1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Dentsides Ford Truck
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Moser

F-130?!?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #16  
Old 12-23-2006, 08:28 PM
wildbill33's Avatar
wildbill33
wildbill33 is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Please show me where it says F130.

The plate doesn't look exactly like that, but pretty close.
the "F130" is listed under "type" instead of "model". I've (attempted) to post a picture in a gallery here:
https://www.ford-trucks.com/user_gal...?albumid=25870
I'll try to get some more pictures up later tonite or tomorrow as well. thanks!
 
  #17  
Old 12-23-2006, 08:40 PM
Mil1ion's Avatar
Mil1ion
Mil1ion is offline
New User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
There isn't any reference whatsoever in the shop manual.

everything but.


The 38 axle is a 5300 lb 3.73 dana 60.
 
  #18  
Old 12-23-2006, 08:46 PM
81-F-150-Explorer's Avatar
81-F-150-Explorer
81-F-150-Explorer is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Northern California
Posts: 8,786
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 17 Posts
That is very interesting.

Something simular happened in the 1980 to 1986 truck forum.

A guy had an F-200, with F-200 badges and all.

The truck was made or built for/in mexico.

Perhaps it's something simular???
 
  #19  
Old 12-24-2006, 03:40 AM
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
NumberDummy is offline
Ford Parts Specialist

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Simi Valley, CA
Posts: 88,826
Received 647 Likes on 542 Posts
Dso

DSO 72 : Truck was sold out of the Northern California District Sales Office.

It may have been ordered special by someone...but all the features on this truck are standard, otherwise the DSO number would have been a minimum of 4 digits.

If I remember correctly...F130 has something to do with the chassis type, I'll know for sure by next Wednesday.
 
  #20  
Old 12-24-2006, 01:03 PM
Mil1ion's Avatar
Mil1ion
Mil1ion is offline
New User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Bill, I already posted the chassis type codes in post #8.

For some reason the listing didn't make it to the Paper OEM Ford shop manual which I have in front of me.

I can scan it if you like ?

This F130 thing is a very unique topic.
 
  #21  
Old 12-24-2006, 01:10 PM
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
NumberDummy is offline
Ford Parts Specialist

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Simi Valley, CA
Posts: 88,826
Received 647 Likes on 542 Posts
The actual Ford parts book will have more info on chassis types than the shop manual. When I finally found my 73-79 microfische slides, they were so scratched I couldn't read them.

I ordered new ones...they should be here next week.
 
  #22  
Old 01-09-2007, 11:41 PM
wildbill33's Avatar
wildbill33
wildbill33 is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Just added a couple more pics to the gallery.

Nothing spectacular, just now you can get an actual view of the full truck.

Any advancement or new info from the microfische?
 
  #23  
Old 01-09-2007, 11:56 PM
LxMan1's Avatar
LxMan1
LxMan1 is offline
Moderator

Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Louisville,Ky.
Posts: 22,436
Received 13 Likes on 13 Posts
Well the GVWR is 100lbs more than my 77 F150. It is 6050 and has 5 lug wheels.
 
  #24  
Old 01-10-2007, 09:34 AM
bucks77ford's Avatar
bucks77ford
bucks77ford is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kasson, Minnesota
Posts: 5,037
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
That is really wierd!! One of the things could have been a body swap onto a 3/4 ton frame, but than wouldn't explain the F130. Maybe the 3 is a defect in the stamping of the VIN. Is the VIN on your title the same? But then, what about the GVWR? That is too many coincidences to not be the original truck, But you never know. Either it is an oddity or someone has gotten creative to cause such a controversy/hoax. It would be nice to what the VIN says that is stamped on the chassis.
 
  #25  
Old 01-10-2007, 11:22 PM
73f350sc's Avatar
73f350sc
73f350sc is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Murray
Posts: 1,254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well,
Seems to me you are all over looking one obvious possibility...VIN fraud..that door tag looks awful shiny for something that is that old. It wouldnt be the first time someone has fabricated a door Tag and VIN to try and fake out the DMV. I would verify that those tags match the VIN stamped into the frame....also look for signs that the truck has been repainted.

From my experience...when you register a vehicle at the DMV all they check is that the tag on the dash matches the one on the door and not if it matches a production VIN...there are even companies out there that sell new tags like that to restorers...I think that would explain the mysterious "Typo".

My honest thoughts....someone at some time put that fake tag on there to aviod registration costs or to cover up a stolen truck by changing the VIN and registering it a new state. Go to the DMV and ask for the Registration History on it and you may find that it was only recently put in the Sate's system from out of state.
-Chris
PS
Look carefully and you can see in that pic what looks to be the outline of the old slightly larger tag behind it on the edges.
 

Last edited by 73f350sc; 01-10-2007 at 11:28 PM.
  #26  
Old 01-10-2007, 11:54 PM
Mil1ion's Avatar
Mil1ion
Mil1ion is offline
New User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Replacement rating plates are only available with the original rubbing of the VIN# or Rating plate.

The rivets holding that plate on in that pic are also OEM.

I can't believe in the time this thread has been here I never suggested contacting Ford for a copy of the build sheet with the VIN# of this truck like others have done.

Let them figure out if they can.
 

Last edited by Mil1ion; 01-10-2007 at 11:59 PM.
  #27  
Old 01-11-2007, 11:57 AM
FordTrucksKickGM's Avatar
FordTrucksKickGM
FordTrucksKickGM is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Northeast Nebraska
Posts: 1,628
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This isnt the first time someone brought up the question of a half ton having 3/4 ton running gear. It would be interesting to see some of the original paper work on this truck. Perhaps it was a special order fleet vehicle or some other special order.
 
  #28  
Old 01-11-2007, 12:45 PM
hotroddually's Avatar
hotroddually
hotroddually is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Maple Ridge B.C. Canada
Posts: 1,242
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
we all know ford was not always good at documenting certain special made trucks.like fleet ordered trucks with abnormal powertrain,axles,etc.like the trucks special ordered by fire/rescue companies,municipale service trucks,forestry dept.,dept.of highways,military,and so forth i agree with dennis,contact ford,and see what they can tell you.
 
  #29  
Old 01-11-2007, 12:49 PM
Nighteyez's Avatar
Nighteyez
Nighteyez is offline
FTE Chapter Leader

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Fresno, CA.
Posts: 19,732
Likes: 0
Received 120 Likes on 116 Posts
Either way, I would say he has a one of a kind truck. Not too many peeps can say they have a 1/2 ton truck with 3/4 ton running gear.
 
  #30  
Old 01-11-2007, 01:12 PM
Mil1ion's Avatar
Mil1ion
Mil1ion is offline
New User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
I would still think it would make it into the shop manual regardless of how rare it was?

BUT, There isn't any mention of it whatsoever.

A prototype ? Fine.. It would still have paperwork
 

Last edited by Mil1ion; 01-11-2007 at 01:39 PM.


Quick Reply: F-130?!?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:30 PM.