1997 - 2003 F150 1997-2003 F150, 1997-1999 F250LD, 7700 & 2004 F150 Heritage

F150 crash test video

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 09-14-2006, 12:40 AM
ptowntsi's Avatar
ptowntsi
ptowntsi is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
F150 crash test video

I just saw this thing on YouTube. interesting results!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G17ej95Pj00

i would have thought it would be safer.
 
  #2  
Old 09-17-2006, 11:59 PM
ptowntsi's Avatar
ptowntsi
ptowntsi is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
none of you are worried about this?
 
  #3  
Old 09-18-2006, 12:17 AM
BLK94F150's Avatar
BLK94F150
BLK94F150 is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: None of your business
Posts: 3,077
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nope. As a firefighter/EMT, I have seen very few crashes of that level of destruction. You'd pretty much have to hit a very substantial building just like they did to get those results.

In a real crash you usually have two or more cars that glance off of each other. Then they spin, slide, etc, distributing the force over many smaller impacts.

While those tests are valid, they really don't relate to real world crashes. Very seldom are you secured to a track that runs you perfectly into a very solid wall, expending all of the crash energy in one impact.

Mike
 
  #4  
Old 09-18-2006, 12:32 AM
Blurry94's Avatar
Blurry94
Blurry94 is offline
Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Calhoun GA
Posts: 3,477
Likes: 0
Received 45 Likes on 35 Posts
Agreed^

Put a dodge or chevy under those same conditions and lets see that vid. If you look at the vid, the driveshaft got bent...imagine how fast you'd have to be traveling, and strike an immovable object, just right, and bend the driveshaft.
 
  #5  
Old 09-18-2006, 01:09 AM
Stryker472's Avatar
Stryker472
Stryker472 is offline
Freshman User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Smile

I dont think the crash test dummie made it out of that one lol !
 
  #6  
Old 09-18-2006, 03:59 AM
tdister's Avatar
tdister
tdister is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: central TX
Posts: 1,921
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V4SvSd5L9hA&NR

looks like the Dakota did slightly better, assuming it was the same test/speed.

I agree though, that's a serious wreck. Even just slamming on the brakes and having it nose-dive would change the outcome, even if impact speed were the same. For better or worse I don't know, but that seems a more likely scenario. Unless the driver fell asleep that is.

Even if it didn't crumple that bad, that would just mean more energy was tranferred directly to your body. Still not very confidence inpiring...

A bad situation either way, bodies just aren't meant to stop that fast.

My F150 is the same as that one. Got a Dak too, but it's an ext. cab. I'm just gonna hope that it never happens in either of them.

Seems the Chevy did the best out of the full size: http://www.iihs.org/ratings/rating.aspx?id=4

Dodge did about the same as Ford: http://www.iihs.org/ratings/rating.aspx?id=6

http://www.iihs.org/ratings/rating.aspx?id=7

Edit: it seems all of those, including the vids, were at 40 MPH...
 
  #7  
Old 09-18-2006, 01:17 PM
ptowntsi's Avatar
ptowntsi
ptowntsi is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
all those pickups are just awful in a wreck. I saw a smart-car hit a wall at 70mph that came out better than those things from ONLY 40mph!! look up "smart car crash" on you tube.
 
  #8  
Old 09-18-2006, 01:18 PM
ptowntsi's Avatar
ptowntsi
ptowntsi is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
  #9  
Old 09-18-2006, 01:23 PM
ptowntsi's Avatar
ptowntsi
ptowntsi is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
lmao

"Major collapse of the occupant compartment left little survival space for the driver."
 
  #10  
Old 09-18-2006, 01:28 PM
ptowntsi's Avatar
ptowntsi
ptowntsi is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
an old jeep grand cherokee took it like a pro
 
  #11  
Old 09-18-2006, 01:35 PM
BLK94F150's Avatar
BLK94F150
BLK94F150 is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: None of your business
Posts: 3,077
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ptowntsi
all those pickups are just awful in a wreck. I saw a smart-car hit a wall at 70mph that came out better than those things from ONLY 40mph!! look up "smart car crash" on you tube.
Yay!

So the car is ok. There is still a good change that you'd be dead. You see in every crash there are actually 3 crashes. The initial crash, you body crashing into a seat belt, dashboard, steering wheel, etc, and then your organs crashing into the inside of your body.

So even if the car looks ok, everything may not be so. For example, your heart (which is pretty much only held in place by the aortic arch) may sever that artery and you're dead.

Crash tests do nothing but compare different vehicles on a similar test. They have very little real world relevance. But I see that you're stuck on them, so whatever. I guess the F150 sucks at the offset frontal crash test. Who cares?

Mike
 
  #12  
Old 09-18-2006, 01:47 PM
ptowntsi's Avatar
ptowntsi
ptowntsi is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
because I used to drive a lincoln navigator, which would probably fare similiar to the f150 and it really disturbs me.
 
  #13  
Old 09-18-2006, 01:59 PM
BLK94F150's Avatar
BLK94F150
BLK94F150 is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: None of your business
Posts: 3,077
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Based on real life experience, it probably wouldn't have. Like I've said time and time again, crash tests do not relate to real life well.

Mike
 
  #14  
Old 09-18-2006, 02:00 PM
captain p4's Avatar
captain p4
captain p4 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Joppa, Maryland
Posts: 8,147
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Yeah, these trucks, especially the 97-03 were terrible at this. Look up the toyota tundra results, the cab portion stays basically intack. You want the rest of the truck to crumple up, but not the part that you're in! Thats why they have those commercials claiming how safe the new f150 was, they obviously knew it was a problem with those to make such a big deal out of it with the new ones.
 
  #15  
Old 09-18-2006, 02:17 PM
'88_F-150's Avatar
'88_F-150
'88_F-150 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Pittstown NJ
Posts: 242
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
considering my truck weighs more than most cars on the road and i dont have much of a chance of hitting a solid wall without hitting the brakes i couldnt care less about these crash tests they should crash different sized cars together and see what happens...

-Rich
 


Quick Reply: F150 crash test video



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:18 PM.