Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > General > Ford vs The Competition
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?


Ford vs The Competition Technical discussion and comparison ONLY. Trolls will not be tolerated.

Welcome to Ford-Trucks Forums!
Welcome to Ford-Trucks.com.

You are currently viewing our forums as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Ford-Trucks Forums community today!





 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-13-2007, 12:22 PM
dono dono is offline
Gone but not forgotten.
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 6,521
dono has much to be proud ofdono has much to be proud ofdono has much to be proud ofdono has much to be proud ofdono has much to be proud ofdono has much to be proud ofdono has much to be proud ofdono has much to be proud ofdono has much to be proud ofdono has much to be proud of
Pickup tests

While getting my truck inspected, I read an article in Mechanics Illustrated where they conducted a series of tests on Ford, Chevy, Toyota and Nissan pickups. I was surprised that the F150 came in last (The Nissan was first). in almost every test. The quarter mile time was really bad for the Ford, they ran empty and with 1000lbs aboard and the other 3 trucks with 1000lbs. beat the empty Ford. They attributed the bad results for Ford to the newer designs of the other 3 and said Ford will be playing catch up.
__________________
Dono
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 02-13-2007, 12:33 PM
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy NumberDummy is offline
Ford Parts Specialist
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Hacienda Heights CA
Posts: 54,074
NumberDummy has a superb reputationNumberDummy has a superb reputationNumberDummy has a superb reputationNumberDummy has a superb reputationNumberDummy has a superb reputationNumberDummy has a superb reputationNumberDummy has a superb reputationNumberDummy has a superb reputationNumberDummy has a superb reputationNumberDummy has a superb reputationNumberDummy has a superb reputation
Quote:
Originally Posted by dono
While getting my truck inspected, I read an article in Mechanics Illustrated where they conducted a series of tests on Ford, Chevy, Toyota and Nissan pickups. I was surprised that the F150 came in last (The Nissan was first). in almost every test. The quarter mile time was really bad for the Ford, they ran empty and with 1000lbs aboard and the other 3 trucks with 1000lbs. beat the empty Ford. They attributed the bad results for Ford to the newer designs of the other 3 and said Ford will be playing catch up.
It's from Popular Mechanics, there are several threads on it now.

"Popular Mechanics tests full size pickups...and the winner is..."

"Anybody seen Popular Mechanics?"
__________________
Bill / Retired Ford Parts Manager / Part number research: 1928/2001 trucks & 1928/89 passenger cars.

2013 Escape FWD 2.0L Eco-Boost

Last edited by NumberDummy; 02-13-2007 at 12:38 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 02-13-2007, 12:58 PM
tjc transport's Avatar
tjc transport tjc transport is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Marlboro Mental Hospital
Posts: 31,918
tjc transport has a superb reputationtjc transport has a superb reputationtjc transport has a superb reputationtjc transport has a superb reputationtjc transport has a superb reputationtjc transport has a superb reputationtjc transport has a superb reputationtjc transport has a superb reputationtjc transport has a superb reputationtjc transport has a superb reputationtjc transport has a superb reputation
how much ya wanna bet the nissan and yoda had big ol V8 in them, and the ford had a V6???
__________________
Tom
JOIN THE NEW JERSEY CHAPTER CLICK HERE
owner of almost too many fords.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 02-13-2007, 01:11 PM
SMIGGS's Avatar
SMIGGS SMIGGS is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,452
SMIGGS has a great reputation on FTE.SMIGGS has a great reputation on FTE.SMIGGS has a great reputation on FTE.SMIGGS has a great reputation on FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by NumberDummy
It's from Popular Mechanics, there are several threads on it now.

"Popular Mechanics tests full size pickups...and the winner is..."

"Anybody seen Popular Mechanics?"
Good one! The funny thing is that after the last page of the truck test there is a 2 page Nissan advertisement! ( actually I'm guessing on that one )

"And the Popular Mechanics truck of the year award goes to..."
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by BLK94F150 View Post
It's an internet forum, get used to it. It's like having a drunk conversation with every single person in the bar minus the "I love you man".
2000 Excursion Limited - 7.3 Diesel - Mine
2005 Freestar Sport - The wife's
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 02-13-2007, 01:32 PM
freirefishing's Avatar
freirefishing freirefishing is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Clearwater, Fl
Posts: 4,981
freirefishing has a great reputation on FTE.freirefishing has a great reputation on FTE.freirefishing has a great reputation on FTE.freirefishing has a great reputation on FTE.freirefishing has a great reputation on FTE.freirefishing has a great reputation on FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by tjc transport
how much ya wanna bet the nissan and yoda had big ol V8 in them, and the ford had a V6???
c'mon man please..

