Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > General > Ford vs The Competition
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?


Ford vs The Competition Technical discussion and comparison ONLY. Trolls will not be tolerated.

Reply
 
 
 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 02-16-2006, 06:38 AM
95250mac 95250mac is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: New England
Posts: 119
95250mac is starting off with a positive reputation.
Tahoe going to save Chevrolet?

What do you think about the 2007 Chevrolet Tahoe?

Some say better others say worse, it does have the jump on the Expedition as far as release dates, Ford will not be out untill Fall of 2006.

What I can't understand is why it is still so small.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-16-2006, 10:06 AM
osbornk osbornk is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Marion, VA
Posts: 2,511
osbornk is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.osbornk is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
I think initial sales will be pretty good because the current version looked the same for so long. The dedicated owners of the current version have been waiting so their new vehicle wouldn't look just like the one they currently have. I'm sure it will be vastly better than the old one because of the long run of the old one and the market has gotten far more competative due to the entrance of large SUVs from foreign brands. In the long run, I think the entire large SUV market is going to shrink dramatically. It was the family tow vehicle for years but 4 door large trucks are taking that market.
__________________
2004 XLT Regular Cab, Short Bed, 4X4 with 5.4 and 3.73.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-16-2006, 11:28 AM
john112deere's Avatar
john112deere john112deere is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Maine
Posts: 1,651
john112deere is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
The Tahoe as been a good truck for quite a while, but with a few little annoyances, like an interior that looked like it came from a Kia, and a brake pedal that felt like it was going to go to the floor every time you stepped on it. They've fixed both of those problems in the new one, so I'd wager it is now an excellent truck.

As for the size, it is small because it slots BELOW the Suburban in the Chevy marketing scheme. If potential buyers think the Tahoe is too small, then they can step up to the Suburban, which is just a bigger Tahoe. If, however, the Tahoe were to grow, then Chevy might lose customers who don't want anything bigger than the Tahoe, but do want bigger than the Trailblazer.

I for one, think that the whole big SUV, family 4-door pickup market is going to shrink in the next few years, once people realize that gas prices are probably going to stay above $2 into the forseeable future (as every source I've read says) and lots of them don't need vehicles that big. (Who knows, they might even realize that smaller cars are easier to park and handle better...)
__________________
1997 Ranger XLT supercab flareside
2.3L 4-cyl, 4x2, 5-speed manual, 232k miles
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-16-2006, 01:33 PM
jdmorg jdmorg is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: just outside of Phila.
Posts: 1,371
jdmorg is starting off with a positive reputation.
I hope it does really well for the sake of GM. As for the Tahoe's though, my parents have a 98...what a piece! I sure hope they got their act together if for nothing else to keep an American auto-manufacturer from going down.
__________________
John
1988 Bronco
302EFI 4x4

Mods:
New 302
Dashboard Hula Dancer
Wax
Driver side door dent
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-16-2006, 01:33 PM
4wd 4wd is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: SW Iowa
Posts: 735
4wd is starting off with a positive reputation.
The local chevy dealer has had one parked out front for about month. A pretty black LS pkg. Hasn't moved an inch. Maybe sticker shock---North of 40k!
__________________
'05 F-350 4x4, V-10, 6spd, 4.30 LS, 18" rubber;
Farming; TRADED FOR A '12 RAM 2500 Cummins, 4x4, 6spd, 3.70 posi, 17" rubber and It's great so far!
SW Iowa
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-16-2006, 03:05 PM
polarbear's Avatar
polarbear polarbear is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Damascus-Boring, Ore
Posts: 10,729
polarbear is a splendid one to beholdpolarbear is a splendid one to beholdpolarbear is a splendid one to beholdpolarbear is a splendid one to beholdpolarbear is a splendid one to beholdpolarbear is a splendid one to beholdpolarbear is a splendid one to behold
4wd The local chevy dealer has had one parked out front for about month. A pretty black LS pkg. Hasn't moved an inch. Maybe sticker shock---North of 40k!

The reason he's still got it is "Black LS." If it was a Black LTZ with a $53,000 sticker, it'd be long gone. This is a wierd market- the lower-equipment levels are saleproof, the loaded stuff flies out the door.

95250mac What do you think about the 2007 Chevrolet Tahoe?

Some say better others say worse, it does have the jump on the Expedition as far as release dates, Ford will not be out untill Fall of 2006.

What I can't understand is why it is still so small.


Define "small." It's about 10" shorter than a Suburban, but was styled to look smaller than it is. This is a product GM does well- they understand the buyer, which is the biggest factor in their 60% market share in full-size SUV's. It's not any bigger because the affluent soccer moms that drive these things like the size- especially the low height. If it sacrifices ground clearance- tough. Most of them never see anything taller than a speed bump to clear anyway.

Will the Tahoe save GM? No, the GMT900 (new Silverado) has that role- the Tahoe's just the supporting cast.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-16-2006, 03:23 PM
Thomasm67's Avatar
Thomasm67 Thomasm67 is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 2,986
Thomasm67 is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
It looks nice but i don't like the remote power back door and the power fold seats yes for some it is a conviences but to much can and will go wrong with all those nifty power conviences. Then they are an inconvience.
__________________
76 Hiboy

Resident HillBilly
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-16-2006, 04:03 PM
msalyer msalyer is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 407
msalyer is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.msalyer is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
I really like it and I am considering buying one in about a year. The gas mileage rating is nice.

