Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Performance, Engines & Troubleshooting > Ford V6 > 2.6, 2.8, 2.9, 4.0 & SOHC 4.0 V6
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?


Welcome to Ford-Trucks Forums!
Welcome to Ford-Trucks.com.

You are currently viewing our forums as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Ford-Trucks Forums community today!





 
Reply
 
 
 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 12-09-2006, 11:42 AM
broke77f100 broke77f100 is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Slippery Rock, PA
Posts: 605
broke77f100 is starting off with a positive reputation.
2.9L Performance

Hey all,

I'm new to this specific engine forum(I frequently visit the 4.9L 300 section) but my brother is looking at a Bronco II that runs and drives for $150. Has a small soft spot on the frame that can be fixed with a small piece of new steel and it also has a big scratch and dent on one of the fenders. This Bronco II has a 2.9L and 5spd. What are possible performance upgrades for a 2.9L V6??? And also, if a V8 were swapped into a 2.9L V6 spot is the original 5spd still applicable to the V8 or is that only the bigger V6s? I know his 1988 Ranger has a 2.0(gas) with M5R1 and the M5R1 isnt applicable to a V6 or any motor other than the 2.0/2.3.
__________________
Charles Shirey
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-10-2006, 12:23 AM
mrshorty mrshorty is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: UT
Posts: 3,742
mrshorty is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
The 2.9 L V6 is what they call a cologne engine - the same family as the 2.8 and the 4.0. The transmission will bolt up to either of those engines. Do you know which 5 speed it has? Most likely, from what I understand, is the FM146 Mitsubishi transmission. Even though it bolts up to a 4.0, there is some debate out there as to how well it will hold up to the torque the 4.0 puts out.

From what I understand, there are some of the usual bolt on performance stuff (intake systems, exhaust systems, and the like), but nothing real dramatic. I've heard of the occasional person who gets real excited about building it up and gets the engine rebuilt for it (new cam, bore and stroke, and the like). Whether anything you can do to the 2.9 is better (or easier) than just dropping a 4.0 in, I don't know. If your brother wants to do some kind of engine swap, I would suggest trying to get the transmission with it.
__________________
'87 Bronco II XLT 4x4 & '92 Explorer XLT 4x4 & '98 Chev Suburban K1500 SLT 4x4
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-10-2006, 08:51 AM
broke77f100 broke77f100 is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Slippery Rock, PA
Posts: 605
broke77f100 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Thanks shorty thats actually a bit helpful. I think if he decides to do an engine swap I'll have to point him towards a 5.0 and T-5 and buy a shift relocator kit from that one company that I can't remember the name to.
__________________
Charles Shirey
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-10-2006, 11:31 AM
rusty70f100 rusty70f100 is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Iowa
Posts: 8,600
rusty70f100 is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.rusty70f100 is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
I suggest finding a wrecked Explorer. Pull the engine, transmission, computer and wiring. Rebuild the 4.0L. There are actually some decent performance options for the 4.0L. You can get different heads and / or pistons to get higher compression (some combinations too high for pump gas), and a couple Comp cams for it. With headers you'd have a really decent motor, that bolts up.

Of course there's nothing wrong with the 302 option. I've heard that you cant swap a 302 into a 4x4, but that may be wrong. I've also heard that with a 302, things get, um, cramped under the hood.

For the 2.9L, you could hop it up a little bit. World Products makes some heads that do flow better than the stock heads. A little porting and cleanup would help those too. The later non-EGR Rangers had a more agressive cam than the Bronco 2's, so a swap is possible there too. Find a throttle body from a 1986 or 1987 Bronco 2, as it is bigger than the one you have. Put a set of headers on and it should run good.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-10-2006, 11:37 AM
TigerDan's Avatar
TigerDan TigerDan is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: The hills of No. Calif.
Posts: 11,766
TigerDan has a superb reputationTigerDan has a superb reputationTigerDan has a superb reputationTigerDan has a superb reputationTigerDan has a superb reputationTigerDan has a superb reputationTigerDan has a superb reputationTigerDan has a superb reputationTigerDan has a superb reputationTigerDan has a superb reputationTigerDan has a superb reputation
The T-5 is about the only transmission that can be swapped in behind a V8 that will stand up to the added torque and still be able to bolt up to the stock transfer case using an adapter. It's a somewhat pricey adapter as I recall and it's available from James Duff Enterprises (among others):

http://www.jamesduff.com/broncoII/v8conversion.html

1988 was sort of a changeover year, so you possibly have one of three transmissions: the M5R1 you mentioned above, which has an integral bellhousing that is specific to the engine and was available in both 4-cylinder (2.0/2.3) and V6 (2.9/4.0) versions. Also, both the Mitsubishi FM145 and FM146 were available that year, and have a seperate removable bellhousing for either application (as well as different input shaft).

I think there are adapters availble for the V8 to these trannies, but it's rather pointless because they won't hold up to the V8 for long unless you baby it, and what's the point of swapping in a V8 if you're going to have to baby it...?

For a shift relocater I believe you can use the tailshaft and housing from an S10 4X4 which moves the shifter back into pretty much the original forward position for the Ranger/Bronco II.However, I think the BII's all had bucket seats so keeping the relocated shifter in the more rearward position still works out ok, you just have to remove or modify the center console (if you have one). I switched to buckets in my Ranger so I could keep the shifter further back, I like it there.

Alternatively, you could swap in an M5R2 from an F150 with a 4.9 or 5.0 along with the F150's transfer case. That's probably the route I'd go. Cheapest and most likely easiest.

