1983 - 2012 Ranger & B-Series All Ford Ranger and Mazda B-Series models

2004 2.3L Ranger performance?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 11-03-2005, 11:24 AM
MikeUB's Avatar
MikeUB
MikeUB is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2004 2.3L Ranger performance?

Hi, i was looking into buying performance parts for my 2004 2.3L Ranger 2x4. I'm having trouble finding anything at all, short of a Cold Air Intake made by Draxas Performance.

If anyone has some information on where i could get parts or any ideas how well the draxas intake works it would be much appreciated. Thx, Mike.
 
  #2  
Old 11-03-2005, 12:59 PM
Cheech5o's Avatar
Cheech5o
Cheech5o is offline
Junior User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What kind of parts are you looking for?
Do you want new parts? or doesnt matter?
 
  #3  
Old 11-03-2005, 02:13 PM
RangerPilot's Avatar
RangerPilot
RangerPilot is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Durant, OK (SOSU)
Posts: 8,462
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Well, first things first. It's a 2.3, don't expect it to stand on the back wheels...ever...lol. But honestly, you can find some stuff out there. The "cold" air intake is a good place to start, if you are seriously looking to invest money into it.
You don't mention if you have an auto or manual tranny. If it's a manual, definetly look into the very popular Hurst shifters, not bad and much quicker on the shifts once you get used to it.
You could look at local muffler shops and see what they could do for you.
Those are fairly simple and inexpensive mods you can do. None is going to give a huge boost of performance, but they'll make it easier on you and maybe run a little better.
If you really want performance, turbo it, upgrade the diff, and get a chip for it.
 
  #4  
Old 11-04-2005, 06:52 AM
BigBlue88's Avatar
BigBlue88
BigBlue88 is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Northern Virginia, USA
Posts: 911
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Yeah, there's not really much stuff out there for the Ranger motor. If you wanted to get creative, it's the same basic motor as the 2.3L Duratec Focus. Draxas is about the only source of parts for the Duratec Ranger I could find.

If you're going to get agressive with your manual tranny, I'd recommend you upgrade the clutch.

I put a cat-back on my 2003 and saw an improvement, especially in the top-end. Fun little truck in traffic. Still have to downshift to go up hills, though.
 
  #5  
Old 11-04-2005, 08:42 AM
BarnieTrk's Avatar
BarnieTrk
BarnieTrk is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Stanton, Michigan, USA
Posts: 2,017
Received 56 Likes on 49 Posts
Originally Posted by RangerPilot
... upgrade the diff, and get a chip for it.
RangerPilot,

What differential upgrades would you recommend?
-- tear out the 7.5" ring/pinion housing and install a 8.8" unit?
-- take out the open diff and install a limited slip?
-- change out (numerically) the ring/pinion gears?
-- all of the above?


What and who's "chip" would you suggest?

Thanks!
BarnieTrk
 
  #6  
Old 11-04-2005, 08:46 PM
Ken00's Avatar
Ken00
Ken00 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 10,562
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Only switch in an 8.8 if your worried about breaking the 7.5.

A posi will help if your having traction issues.

A lower gear will improve acceleration but you'll lose mileage and top end speed.

Check out our site sponser motorhaven.com and our chip forum.
 
  #7  
Old 11-04-2005, 08:57 PM
BigBlue88's Avatar
BigBlue88
BigBlue88 is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Northern Virginia, USA
Posts: 911
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I recall that the only chip available for the 2.3 Duratec Ranger is a custom-burn Diablo chip, available through Draxas. I've always wondered if Focus parts could be used. You might have to use the throttle body and sensors from a Focus, but it's the same basic engine, and there's lots of stuff available for the Focus.

I've yet to mod my intake, but I just might.

Do mods affect warranty service? Could Ford/Mazda deny me warranty coverage because I have a cat-back exhaust?
 
  #8  
Old 11-04-2005, 09:11 PM
Ken00's Avatar
Ken00
Ken00 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 10,562
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Check out this link, it applies to your warrant question....

http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/conline/pubs/...s/warranty.htm

Bottom line it will only affect the warranty if it has a direct relationship to the failure, such as a drive line failure after you install a 6" lift.
 
  #9  
Old 11-05-2005, 12:38 AM
RangerPilot's Avatar
RangerPilot
RangerPilot is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Durant, OK (SOSU)
Posts: 8,462
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
No personal suggestions, the stock differential would be fine. That being said, treat it well, keep the fluid changed (as I found out today, mine has NEVER been changed).
Ken, you say a lower gear would increase acceleration but decrease top speed/mileage. So my 3.08 would accelerate faster than a 3.73, but I'm gettin' ripped on speed and mileage?
 