denial only worked for bill clinton for a short time
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 02-13-2007, 03:29 PM
wendell borror wendell borror is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,147
wendell borror has a great reputation on FTE.wendell borror has a great reputation on FTE.wendell borror has a great reputation on FTE.wendell borror has a great reputation on FTE.
I've heard several sources say that the f-150 doesn't feel like 300 hp. The more honest testers contribute it to the automatic transmision. Seems it robs alot of power and with slugish shifts, you don't feel the power that the motor has, or get it to the ground. I don't have a new 150, so I'm not talking from experience, but repeating what some mags have said. I wonder how the 5.4 would feel with a manual tranny in an f-150, how much of a difference it would make. I guess we'll never know, seeings how you can't a manual tranny with the 5.4.
__________________
2009 FORD RANGER fx4 off/road, 5-speed manual, torson diff and rancho's!

2008 mercury mariner 4x4 V-6, automatic.

1987 jeep wrangler, 258, 5-speed
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 02-13-2007, 05:55 PM
dono dono is offline
Gone but not forgotten.
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 6,521
dono has much to be proud ofdono has much to be proud ofdono has much to be proud ofdono has much to be proud ofdono has much to be proud ofdono has much to be proud ofdono has much to be proud ofdono has much to be proud ofdono has much to be proud ofdono has much to be proud of
Quote:
Originally Posted by SMIGGS
Good one! The funny thing is that after the last page of the truck test there is a 2 page Nissan advertisement! ( actually I'm guessing on that one )

"And the Popular Mechanics truck of the year award goes to..."
I don't know about that, but following the pickup article was some words praising the Ford Superduty.
__________________
Dono
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 02-13-2007, 06:19 PM
hofuf hofuf is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 553
hofuf is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Sounds like a real world test afterall, I always load my pickup with a heavy load and drag race it at the local track. These tests are really stupid. What I really care about are dependability, workability (e.g. low end grunt) and total cost of ownership.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 02-13-2007, 07:24 PM
93RangerXL4x2's Avatar
93RangerXL4x2 93RangerXL4x2 is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 963
93RangerXL4x2 is starting off with a positive reputation.
its all BS. I bet you the F-150 beats hands down but just dont say it so people buy the mag, I bet Nissan and Toyota thorw them a few bucks cause there make it back in tryuck sales, come a Nissan oy Yoda can not touch any of the big 3. loaded or unloded on or off road. all the big 3 out perform them. They are helping the forein automakes sell ther product vs the US. If the Magizine said:

Ford F-150#1
Chevy/GMC#2
Dodge Ram#3
Nissan#4
Toyota#5

Nobody would buy a Nissan or Toyota if they actully said how much better the ford chev and dodge are nobody would buy the other 2 truck. they know peopel well buy it any ways they are payed to take away sales.
__________________
1999 Ford F-150 Reg Cab, 4.2L V6 8 ft Box, HD Suspension, 309,986 kms+
2002 Ford 250 SD 8' EX Cab 230,000K+ Original
1995 Diesel 7.3L PSD 747,000KMS,
1998 Ford F-150 Ex Cab XL 4.2L 3.55 460,948kms
1994,1995 f-150's R/Cab both Original, Ford For Life
s youtube FordmanHaulit3002010
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 02-13-2007, 07:36 PM
BLK94F150 BLK94F150 is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: None of your business
Posts: 3,077
BLK94F150 has a great reputation on FTE.BLK94F150 has a great reputation on FTE.BLK94F150 has a great reputation on FTE.BLK94F150 has a great reputation on FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 93RangerXL4x2
its all BS. I bet you the F-150 beats hands down but just dont say it so people buy the mag, I bet Nissan and Toyota thorw them a few bucks cause there make it back in tryuck sales, come a Nissan oy Yoda can not touch any of the big 3. loaded or unloded on or off road. all the big 3 out perform them. They are helping the forein automakes sell ther product vs the US. If the Magizine said:

Ford F-150#1
Chevy/GMC#2
Dodge Ram#3
Nissan#4
Toyota#5

Nobody would buy a Nissan or Toyota if they actully said how much better the ford chev and dodge are nobody would buy the other 2 truck. they know peopel well buy it any ways they are payed to take away sales.
You're pathetic. Maybe if they actually were better, then they'd rank them that way.

Based on thier OBJECTIVE tests, that's how they fell. Maybe next time Ford will actually put out an engine that performs, a transmission that has more than 4 misspaced gears, and isn't overweight for it's class.

You people and your conspiracy theories must be dilusional.

