Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > General > Ford vs The Competition
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?


Ford vs The Competition Technical discussion and comparison ONLY. Trolls will not be tolerated.

Welcome to Ford-Trucks Forums!
Welcome to Ford-Trucks.com.

You are currently viewing our forums as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Ford-Trucks Forums community today!





 
Reply
 
 
 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 03-03-2006, 08:15 PM
mschultz mschultz is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 410
mschultz is starting off with a positive reputation.
Cummins Problems & G56 6 speed problems

You know, after all the hand-wringing on this site about issues with the 03-early '04 6.0 liter Powerstrokes, a lot of people act like the Cummins is a trouble-free motor. But after spending some time on the TDR site, I see that there are a lot of fuel pump, and "tapping noise" problems with the Cummins engine and gear rattle problems with the D-C 6 speed manual transmission. I wonder how all of those high-pressure external fuel lines are going to hold up over time...


Sort of puts things in perspective...


-Mike
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-03-2006, 08:26 PM
92f150I6's Avatar
92f150I6 92f150I6 is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: PA
Posts: 1,605
92f150I6 is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Hmmm........... tapping noises, fuel pump problems......vs. engine failure, lemon law buy backs
__________________
2003 F250 SD 4X4 5.4L 4:10 Arizona Beige
1987 Mustang GT (sold)
09 Challenger RT
07 BMW 328Xi E92
A bunch of motorcycles and a Quad.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-03-2006, 08:39 PM
Kep4's Avatar
Kep4 Kep4 is offline
Jäger
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: LA/OC, Kalifornia
Posts: 5,482
Kep4 has a spectacular reputation.Kep4 has a spectacular reputation.Kep4 has a spectacular reputation.Kep4 has a spectacular reputation.Kep4 has a spectacular reputation.Kep4 has a spectacular reputation.Kep4 has a spectacular reputation.Kep4 has a spectacular reputation.Kep4 has a spectacular reputation.Kep4 has a spectacular reputation.Kep4 has a spectacular reputation.
Hey Mike,
When I was researching Diesel trucks in 04 (Ford and Dodge) the main Cummins issue was a dowel pin in the front part of the '01-'02 engine block that would work it's way out and destroy the engine. No DC recall on that! They were also going round and round about the mileage decrease from the 555 engine to the 605/610 engines. I recall endless mileage threads... hmmmmmmmmm.

On edit, I forgot the automatic trans failures, vibrating driveshafts, 5-speed manual with the 5th gear nut that backed itself out and shredded the tranny, engine oil vent run in front of the radiator that sprayed oil onto the front of the radiator which then caked with dirt.
__________________
Russ
'12 F350 Lariat CCLB 4x4 6.7
'13 Fuzion 315 5th wheel
'05 F250 Lariat CCSB 4X4 6.0 - Sold

Rest In Peace, Steve P. You are missed.

Last edited by Kep4; 03-03-2006 at 08:47 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-03-2006, 09:05 PM
mschultz mschultz is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 410
mschultz is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 92f150I6
Hmmm........... tapping noises, fuel pump problems......vs. engine failure, lemon law buy backs
Good point.

But I wasn't suggesting that the 03-04 motor didnot have issues. I was merely bringing to light that issues are not unique to the 03-04 6.0 motors.

-Mike
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-03-2006, 11:15 PM
Galizien's Avatar
Galizien Galizien is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 286
Galizien is starting off with a positive reputation.
Sooo... are you saying Cummins Track record is false? or the Powerstroke has equal or less problems per 100 as the Cummins?

What are you actually saying?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-04-2006, 12:10 AM
BigF350 BigF350 is offline
Internet Brands
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Santa Monica, CA
Posts: 18,528
BigF350 has a superb reputationBigF350 has a superb reputationBigF350 has a superb reputationBigF350 has a superb reputationBigF350 has a superb reputationBigF350 has a superb reputationBigF350 has a superb reputationBigF350 has a superb reputationBigF350 has a superb reputationBigF350 has a superb reputationBigF350 has a superb reputation
adrian.erks.harris adrianerksharris
Quote:
Originally Posted by 92f150I6
Hmmm........... tapping noises, fuel pump problems......vs. engine failure, lemon law buy backs
As someone who is quite familiar with the 6.0l - few actually had "engine failure" and didn't drive.
Most were drivability issues, puking coolant, oil leaks etc.
__________________
Adrian | 2005 4x4 Diesel Courier CrewCab in Aus | 2012 4x4 CC/SB F250 6.7 in the US
2000 4x4 SC/LB F350 7.3 ZF-6 (sold)
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-04-2006, 12:18 AM
AlfredB1979 AlfredB1979 is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Alvin, Texas.
Posts: 1,978
AlfredB1979 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kepler4
Hey Mike,
They were also going round and round about the mileage decrease from the 555 engine to the 605/610 engines. I recall endless mileage threads... hmmmmmmmmm.
You're kidding me? From what I've always heard from our diesel forum visitors, the Cummins GAINS MPGs when fuel prices go up.

