on FTE.Big Orn has a very good reputation on FTE.
I had a Cad Seville once - 8-6-4 cylinder FUBAR. Weak as a kitten. Before I talked the wife into selling it, I had deactivated the deactivation.
__________________
Staring too long at your own navel leaves one only to stare at the difference in another’s. The reaction to that difference tells much about one’s inability to stare at own navel. - Krewat 2006
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 03-01-2007, 02:03 PM
V10_Cougar's Avatar
V10_Cougar V10_Cougar is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 605
V10_Cougar is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Orn
I had a Cad Seville once - 8-6-4 cylinder FUBAR. Weak as a kitten. Before I talked the wife into selling it, I had deactivated the deactivation.


hehehehe FUBAR
__________________
1999 FORD F-250, V10 4x4 4.30 LS
6" Lift, 37 Inch Super Swampers, GIBSON Exhaust
2001 Ford Mustang SVT Cobra
1968 Mercury Cougar - Sold
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 03-01-2007, 02:12 PM
sewerat's Avatar
sewerat sewerat is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Brooksdale, ON
Posts: 424
sewerat is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
I Have Often Thought About Trying To Build One Of Those Motors With The Right Type Of Deactivation That Is Actually Required But I Am Not A Smart Enough Man To Do So. What I Beilive Needs To Happen Is Have A Motor In A Configuartion That As Power Is Deemed Required By Symtrifical Force Then Each Cylinder Responds, Hench In Idle Mode You Would Be Running On Only 1 Cylinder And As You Stepped On The Pedal More Would Go. I Would Think That Might Make More Sense As Like Krewat Said All You Are Doing Is Dragging The Other Dead Still Creating Friction Cylinders Along For The Ride When The Shut Down.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 03-01-2007, 02:21 PM
85e150six4mtod 85e150six4mtod is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 15,849
85e150six4mtod has a superb reputation85e150six4mtod has a superb reputation85e150six4mtod has a superb reputation85e150six4mtod has a superb reputation85e150six4mtod has a superb reputation85e150six4mtod has a superb reputation85e150six4mtod has a superb reputation85e150six4mtod has a superb reputation85e150six4mtod has a superb reputation85e150six4mtod has a superb reputation85e150six4mtod has a superb reputation
The cad system was done by Eaton, and rejected by Ford. Cad picked it up and it was a toad.

The new stuff is all electronic. I drove a couple of Honda's with it the other day...you can't tell when it's on 3 vs. 6. Except on one model, a light came on to tell you.

As for a diff in mileage, not sure what the claim is, but it has to vary widely depending on how and where you are driving. I think you could keep it from activating at all with a heavy foot. (except on coast)

Like most of the other stuff, this will get cheaper as time goes by, and I see gas is over $3 again for the good stuff, so look for more mileage gimmicks, good and bad, to come.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 03-05-2007, 05:16 PM
dallbright's Avatar
dallbright dallbright is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Wyoming County, New York
Posts: 259
dallbright is starting off with a positive reputation.
I think on the 16 cyl. locomotive engines (newer, but not new, electronically controlled models) the engine idles on less than a full complement of cylinders. It may be done for environmental reasons, fuel economy reasons, or harmonic vibration reasons. The newest have automatic engine start and stop functions, but the ones before that might idle for hours on end. I'm not sure how they accomplish it, just know the engine changes its sound and vibration pattern on some sort of patterned rhythm.


Once the hardware and electronics are perfected for "camshaft-less" engines, seems an engine could be programmed to run on any number of cylinders at any time for any duration with minimal "dead cylinder" drag. The reliability should be right up there with EFI systems as the same type computers and programs would be used.

I do recall read about a Volvo "big-truck" engine having been developed to run cam-less about 8 years ago, haven't heard much since. Think of the power savings, not having to turn all that valve train hardware.

Last edited by dallbright; 03-05-2007 at 05:25 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 03-05-2007, 10:10 PM
super 6.8 super 6.8 is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Wichita
Posts: 490
super 6.8 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Cylinder deactivation will never work with a manual valve train. The pumping losses will negate any gains from not firing a cylinder. An engine with solenoid actuated valves my get some benefit. Then the dead cylinder could open the exhaust valve on the compression stroke.
__________________
2007 F250 CC 4wd v10 4:30 5 sp auto with moonroof
2007 Mountaineer Premier 4.6 6 sp auto
1999 Mustang 3.8 auto
1997 T Bird 4.6 auto
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 03-06-2007, 08:43 AM
Ricohman's Avatar
Ricohman Ricohman is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 880
Ricohman is starting off with a positive reputation.
Smile

Quote:
Originally Posted by dallbright
I think on the 16 cyl. locomotive engines (newer, but not new, electronically controlled models) the engine idles on less than a full complement of cylinders. It may be done for environmental reasons, fuel economy reasons, or harmonic vibration reasons. The newest have automatic engine start and stop functions, but the ones before that might idle for hours on end. I'm not sure how they accomplish it, just know the engine changes its sound and vibration pattern on some sort of patterned rhythm.


Once the hardware and electronics are perfected for "camshaft-less" engines, seems an engine could be programmed to run on any number of cylinders at any time for any duration with minimal "dead cylinder" drag. The reliability should be right up there with EFI systems as the same type computers and programs would be used.

I do recall read about a Volvo "big-truck" engine having been developed to run cam-less about 8 years ago, haven't heard much since. Think of the power savings, not having to turn all that valve train hardware.
We already have "camshaft-less engines".......2 strokes!
__________________
2010 F350 4x4 6.8 XLT XTR CC
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 03-07-2007, 07:23 PM
boggerted boggerted is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,073
boggerted is starting off with a positive reputation.
We already have "camshaft-less engines".......2 strokes!

LOL! Someone sould make a v10 2stroke. It would sound like a amplified swarm of bees. However, i read int he manual that if the engine senses a overheating condition, that it will deactivate every other cylinder and open the valves so that they become like mini air coolers for the engine.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 03-08-2007, 09:31 AM
Ricohman's Avatar
Ricohman Ricohman is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 880
Ricohman is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by boggerted
We already have "camshaft-less engines".......2 strokes!

LOL! Someone sould make a v10 2stroke. It would sound like a amplified swarm of bees. However, i read int he manual that if the engine senses a overheating condition, that it will deactivate every other cylinder and open the valves so that they become like mini air coolers for the engine.
Our V10's deativate something but its not the valves.
No solenoids to keep valves open here.
However I do like the idea of a V10 2 stroker!
__________________
2010 F350 4x4 6.8 XLT XTR CC
Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2007, 09:31 AM
Reply

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Performance, Engines & Troubleshooting > Modular V10 (6.8l)

Tags
2007, 46, change, cut, cylinder, deactivation, engine, f150, ford, reliability, shut, shutdown, sound, system, v10

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.5.2 ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Statement - Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.

vbulletin Admin Backup