Polar, I must be weird but the only options I want are a 3 passenger third seat and luggage "slats" on the roof. Everything else I "must" have is standard equipment.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-16-2006, 04:14 PM
StillaKilla187 StillaKilla187 is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 193
StillaKilla187 is starting off with a positive reputation.
The new tahoe is pretty cool, and willprob sellgood because the old one was around for such a long time.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-16-2006, 06:58 PM
AlfredB1979 AlfredB1979 is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Alvin, Texas.
Posts: 1,978
AlfredB1979 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Ooof.

Base prices are in the high 30K ranger and options toss that figure into the 50's....

I doubt that appeals to a huge bunch of the consumer these days, who have been cutting back on the excess of the 90s these days.

Hybrid for 2008 seems interesting, moreso than 15c/21h MPG ratings. If those are the granny EPA figures, maybe the actual figures over time come close with the cylinder deactivation.

I would have really been excited if GM halved a Duramax and lobbed in a 3.3L I4 or thereabouts.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 02-16-2006, 09:35 PM
mschultz mschultz is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 410
mschultz is starting off with a positive reputation.
Nice Interior- for GM.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 02-16-2006, 10:55 PM
73Fastbackv10's Avatar
73Fastbackv10 73Fastbackv10 is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Orange
Posts: 946
73Fastbackv10 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by msalyer
I really like it and I am considering buying one in about a year. The gas mileage rating is nice.
The keyword there is "rating". One car mag, either Car and Driver or Motor Trend, got a cool 13 observed mpgs.
__________________
2002 Ford Excursion XLT
7.3L PSD, MBRP 4" turbo back exhaust with 5" tip, Bully intake, 6" lift, Bilstein shocks, drilled and slotted brake rotors, billet grille

2006 Mustang GT
4.6L 3V, 40 series Flowmasters, smoked turn signals
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 02-17-2006, 12:28 AM
polarbear's Avatar
polarbear polarbear is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Damascus-Boring, Ore
Posts: 10,729
polarbear is a splendid one to beholdpolarbear is a splendid one to beholdpolarbear is a splendid one to beholdpolarbear is a splendid one to beholdpolarbear is a splendid one to beholdpolarbear is a splendid one to beholdpolarbear is a splendid one to behold
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlfredB1979
Ooof.

Base prices are in the high 30K ranger and options toss that figure into the 50's....

I doubt that appeals to a huge bunch of the consumer these days, who have been cutting back on the excess of the 90s these days.

Hybrid for 2008 seems interesting, moreso than 15c/21h MPG ratings. If those are the granny EPA figures, maybe the actual figures over time come close with the cylinder deactivation.

I would have really been excited if GM halved a Duramax and lobbed in a 3.3L I4 or thereabouts.
I'm going to say this delicately....... have you lost your mind?

In a Ford store, in a logging/farming town of 4500 people, the average new transaction price is over $40,000. A rural Ford store, mind you- not a Lexus store. Mercedes sales are up over 15% from last year. BMW kicked over 100,000 3-series out the door last year. To put that into perspective, the little Bimmer outsold the 500.

The softest part of the truck market is the compact sector- it keeps shrinking in total numbers, even though the price of fuel increases. Why? Simple- those that can afford a new car or truck can really afford one, while those on the margins (eg, the entry level markets) are being pushed into used. It's not a healthy thing, mind you- but it's fact.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 02-17-2006, 07:42 AM
msalyer msalyer is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 407
msalyer is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.msalyer is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 73Fastbackv10
The keyword there is "rating". One car mag, either Car and Driver or Motor Trend, got a cool 13 observed mpgs.
True that, but I bet they could take my 2001 F250 SD SC 4x4 and get LESS than 13.
That's why I am not jumping right now. I'll give it a little time to get out on the streets and see what owners are saying. I really don't put a lot of faith in those "pro import" rags.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 02-17-2006, 11:27 AM
73Fastbackv10's Avatar
73Fastbackv10 73Fastbackv10 is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Orange
Posts: 946
73Fastbackv10 is starting off with a positive reputation.
A 4x4 super duty better get worse gas mileage than a Tahoe, or else Chevy totatally messed up.
__________________
2002 Ford Excursion XLT
7.3L PSD, MBRP 4" turbo back exhaust with 5" tip, Bully intake, 6" lift, Bilstein shocks, drilled and slotted brake rotors, billet grille

2006 Mustang GT
4.6L 3V, 40 series Flowmasters, smoked turn signals
Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2006, 11:27 AM
 
 
 
Reply

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Thanks NumberDummy JRB65 1961 - 1963 F100 Unibody 2 07-16-2009 01:18 PM
I'm putting on a 5 inch body lift chrono4 Offroad & 4x4 29 11-06-2006 12:53 AM
Ford merges with Chevrolet...... SuperBlue General Automotive Discussion 18 09-28-2006 07:54 PM
Chevys new Yukon/excursion RickDill1 General Automotive Discussion 9 01-05-2006 09:42 PM
Pictures of the '07 Tahoe Elwood Blues Ford vs The Competition 29 08-27-2005 06:32 PM


Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > General > Ford vs The Competition

Tags
bigger, tahoe, truck

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump


Participate In The Forums

Create new posts and participate in discussions. It's free!

Sign Up »





All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 AC1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Statement - Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.

vbulletin Admin Backup