Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Ford Vans and other vehicles > Ranchero & 1961 - 1967 Econoline
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?


Welcome to Ford-Trucks Forums!
Welcome to Ford-Trucks.com.

You are currently viewing our forums as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Ford-Trucks Forums community today!





 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 07-20-2002, 09:20 AM
Boaz32 Boaz32 is offline
Freshman User
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Albuquerque
Posts: 41
Boaz32 is starting off with a positive reputation.
400-2V 1972 Ranchero?

Was the 400 available from the factory in a 1972 Ranchero 500?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-20-2002, 05:12 PM
bbtkd bbtkd is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 266
bbtkd is starting off with a positive reputation.
400-2V 1972 Ranchero?

>Was the 400 available from the factory in a 1972 Ranchero
>500?

I have the Ford showroom brochure right here, and it says that the options were 250 (inline six), 302 2V, 351 2V, 351 4V, 400 2V, and 429 4V. Several 351 motors were available, including the 351CJ, the 351C 2V, the 351C 4V (higher compression than the CJ!), and one or two versions of the 351W.

The 400 was rated 172 HP @4,000 RPM, and 298 ft/lbs @2,200 RPM. It had a compression ratio of 8.5:1 (I have also seen this reported as 8.4:1 but it really does not matter)...



Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-09-2002, 11:21 AM
blu93gt blu93gt is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: space city
Posts: 356
blu93gt is starting off with a positive reputation.
400-2V 1972 Ranchero?

__________________
Brad
'01 Sport-Trac
'75 Ranchero 500
'93 Mustang GT
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-10-2002, 11:57 PM
trinogt's Avatar
trinogt trinogt is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Eustis FL
Posts: 2,349
trinogt is starting off with a positive reputation.
400-2V 1972 Ranchero?

The 400 in 72 was more torquey than the later years. They are a great engine to beef up! It doesn't take much, either.
The 351 Clevelands (Boss, 4V, and CJ) lost a lot of power in 1972, but it is a simple matter of reversing what the factory did to re-gain the horsepower.
The 351C 4V was rated at higher hp than the CJ. CJ had open chamber heads with less compression, and are more prone to ping. But, they had 4 bolt mains, which is a bonus!
Mark


http://www.ford-trucks.com/user_gallery/displaythumbnail.php?&photoid=5362&.jpg
Ford started it; Ford will finish it!

__________________
Mark
Sales Consultant
Prestige Ford, Mount Dora, Florida
1998 B2500 2.5 liter OHC
http://www.ford-trucks.com/user_gall...toid=5362&.jpg
Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2002, 11:57 PM
Reply

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Ford Vans and other vehicles > Ranchero & 1961 - 1967 Econoline

Tags
1972, 400, 429, 500, 72, boss, brochure, engine, factory, florida, ford, horsepower, options, ranchero, review

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Statement - Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. FordŽ is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.

vbulletin Admin Backup