Ford Truck Enthusiasts, The Internet's Leading Ford Trucks Resource, F150
 

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Diesel > General Diesel Discussion
New! Use your Facebook, Google, AIM & Yahoo accounts to securely log into this site, click logo to login  

General Diesel Discussion SPONSORED BY:






Is F-150 Still King?
 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 12-27-2006, 08:08 AM
Diesel Man 03 Diesel Man 03 is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 158
Diesel Man 03 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Question ultra low sulphur fuel

I have a 03 with the 7.3 powerstroke. I am wondering if using this new fuel of which is for 07 diesels will be a problem for my truck?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 12-27-2006, 08:23 AM
tex25025's Avatar
tex25025 tex25025 is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 6,670
tex25025 has a great reputation on FTE. tex25025 has a great reputation on FTE. tex25025 has a great reputation on FTE. tex25025 has a great reputation on FTE. tex25025 has a great reputation on FTE. tex25025 has a great reputation on FTE.
No, it's not going to be a problem for your truck, it is more refined then the low sulphur diesel, which makes it cleaner, it's like the difference between an 87 v. 89 v. 93. 87 being the least refined, 89 being a little better, and of course, 93 being the most refined out of the three. Unfortunately, it is mandated by law that I believe all pumps have to have it in 2010(I could be wrong, but I believe that is date), so you won't have a choice by that time in case you still have that diesel. Hopefully, the kinks would have been worked out by the companies on their new engines and then it would be time to get a new(er) one.
__________________
'06 6.0L Turbo Diesel King Ranch DRW 4.30 Gears
Bunch of goodies that add up to 508hp/721ftlbs

2010 Platinum F-150 3.55 Gears
Nothing but stock
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 12-27-2006, 11:13 AM
BowTieHatr BowTieHatr is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Florence,SC
Posts: 2,725
BowTieHatr has a very good reputation on FTE. BowTieHatr has a very good reputation on FTE. BowTieHatr has a very good reputation on FTE.
the only thing to beware of is leaks. the new fuel is a great cleaner so any buildup preventing leaks like the ever popular water drain valve, it will wash it away. also keep an eye on your fuel filter and make sure it is ok because of the same reason.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 12-27-2006, 06:41 PM
bigredtruckmi's Avatar
bigredtruckmi bigredtruckmi is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Grand Ledge, Michigan
Posts: 4,345
bigredtruckmi has a good reputation on FTE. bigredtruckmi has a good reputation on FTE.
I agree with the other two posters. It will affect older diesels (pre 94 if I remember right). Those will need an additive for lubrication as they was designed for higher sulfur fuel which lubricated the fuel system.

You will notice some loss of fuel economy with the new fuel.
__________________
red 04 F250 build date 04/04 6.0 PSD ,auto,cc, xlt ,sb, moon roof, 4X4, off road pkg, sports pkg., tow pkg,camper pkg,FX4, electric shift on fly
93 f350 7.3 , 5 speed manual, ext cab, long box 240K+ miles
1967 C700 farm truck
30 ft travel trailer
Vietnam Vet/ OS1 USN/USNR retired 26 years
B5 soydiesel user
Sirius radio
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 12-28-2006, 06:43 AM
ckal704's Avatar
ckal704 ckal704 is online now
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Lancaster County PA
Posts: 2,350
ckal704 has a great reputation on FTE. ckal704 has a great reputation on FTE. ckal704 has a great reputation on FTE. ckal704 has a great reputation on FTE. ckal704 has a great reputation on FTE. ckal704 has a great reputation on FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by tex25025
it's like the difference between an 87 v. 89 v. 93. 87 being the least refined, 89 being a little better, and of course, 93 being the most refined out of the three.
I could be wrong, but my understanding has always been that gasoline is "refined" equally and detergent additives and such are present in in adequate amounts across all grades. Octane rating simply is a numerical indicator of a fuel's resistance to ignition. Low octane fuels being easier to ignite for use in low compression engines; and high octane fuels being more difficult to ignite for use in high compression engines. Higher octane ratings are needed in high compresssion ratio engines to prevent detonation (the fuel reigniting elsewhere in the combustion chamber due to the increased compression of the unburnt fuel by the fuel that is already burning having being ignited by the spark plug) and preignition (the fuel ignites itself spontaneously due to the heat of compression before the spark occurs in a high compression ratio engine). Preignition in the shorter term and detonation over the long run are damaging influences in the longevity if the pistons, pins and rods of the engine.
According to everything I have ever read from reputable sources, using expensive high octane fuel in a low compression ratio engine is a flat out waste of money and, in fact, can actually cause performance and economy to suffer. It is one of the most common misconceptions about octane rating out there, and many people are fooled into thinking high octane = high power.
I have not seen a commercial for high octane fuel on tv for quite a while, but I do know that whenever one aired, if you read the fine print, it always said "For engines that are designe to use high octane fuel" or "for engines that can benefit from the use of high octane fuels."
__________________
Kal

