Is a 95 F150 302 MAF or Speed Density?
#1
Is a 95 F150 302 MAF or Speed Density?
Hey Guys,
I might be able to pick up a 95 F150 4x4 SCAB 302 with auto tranny for about $4K.
I'm more familiar with the old 300 I-6's and the newer Modular engines so I want to know if the 95 302's are MAF or Speed Density fuel systems?
If I get this truck I might do a rebuild with some minor improvements, but I'll need to know about the MAF/SD issue first. MAF is a bit easier to deal with upgrades.
Also, what an average cost for mostly stock rebuild?
Thanks for any help.
CMOS
I might be able to pick up a 95 F150 4x4 SCAB 302 with auto tranny for about $4K.
I'm more familiar with the old 300 I-6's and the newer Modular engines so I want to know if the 95 302's are MAF or Speed Density fuel systems?
If I get this truck I might do a rebuild with some minor improvements, but I'll need to know about the MAF/SD issue first. MAF is a bit easier to deal with upgrades.
Also, what an average cost for mostly stock rebuild?
Thanks for any help.
CMOS
#2
#4
Blurry,
Not sure it does need a rebuild. I'm going to look at it this Saturday. It has 125K miles. I'm just in a position ($) that if I want to do the rebuild, I can.
If I do so, I'll change the CAM to a good low-torque model and do some decent valve work. Not too much beyond that. Will probably do some exhaust work too but I'll need to stay within the emission parameters to pass inspection.
Thanks for the replies. Other info I read also confirms that the 95 should be an MAF system.
In general, is there a mileage range in which the 302 typically needs some rebuild work?
CMOS
Not sure it does need a rebuild. I'm going to look at it this Saturday. It has 125K miles. I'm just in a position ($) that if I want to do the rebuild, I can.
If I do so, I'll change the CAM to a good low-torque model and do some decent valve work. Not too much beyond that. Will probably do some exhaust work too but I'll need to stay within the emission parameters to pass inspection.
Thanks for the replies. Other info I read also confirms that the 95 should be an MAF system.
In general, is there a mileage range in which the 302 typically needs some rebuild work?
CMOS
#5
Originally Posted by CMOS
Blurry,
Not sure it does need a rebuild. I'm going to look at it this Saturday. It has 125K miles. I'm just in a position ($) that if I want to do the rebuild, I can.
If I do so, I'll change the CAM to a good low-torque model and do some decent valve work. Not too much beyond that. Will probably do some exhaust work too but I'll need to stay within the emission parameters to pass inspection.
Thanks for the replies. Other info I read also confirms that the 95 should be an MAF system.
In general, is there a mileage range in which the 302 typically needs some rebuild work?
CMOS
Not sure it does need a rebuild. I'm going to look at it this Saturday. It has 125K miles. I'm just in a position ($) that if I want to do the rebuild, I can.
If I do so, I'll change the CAM to a good low-torque model and do some decent valve work. Not too much beyond that. Will probably do some exhaust work too but I'll need to stay within the emission parameters to pass inspection.
Thanks for the replies. Other info I read also confirms that the 95 should be an MAF system.
In general, is there a mileage range in which the 302 typically needs some rebuild work?
CMOS
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
steverinaz
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
2
01-24-2017 12:08 AM
RAY1986F150
1980 - 1986 Bullnose F100, F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
60
06-22-2011 12:11 PM
Reed
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
15
06-16-2009 11:00 PM
mattri
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
5
08-20-2008 11:52 PM