Mike
__________________
Confusing people's opinions with facts here since 09-30-2002
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 02-13-2007, 07:38 PM
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy NumberDummy is offline
Ford Parts Specialist
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Hacienda Heights CA
Posts: 54,074
NumberDummy has a superb reputationNumberDummy has a superb reputationNumberDummy has a superb reputationNumberDummy has a superb reputationNumberDummy has a superb reputationNumberDummy has a superb reputationNumberDummy has a superb reputationNumberDummy has a superb reputationNumberDummy has a superb reputationNumberDummy has a superb reputationNumberDummy has a superb reputation
Quote:
Originally Posted by 93RangerXL4x2
its all BS. I bet you the F-150 beats hands down but just dont say it so people buy the mag, I bet Nissan and Toyota thorw them a few bucks cause there make it back in tryuck sales, come a Nissan oy Yoda can not touch any of the big 3. loaded or unloded on or off road. all the big 3 out perform them. They are helping the forein automakes sell ther product vs the US. If the Magizine said:

Ford F-150#1
Chevy/GMC#2
Dodge Ram#3
Nissan#4
Toyota#5

Nobody would buy a Nissan or Toyota if they actully said how much better the ford chev and dodge are nobody would buy the other 2 truck. they know peopel well buy it any ways they are payed to take away sales.
Just where do you get your facts from? Every day it's the same BS...yadda..yadda..yadda. If you backed up your "Ford Almighty" posts with facts, I might tend to believe some of them. But until you test the competition, you have no credibility...none.
__________________
Bill / Retired Ford Parts Manager / Part number research: 1928/2001 trucks & 1928/89 passenger cars.

2013 Escape FWD 2.0L Eco-Boost
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 02-13-2007, 07:42 PM
93RangerXL4x2's Avatar
93RangerXL4x2 93RangerXL4x2 is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 963
93RangerXL4x2 is starting off with a positive reputation.
it is over weight for a reason, which also sets it apart. Why have I not seen the New Tundra at dealer yet? Im waiting for a Test Drive mabe ill test drive a Titan.
__________________
1999 Ford F-150 Reg Cab, 4.2L V6 8 ft Box, HD Suspension, 309,986 kms+
2002 Ford 250 SD 8' EX Cab 230,000K+ Original
1995 Diesel 7.3L PSD 747,000KMS,
1998 Ford F-150 Ex Cab XL 4.2L 3.55 460,948kms
1994,1995 f-150's R/Cab both Original, Ford For Life
s youtube FordmanHaulit3002010

Last edited by 93RangerXL4x2; 02-13-2007 at 08:28 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 02-13-2007, 08:23 PM
john112deere's Avatar
john112deere john112deere is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Maine
Posts: 1,651
john112deere is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by hofuf
Sounds like a real world test afterall, I always load my pickup with a heavy load and drag race it at the local track. These tests are really stupid. What I really care about are dependability, workability (e.g. low end grunt) and total cost of ownership.
I see your point, and agree for the most part.

But if I want to haul anything heavy with my 4-banger Ranger, I have to plan around hills, traffic, etc. because even with no load it can barely keep up with normal urban traffic. Put more than a couple hundred pounds in the back and its downright dangerous in heavy, fast city traffic (I'm originally from MA...).
__________________
1997 Ranger XLT supercab flareside
2.3L 4-cyl, 4x2, 5-speed manual, 232k miles
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 02-13-2007, 08:31 PM
93RangerXL4x2's Avatar
93RangerXL4x2 93RangerXL4x2 is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 963
93RangerXL4x2 is starting off with a positive reputation.
I use to Have a 2.3L I never put anything in the back I moved a bunch of boxes with misc stuff, but it did not weigh much.
__________________
1999 Ford F-150 Reg Cab, 4.2L V6 8 ft Box, HD Suspension, 309,986 kms+
2002 Ford 250 SD 8' EX Cab 230,000K+ Original
1995 Diesel 7.3L PSD 747,000KMS,
1998 Ford F-150 Ex Cab XL 4.2L 3.55 460,948kms
1994,1995 f-150's R/Cab both Original, Ford For Life
s youtube FordmanHaulit3002010
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 02-13-2007, 08:31 PM
BLK94F150 BLK94F150 is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: None of your business
Posts: 3,077
BLK94F150 has a great reputation on FTE.BLK94F150 has a great reputation on FTE.BLK94F150 has a great reputation on FTE.BLK94F150 has a great reputation on FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 93RangerXL4x2
it is over weight for a reason, which also sets it apart. Why have I not seen the New Tundra at dealer yet? Im waiting for a Test Drive mabe ill test drive a Titan.
Over weight = bad

So F150 = bad, is that what you're saying?

I'm trying to translate that last sentence there. I see that you're waiting for a test drive. You might be ill? Test drive a Titan you say? Maybe I will.

Mike
__________________
Confusing people's opinions with facts here since 09-30-2002
Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2007, 08:31 PM
Reply

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > General > Ford vs The Competition

Tags
pickup, tests

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:04 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.5.2 ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Statement - Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. FordŽ is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.

vbulletin Admin Backup