97 250 PSD Ex Cab Sd 4X4 ZF5 155k
Buncha low budget mods
"I tried being reasonable. I didn't like it."
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 12-28-2006, 01:32 PM
duffman77's Avatar
duffman77 duffman77 is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 793
duffman77 is starting off with a positive reputation.
The new fuel (ULSD) will meet a ASTM lubrication standard, the same one that the prior LSD was required to meet. If you didnt think you needed an additive before, you dont need one now. Many people run an additive anyway because lubricity and wear are inverse of one anouther, meaning you can further decrease your wear on your injectors with more lubricity, although eventually you will see diminishing returns, and where that point is, I dont believe anyone on this board can give you a true answear of that, only what they believe.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 12-29-2006, 01:59 PM
bowingo bowingo is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4
bowingo is starting off with a positive reputation.
We have a 2006 F250 super Duty power stroke Diesel. Bought in March, & since our purchase it seems that the price of Diesel fuel has steadily accelerated but has not come down along with gasoline prices. Can anyone venture an opinion on why?
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 12-29-2006, 02:03 PM
bigredtruckmi's Avatar
bigredtruckmi bigredtruckmi is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Grand Ledge, Michigan
Posts: 4,345
bigredtruckmi has a good reputation on FTE. bigredtruckmi has a good reputation on FTE.
Laws of supply and demand. We are in the middle of the heating season and that is where the extra diesel (if there is any) is going and we have to bid against that to get motor fuel.
__________________
red 04 F250 build date 04/04 6.0 PSD ,auto,cc, xlt ,sb, moon roof, 4X4, off road pkg, sports pkg., tow pkg,camper pkg,FX4, electric shift on fly
93 f350 7.3 , 5 speed manual, ext cab, long box 240K+ miles
1967 C700 farm truck
30 ft travel trailer
Vietnam Vet/ OS1 USN/USNR retired 26 years
B5 soydiesel user
Sirius radio
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 12-29-2006, 02:25 PM
origcharger origcharger is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,981
origcharger is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE. origcharger is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by bowingo
We have a 2006 F250 super Duty power stroke Diesel. Bought in March, & since our purchase it seems that the price of Diesel fuel has steadily accelerated but has not come down along with gasoline prices. Can anyone venture an opinion on why?
Think of how simple the diesel fuel market was in the summer of 2005, the majority was low sulfer #2 dyed and undyed.
Fast forward to late fall, early winter of 2006, what do we need to supply the market? ULSD #1 & #2 both dyed and undyed, low sulfer #1 & #2 dyed and undyed, heating season, tank, transporters & pipeline concerns so we keep the ULSD from being degraded to low sulfer fuel, all of this squeezes the supply system.
__________________
2004 E-450 6.0 147,000 miles
7,500 mile, 15 quart oil changes, 5W-40 Rotella.
UOAs consist of checking for metal on drain plug magnet. All stock, no mods. Dyed fuel with no additives. Never been reflashed.
Total parts replaced;
one EGR valve, one turbo.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 12-29-2006, 02:36 PM
Pocket's Avatar
Pocket Pocket is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Parker, CO
Posts: 5,665
Pocket is a splendid one to behold Pocket is a splendid one to behold Pocket is a splendid one to behold Pocket is a splendid one to behold Pocket is a splendid one to behold Pocket is a splendid one to behold Pocket is a splendid one to behold
ckal704, you are correct about octane differences in gasoline. All grades are refined to the same quality, but the higher octanes require more additives to prevent pre-detonation. More additives = higher cost of gasoline. It's not a performance enhancer.

As far as leaks go, yes switching to ULSD can cause leaks. The reason is the removal of aromatics in the new fuel. The aromatics cause the o-rings to swell. Over long periods of time, the o-rings have "adjusted" to the fuel, so switching to ULSD causes the o-rings to shrink slightly. The weak points on the 7.3L are the fuel bowl drain o-rings. It seems to be a problem with older and/or higher mileage PSD's, so chances are you will be ok.
__________________
Curtis
2002 F-250 PSD
Best time: 15.3 @ 86.8 MPH at Bandimere - 9/10/08