From what some guys here say, the Cummins averages 25 MPG minimum or so when diesel gets closer to $3/gal....

Who'd a thunk it?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-04-2006, 01:25 AM
mschultz mschultz is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 410
mschultz is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Galizien
Sooo... are you saying Cummins Track record is false? or the Powerstroke has equal or less problems per 100 as the Cummins?

What are you actually saying?
Easy there tough guy-

I'm actually saying that while it may at times feel as though only the 6.0 had problems, the fact of the matter is that the Cummins also has some problems.

The "problems per 100" is not something I raised but seems to be something you are trying to ascribe to me. Considering that I doubt either one of us has access to accurate numbers, we have no way of knowing which has fewer reported problems. And even if we did, differences in use and application would make a comparison difficult- i.e., PSD applications in different Ford GVW ranges than D-C, different ratios of trucks working at capacity versus trucks turned into buggies, ratio of trucks modified versus stock. All of the above would affect engine lifespan within the same product and make comparision difficult.

I suspect the best way to compare engines is when both are in the same application in the same fleet. We run both engines, but from different years and in different applications.

That said, the question of which is "best" is not something I am interested in debating. If we start that, some guy will chime in about how his 6.2 GM is the best pulling, most reliable, most efficient and best looking engine ever.

My point is that none of these engines are trouble free and while many folks have been down on 6.0, the competition's engines and drivetrain seem to have their share of problems as well.

For those of us who want to buy new trucks before Tier II comes in, it is important to remember that while we read all about International's '03-'04 6.0 problems here, we can easily forget that the Cummins engine and the new Mercedes G65 have their share of problems as well. Those problems combined with my desire to support the Ford workers in US plants rather than the out-of-country Daimler workers makes the decision between trucks easy for me.

-Mike

PS: Thanks Galizien for covering my back on that other thread. Those guys were fierce!

Last edited by mschultz; 03-04-2006 at 01:46 AM. Reason: second thought
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-04-2006, 02:03 AM
Galizien's Avatar
Galizien Galizien is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 286
Galizien is starting off with a positive reputation.
lol no prob,

BTW, I was not trying to be rude, actually I was really wondering what exactly what you were getting at, your thread start post was a bit vague. Tis all.

I think I am just used to a more lax rougher messege board (www.genmay.net ) as "some" *cough*bronco*cough* others seem to not be able to handle a tough debate without breaking down.

Last edited by Galizien; 03-04-2006 at 02:06 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-05-2006, 08:02 PM
fordxfour87 fordxfour87 is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 313
fordxfour87 is starting off with a positive reputation.
yeh, i know that bronco II noob person...he was really breaking down, what a loser
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 03-06-2006, 04:26 AM
NickFordMan's Avatar
NickFordMan NickFordMan is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Prince George, BC
Posts: 2,221
NickFordMan is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
What other thread?
__________________
Built Ford Tough
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-06-2006, 03:51 PM
fordxfour87 fordxfour87 is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 313
fordxfour87 is starting off with a positive reputation.
well i changed my name from bronco II noob to this, i was just playing around.....but ne way, long story short, i got into an arguement with galizenin in some other troll thread.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-06-2006, 06:03 PM
Jerme Jerme is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Oregon
Posts: 136
Jerme is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by NickFordMan
What other thread?
The dodge challenger thread I think, or one of the locked ones.

As far as the cummins/powerstroke debate, how long has the 5.9 been out for cummins perfect (or improve on) and how long has the 6.0 powerstroke been out? Imagine if ford was able to continue evolving the 7.3 like cummins has for so long.
Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2006, 06:03 PM
 
 
 
Reply

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
390 T56 powertrain route Stephen67 1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks 21 01-14-2012 09:47 PM
PSD or Cummins Fifty4F100 General Diesel Discussion 203 11-17-2007 03:07 PM
I found this on another website blub 6.0L Power Stroke Diesel 6 11-22-2006 02:27 AM
Dodge Cummins Talking about 6.0PSD hontechs 6.0L Power Stroke Diesel 35 01-25-2005 12:16 AM
Some general questions about diesels Ford's and others. Todder 6.0L Power Stroke Diesel 2 10-07-2004 07:57 PM


Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > General > Ford vs The Competition

Tags
2003, 2007, 6speed, cummins, cvd, dodge, g56, manual, mercedes, problems, ratios, reunel, specifications, specs, speed, transmission

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 AC1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Statement - Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. FordŽ is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.

vbulletin Admin Backup