You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!
it will never be available in the US, trust me. The epa is more interested in stupid little minor non issue increases in reductions in tailpipe emissions than they are in fuel economy. The current diesel emissions requirements would kill that car instantly here. The 07 emissions requirements are going to add $6-10,000 to the cost of a diesel pickup on top of the already added price for the diesel to begin with and the epa doesn't care that they are trying to kill an engine that is between 30-80% more efficient than it's gas counter part and without emissions equipment is cleaner than even the smogged versions of the gassers. they are one of the major reasons we can't get away from foriegn oil.
No those claims aren't out of range my parents have a VW diesel jetta that gets around 57mpg now so I don't see why it would be that hard to bring that number up pretty easily.
__________________
Rob
Learn from your parents mistakes.......... Use birth control
That is very possible, although if oil prices go up high enough ($150 - $200, which I think is exceedingly unlikely in the near future) that might change the attitude of regulators.
Quote:
The epa is more interested in stupid little minor non issue increases in reductions in tailpipe emissions than they are in fuel economy.
That is true, and it's very sad. I can understand that a clean burning engine is good to have, but with the upcoming requirements, I think the EPA went too far, and over the edge. What we'd need is a good compromise between tailpipe emission and efficiency, but the latter one appears to be sacrified for the former. While a less efficient, but "cleaner" (by EPA standards) engine will produce less NOx, CO, and unburned HC, it will produce more CO2, which isn't very good either.
VW won't expect to have diesels in 2007 model year in the US because they can't meet the requirements, yet their diesel cars are just fine in the much more densely populated Europe!!
In any case, if CA wants their own standard let them have it, but don't force everyone else.
Quote:
No those claims aren't out of range my parents have a VW diesel jetta that gets around 57mpg now so I don't see why it would be that hard to bring that number up pretty easily.
One of my point was that this approach can conceivably lead to a car with an ungodly good mpg. But even if it only gets, say, 100 mpg, that would still be at least 2x better than what the majority of cars in the US are getting today.
Well, the 50 hp version would be more acceptable here, though that's nowhere near to the other one's mpg. And they would need to have an optional automatic available in the US, which adds weight and complexity.
When was the last time a 50hp automoble was sold in volume in the US, 20+ years ago? The 53hp VW I drove in the early 1970's topped out at 80mph and had no luxuries except a sunroof, radio and sort of a heater/defroster. Americans will bitch about the price of fuel, but wont buy "economy" cars with less than 100hp and power everything, at least at these fuel prices.
Also, it's not just HP, but HP to weight ratio that determines how quickly one can accelerate. 50 HP in such a lightweight car is actually pretty reasonable.
Yes hp to weight and USABLE hp. That 53hp was at 3600rpm, and it could run there for hours at a time, not the screaming 6500rpm that is typical peak for todays typical 130hp 4-cylinder engine. Curb wieghts have grown significantly as "small" cars have grown. A typcially equipped Focus probably has 1000lbs on that VW.
When was the last time a 50hp automoble was sold in volume in the US, 20+ years ago? The 53hp VW I drove in the early 1970's topped out at 80mph and had no luxuries except a sunroof, radio and sort of a heater/defroster. Americans will bitch about the price of fuel, but wont buy "economy" cars with less than 100hp and power everything, at least at these fuel prices.
Jim
my 3 cyl 1994 Geo Metro got over 56 mpg
__________________ 1987 Ranger XLT Supercab 2.9L V6, ATX FTE Virginia Chapter Member Mike's Gallery
Hey, I liked my little 68 VW, -but then it wasn't stock, it wasn't 53HP either, and it got better MPG than stock because it had a magic "orange" distributor and carb system I built for it. It would flat roast the tires. It was also lighter than stock.
BTW- The so called heater/defroster sucked... I could R&R the engine in 30 minutes flat. I still have that engine.
__________________
"Beam me up Scotty. There's no intelligent life down here..."
It will not pass north american requirements for 600lbs of additional safety equipment to keep us from hurting ourselves. North Americans have become so used to having the government regulate safety to them, that it's amazing we are still allowed to walk on the sidewalk merely wearing shoes.
A miracle, how the generations before us ever survived not having shoulder/seat bealts, airbags etc etc..
I am in wonder that I am still around after all the trips I spent sleeping in the back of my parent's Rambler wagon.. laying down!
Today they would lock up my parents and throw away the key...
and heaven only knows how I survived riding a bicycle without a helmet... I guess the trick was to not smash your head on the pavement when riding...
But kids find a way around this. Sliding a skateboard down a railing on a long set of concrete stairs, far exceeds anything I ever did for danger. Just make sure you have you helmet on when you ride your bike home..
I remember when that cartoon came out, that would mean i'm getting old.
I went thru a CHP Motorcycle Safety course in 69, passed all classroom work and tests, following saturday did the closed road test, I passed. With that all done the CHP did a demonstration on how fast they could do a lap on a Harley. I did it drifting the 810 Dunstall Norton with some front wheel air time.
Pissed 'em off as dad was there laughing at the Harleys. He rode for 64 years.
To commute in traffic on a bike is nuts, bike riding is for pleasure away from cagers.
.....=o&o>.....
To stay alive and well riding a motorcycle in traffic, you have to ride with the presumption that you are completely invisible to other vehicle's drivers.
__________________ Bruce
corporations are not persons. corporations are not persons. corporations are not persons.corporations are not persons. corporations are not persons. corporations are not persons.
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. FordŽ is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.