Truck Pics

Quote:
The phrase "It'll make a turd" is not considered a compliment when referring to the quality of dinner.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 12-31-2006, 09:15 AM
fellro86's Avatar
fellro86 fellro86 is online now
FTE Chapter Leader
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Marengo, Iowa
Posts: 8,466
fellro86 has a great reputation on FTE. fellro86 has a great reputation on FTE. fellro86 has a great reputation on FTE. fellro86 has a great reputation on FTE. fellro86 has a great reputation on FTE. fellro86 has a great reputation on FTE.
I just ran my first tank of ULSD through my old 6.9, and it seems to be fine. I did end up plugging my filtrs, so I guess it may be like running ethanol after having run standard gasoline for so long, fuel deposits get cleared out, and filters start to plug... I made it 100 miles before it started to show trouble, and the filters have been on for since last spring, but I don't run a lot of miles, only about 30,000 in the two years I have had the truck...
__________________
the workhorse:86 F250 4x4 6.9 Diesel 4-spd, 4.10 axles, holley red electric pump
the other workhorse 92 F350 2wd crew cab, 4.10 rear axle, 92 6bt Cummins, NV4500 with Gear Vendors overdrive
the project: 77 F250 Camper special 400 4 speed
Iowa Chapter leader
Come on down and join us in the Iowa chapter, or your own local chapter!! Thanks, Roger
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 12-31-2006, 09:31 AM
jbullfrog's Avatar
jbullfrog jbullfrog is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: CB Iowa
Posts: 387
jbullfrog is starting off with a positive reputation.
Dejavu sounds like Soy Diesel

Soy Diesel is being blended to meet the new LSD standards in alot of the Diesel markets. The problems that came with switching to Soy Diesel were blamed on the fuel and everyone assumed it was just like fry oil. Now that it is included in the mandated ULS fuel, people have payed attention to the "acts like a system cleaner which will plug filters.

It is not Soy Diesel that plugs the filters it is what has been flushed out of the pipelines, holding tanks, fuel transports, station tanks, fuel barrels on the farm, and your trucks tank.
__________________
'03 F250 SD Toredor Red over Arizona Beige - Crewcab, Short box, 4x4, 6 Liter Power Stroke, 5 - speed Torqueshift, SPA dual gauge (Boost over Pyrometer), Predator, B&W flip-over ball
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 12-31-2006, 10:05 AM
Leader Leader is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 887
Leader is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diesel Man 03
I have a 03 with the 7.3 powerstroke. I am wondering if using this new fuel of which is for 07 diesels will be a problem for my truck?
No... All the newer fuels are 100% backward compatable with the older engines & require NO extra additives.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 01-03-2007, 09:24 AM
Rick Oliver Rick Oliver is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 19
Rick Oliver is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BowTieHatr
the only thing to beware of is leaks. the new fuel is a great cleaner so any buildup preventing leaks like the ever popular water drain valve, it will wash it away. also keep an eye on your fuel filter and make sure it is ok because of the same reason.
Last night I put the new ultra low sulphur diesel fuel in my 97 250 7.3L for the first time. After about 20 miles the fuel filter light started coming on every time I accelerated quickly.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 01-03-2007, 10:05 AM
Beachbumcook's Avatar
Beachbumcook Beachbumcook is offline
Got Diesel?
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,924
Beachbumcook has a great reputation on FTE. Beachbumcook has a great reputation on FTE. Beachbumcook has a great reputation on FTE. Beachbumcook has a great reputation on FTE. Beachbumcook has a great reputation on FTE.
Wow... I must be the luckiest guy here....

I have been running ULSD fuel for the past 60 days or more with zero problems. I drive about 2,000 miles a month and even search out the ULSD pumps... and driveability has NOT been a problem. No idea on fuel filters as it is not time to change (plus it is too cold)... but no loss of fuel economy or power!!

However, I do add a double dose of Powerservice's anti-gel additive to every tank 100% of the time year round... but I did that even when using the older LSD fuel.

From now to 2010, you will only see ULSD fuel and in some areas... it will change tomorrow and stay that way. It produces less soot and carbon which is better for our EGR valves, Turbos, CAT's and mufflers... so this is why I search out ULSD fuel even though it is not mandated for my '03 truck.
__________________
03 Excursion 6.0L PSD
Magnafine P/S Fluid Filter
Racor By-Pass Oil Filter System
Dieselsite Coolant Filter
Bilstein Shocks/Rancho Steering Stabilizer
Fumoto Oil Drain Valve
BriteBox Headlight Module
Marinco AC Block Heater Plug
24" Wiper Blades
Window Screen - Radiator Bug Shield
Pioneer Airware XM Radio
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:50 AM.

Guidelines - Contact Us - Ford Truck Enthusiasts - Archive - Top

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 1997-2008 Internet Brands, Inc.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. FordŽ is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.