2004 - 2008 F150 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008 Ford F150's with 5.4 V8, 4.6 V8 engine
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

5.4L 3V spark plug change question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #46  
Old 01-02-2007, 09:48 PM
Good Guy's Avatar
Good Guy
Good Guy is offline
New User
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why does the TSB only reference 2004's? Doesn't this issue apply to 05's?
 
  #47  
Old 01-02-2007, 09:50 PM
Chris1450's Avatar
Chris1450
Chris1450 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: buckley WA
Posts: 351
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think it applies to 2004- 2007. I haven't heard of any head redesign.
 
  #48  
Old 01-02-2007, 09:53 PM
CMOS's Avatar
CMOS
CMOS is offline
Laughing Gas
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Magnolia, TX
Posts: 1,055
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
So they DON'T want any "Anti-Sieze" (Lubricant) on the threads ???

Ain't that question a hoot!? I will be putting anti-sieze on my threads.

However, can anyone think of why FORD would NOT want ant-sieze on the threads? There's got to be a reason for this.

CMOS
 
  #49  
Old 01-02-2007, 09:58 PM
04 FX4 Lineman's Avatar
04 FX4 Lineman
04 FX4 Lineman is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 611
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by CMOS
They sure do - Ford suggests doing so on the Spark Plug TSB here. See the "NOTE" towards the bottom.

CMOS
CMOS: Thanx for the TSB the more I read the more nervous I get what a complete design nightmare!!!!!
 
  #50  
Old 01-02-2007, 10:24 PM
Chris1450's Avatar
Chris1450
Chris1450 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: buckley WA
Posts: 351
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
why FORD would NOT want ant-sieze on the threads
________

all I can think of is that anti sieze might cause more galvanic corrosion between the aluminum and steel. Probably wrong though.
 
  #51  
Old 01-02-2007, 11:45 PM
04 FX4 Lineman's Avatar
04 FX4 Lineman
04 FX4 Lineman is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 611
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They may be afraid that the plugs will loosen up with anti seize on the threads like the early design plugs with only 4 threads???? I don't think there will be a re-design until the 6.2L engine and I wouldn't bet on that. I read a thread from a ford tech and he owns an 04 and he said he was going to drive it to a 100K then dump it that is what a poor design these heads are!!!
 
  #52  
Old 01-03-2007, 12:17 AM
Tylus's Avatar
Tylus
Tylus is offline
MMNC (SS)(Ret)

Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: SE Georgia
Posts: 11,309
Received 30 Likes on 22 Posts
the TSB says to put anti-sieze on the threads and NOT the anode. The antisieze won't cause galvanic corrosion either.
 
  #53  
Old 01-03-2007, 07:28 AM
CMOS's Avatar
CMOS
CMOS is offline
Laughing Gas
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Magnolia, TX
Posts: 1,055
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Originally Posted by tylus
the TSB says to put anti-sieze on the threads and NOT the anode. The antisieze won't cause galvanic corrosion either.

Tylus, it doesn't read it that way. See text below:

"ONCE THE SPARK PLUGS HAVE ALL BEEN REMOVED, NEW PLUGS SHOULD BE INSTALLED USING A FILM COATING OF NICKEL ANTI-SEIZE ON THE GROUND ELECTRODE SHIELD OF THE NEW SPARK PLUG. DO NOT COAT THE ELECTRODE STRAP OR THE PLUG WILL MISFIRE. THE NEW PLUGS SHOULD BE INSTALLED WITH NO LUBRICANT ON THE THREADS AND TORQUED TO SPECIFICATION, 25 LB-FT"


Pretty clear I think. Still not sure why. An above member mentioned thet FORD may be concerned about the SP loosening. That's a possibility...

CMOS
 
  #54  
Old 01-03-2007, 07:56 AM
jeffrey101965's Avatar
jeffrey101965
jeffrey101965 is offline
New User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Once you remove the plugs and look at the shape of the plug vs the shape of the hole I think the issue is better understood...looks to me like it's the "ground electrode shield" as Ford calls it in the TSB thats causing the problem of getting these out after some carbon has built up. I think they're trying to prevent the carbon from building up on the "ground electrode shield" with the anti-seize. I have a picture of the plugs but I can't seem to get it to copy here.
 