You can also stay with EFI, the rewiring isn't too bad. I just swapped a 5.0 HO into my '89 Ranger which originally had the 2.9. There are a lot of websites with info on doing the swap, and pretty good downloadable book available from one of them. Let me know if you want some links. Got lots of pics as well.
__________________
"alot" is not a word...

Political Correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.

Last edited by TigerDan; 12-11-2006 at 05:31 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-10-2006, 09:54 PM
broke77f100 broke77f100 is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Slippery Rock, PA
Posts: 605
broke77f100 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Well, really I never said the Bronco II was an 88...I said his Ranger is an 88 with a 2.0(gas) and M5R1.
__________________
Charles Shirey
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-10-2006, 10:15 PM
TigerDan's Avatar
TigerDan TigerDan is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: The hills of No. Calif.
Posts: 11,766
TigerDan has a superb reputationTigerDan has a superb reputationTigerDan has a superb reputationTigerDan has a superb reputationTigerDan has a superb reputationTigerDan has a superb reputationTigerDan has a superb reputationTigerDan has a superb reputationTigerDan has a superb reputationTigerDan has a superb reputationTigerDan has a superb reputation
Oops, that's what happens when I read too fast and miss a detail here and there. I just saw 1988 and that's what stuck in my mind. So what year is the BII?
__________________
"alot" is not a word...

Political Correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-11-2006, 04:33 PM
broke77f100 broke77f100 is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Slippery Rock, PA
Posts: 605
broke77f100 is starting off with a positive reputation.
I'm not exactly positive on the year...my brother doesn't even know but anyway, it must be newer than 86? I believe due to the fact it has a 2.9L.
__________________
Charles Shirey
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-11-2006, 05:05 PM
TigerDan's Avatar
TigerDan TigerDan is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: The hills of No. Calif.
Posts: 11,766
TigerDan has a superb reputationTigerDan has a superb reputationTigerDan has a superb reputationTigerDan has a superb reputationTigerDan has a superb reputationTigerDan has a superb reputationTigerDan has a superb reputationTigerDan has a superb reputationTigerDan has a superb reputationTigerDan has a superb reputationTigerDan has a superb reputation
Correct, since that was the first year of the 2.9. Do you know which front-end sheet metal it has? The earlier style would make it an '86, '87 or '88 and in '89 they changed to the smoother, more aero-look front so if it has that, it would be an '89 or '90.

Click the image to open in full size.
Click the image to open in full size.
__________________
"alot" is not a word...

Political Correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-11-2006, 05:12 PM
broke77f100 broke77f100 is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Slippery Rock, PA
Posts: 605
broke77f100 is starting off with a positive reputation.
nah no idea lol
__________________
Charles Shirey
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 01-10-2007, 11:39 AM
cdncowboy's Avatar
cdncowboy cdncowboy is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Kitchener ont
Posts: 323
cdncowboy is starting off with a positive reputation.
there is actually quite a bit you can do to the 2.9l I just finished rebuilding mine from the ground up I put a set of pace setter headers on 5.0 fuel injectors (19lbs) ram air, ported and polished the intake upper and lower as well as the heads (did them my self) put the bigger throttle body on the TB from a 86-87 2.9 is larger then 88 and up about 1.5 ci bigger to be exact did a set of free flowing rockers turned it in to quite the peppy lil thing I noticed a huge diffrence I know I am forgetting a couple of other things I did but if ya wat anymore info I got it all here I can scan it in and e-mail it to you
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-10-2007, 02:25 PM
broke77f100 broke77f100 is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Slippery Rock, PA
Posts: 605
broke77f100 is starting off with a positive reputation.
the bronco II is an 89 model....he wont be able to get it until the dude finds another truck....thanks for all the help
__________________
Charles Shirey
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-10-2007, 04:34 PM
cdncowboy's Avatar
cdncowboy cdncowboy is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Kitchener ont
Posts: 323
cdncowboy is starting off with a positive reputation.
mine is a 89 as well
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-26-2007, 06:39 PM
BBF250 BBF250 is offline
Junior User
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 84
BBF250 is starting off with a positive reputation.
cdncowboy,

I'd like to know more about what you did to the 2.9. I'm a little confused about which throttle bodies are which. Did you put a cam in and if so which one? What do you mean free flowing rockers?
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 01-26-2007, 06:42 PM
broke77f100 broke77f100 is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Slippery Rock, PA
Posts: 605
broke77f100 is starting off with a positive reputation.
to me the "free flowing rockers" sound like roller rockers?
__________________
Charles Shirey
Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2007, 06:42 PM
 
 
 
Reply

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Performance, Engines & Troubleshooting > Ford V6 > 2.6, 2.8, 2.9, 4.0 & SOHC 4.0 V6

Tags
2, 29, 29l, 86, 90, bronco, cologne, compression, for, ford, swapped, swapping, tb, troubleshooting1987, truck

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
1986 Ford Aerostar with 2.9 V6? FordMan1981 Aerostar 0 08-19-2013 03:46 AM
Electric Cooling Fans from FF Dynamics or LMC Truck? truvoice1 Cooling, Heating, Ventilation & A/C 7 07-20-2013 10:57 AM
Eaton M62 on a 2.9L V6 combo NitrousAl Supercharger, Turbocharger, Nitrous Oxide & Water/Methanol Injection 0 04-15-2005 05:50 PM
New Guy here with V6 questions... John Fabris Ranger & B-Series 3 04-02-2003 08:18 AM
Swap a 2.9L to 3.0L Motor! rwahlers Bronco II 4 07-08-2002 11:55 AM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:18 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 AC1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Statement - Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. FordŽ is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.

vbulletin Admin Backup