  #55  
Old 01-03-2007, 08:13 AM
CMOS's Avatar
CMOS
CMOS is offline
Laughing Gas
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Magnolia, TX
Posts: 1,055
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Originally Posted by jeffrey101965
Once you remove the plugs and look at the shape of the plug vs the shape of the hole I think the issue is better understood...looks to me like it's the "ground electrode shield" as Ford calls it in the TSB thats causing the problem of getting these out after some carbon has built up. I think they're trying to prevent the carbon from building up on the "ground electrode shield" with the anti-seize. I have a picture of the plugs but I can't seem to get it to copy here.


Agreed. Ford appears to be trying to reduce the rust/carbon on the elongated ground electrode shield.

CMOS
 
  #56  
Old 01-03-2007, 09:36 AM
KevinM's Avatar
KevinM
KevinM is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,479
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
TSB 06-15-2 refers to 2004 thru 2005 5.4's for plug removal instructions. I also think it's due to the extended plug design. There maybe an electrolysis effect of aluminum against the plug material (dissimilar metals) causing enough corrosion to weld the plug in place. An anti sieze material prevents this from happening.
Wasn't there a redesign of the plugs! I thought there was!
 

Last edited by KevinM; 01-03-2007 at 09:54 AM.
  #57  
Old 01-03-2007, 08:47 PM
ohboy44's Avatar
ohboy44
ohboy44 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 392
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by KevinM
TSB 06-15-2 refers to 2004 thru 2005 5.4's for plug removal instructions. I also think it's due to the extended plug design. There maybe an electrolysis effect of aluminum against the plug material (dissimilar metals) causing enough corrosion to weld the plug in place. An anti sieze material prevents this from happening.
Wasn't there a redesign of the plugs! I thought there was!
There is no electrolysis between the aluminum and the plug. It is carbon build up that binds the ground shield as you turn it out and causes it to come apart. That's why it's important to follow the TSB, but I have found that waiting at least 30 min or longer for the penetrating oil to wick around the threads and work on loosening the carbon will give you good results.
And the Kroil brand penetrating oil is the best for doing this.
I've gotten many plugs out on high mileage engines doing this.
I've also brought the engine up to operating temp before doing this much to the displeasure of the people I work with
 
  #58  
Old 01-03-2007, 09:06 PM
CMOS's Avatar
CMOS
CMOS is offline
Laughing Gas
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Magnolia, TX
Posts: 1,055
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Where can I buy some of the Kroil penetrating oil?

CMOS
 
  #59  
Old 01-03-2007, 10:28 PM
HamerDown's Avatar
HamerDown
HamerDown is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question

Ok I gotta ask...what's UP with these spark plugs for crying out loud?
I was hoping to purchase one of these (06-7) trucks, doing research here. I stop by my machine shop and ask a friend what issues do you see with the 5.4 Triton engins. He simply says..."the spark plugs blow out of them"...and he was serious!

So now I'm reading that the newer engine have a pretty good chance of the spark plugs breaking in the head...WTF you gotta be kidding me right?

I almost had heart failure once when I tried to pull a bad (swollen) Glo-plug out of my Ford Diesel. Thought I was going to pull the head but after 4 hours on one glo-plug and a lot of bad nerves I got it out!

I've always used anti-sieze on spark plugs w/alumium heads ...it's a must!

So now I gotta be sweating bullets about a simply spark plug change...?
And I thought changing plugs on my Vette was a PITA...
 

Last edited by HamerDown; 01-03-2007 at 10:43 PM.
  #60  
Old 01-03-2007, 10:54 PM
04 FX4 Lineman's Avatar
04 FX4 Lineman
04 FX4 Lineman is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 611
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This ain't no joke ford uses a long reach plug which builds up with carbon and the hole in the head is so small the plug with carbon won't fit through it and when you screw the plug out it pulls in half andleaves the ground electrode int he head which then takes a special tool to get it out which only ford has and if you should loose it in the head then you have to pull the head very expensive not sure if they have made any changes for the 07 model year heard they were coming out with a new style pug???? Would do a lot of research before I bought another one!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 


Quick Reply: 5.4L 3V spark plug change question



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:24 PM.