  #10  
Old 11-05-2005, 08:16 AM
jbau's Avatar
jbau
jbau is offline
Senior User
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Sunny New Mexico
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'd think twice about doing business with Draxas. I bought a header for my 2.3 from them and it has been the most unprofessional, frustrating transaction I've ever had. It's still unresolved after nearly three months. PM me and I'll send you a link to a different forum where some of it is detailed.
 
  #11  
Old 11-05-2005, 11:30 AM
BarnieTrk's Avatar
BarnieTrk
BarnieTrk is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Stanton, Michigan, USA
Posts: 2,017
Received 56 Likes on 49 Posts
Originally Posted by RangerPilot
So my 3.08 would accelerate faster than a 3.73, but I'm gettin' ripped on speed and mileage?
I'm not Ken00, but I'll jump in here:
It's my understanding that the 3.73 ring/pinion gears would accelerate you quicker than the 3.08 gears, due to the 1st gear & ring/pinion gear multiplication. However, the upper rpm power range would also be obtained quicker with the 3.73s and result in a lower top mph speed than the 3.08s. However, unless you're into driving well over 70mph, it likely wouldn't be a problem.

I have been thinking of locating a good used 7.5", 3.73 limited-slip ring/pinion gear set out of a Bronco II or 4X4 Ranger for my 2X4, '94, 2.3L, 5-speed Ranger. Since I've got the 5-speed, which I think has about an 0.80 OD (5th) gear, that would only compute to a 2.98 ratio (3.73 X 0.80) final drive ratio. Then considering 27" tall tires @ 65 mph, that would still only make just over 2400rpms; which is still not that high for decent mileage.

Regarding a different computer chip, I'm a bit scared to go with one, since I've my 2.3L has fairly high mileage (>240K) on it and I'd be afraid I'd hurt it...

BarnieTrk

P.S.
When I asked to buy a K&N air filter for my 2.3L Ranger, the counter/salesman asked me, "WHY?" I responded, "Because it needs all the help it can get!"
 
  #12  
Old 11-05-2005, 01:18 PM
RangerPilot's Avatar
RangerPilot
RangerPilot is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Durant, OK (SOSU)
Posts: 8,462
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
.87 for 5th (OD) as far as I know.

I am lookin' into getting a 3.73 as well then. Even though it accelerates just fine in my opinion and can move when I want it to, always fun to throw something out they don't expect!
 
  #13  
Old 11-05-2005, 04:49 PM
BarnieTrk's Avatar
BarnieTrk
BarnieTrk is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Stanton, Michigan, USA
Posts: 2,017
Received 56 Likes on 49 Posts
Originally Posted by RangerPilot
.87 for 5th (OD) as far as I know.
So If 5th gear is indeed a 0.87 ratio gear; then with 3.73 rear gears, the final drive ratio would be: 3.73 x .087 = 3.25.

With at least a 29" tall tire, the 65-mph cruising rpms still wouldn't be too bad for mileage.......

Thanks for setting me straight, RangerPilot!

BarnieTrk
 
  #14  
Old 11-06-2005, 02:33 PM
MikeUB's Avatar
MikeUB
MikeUB is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
thx a buinch for the info guys, i should have told you i also own a 02 cougar so i know whats its like tryin to get Hp out of a small engine(2.5L V6 in the cougar btw) the ranger is manual though, i'm not much for automatic. glad to know you can get some of the focus stuff to work in it.

thx for all the help.
 
  #15  
Old 11-06-2005, 03:42 PM
RangerPilot's Avatar
RangerPilot
RangerPilot is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Durant, OK (SOSU)
Posts: 8,462
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Love them Cougars, my best friend has one, we did a little modding on it just for kicks.
I'm with ya 100% Mike, loved the automatics my 'rents have until my truck came along, now I have withdrawal shakes if there's not a stick to hold...
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Charlie Tee
1983 - 2012 Ranger & B-Series
0
10-01-2015 09:12 AM
kristof2
1983 - 2012 Ranger & B-Series
7
09-27-2014 06:31 PM
mike yates
1983 - 2012 Ranger & B-Series
43
10-01-2012 03:57 PM
2valvekid
1983 - 2012 Ranger & B-Series
2
09-25-2011 08:06 AM
nathan5603
1983 - 2012 Ranger & B-Series
22
12-07-2006 08:41 PM



Quick Reply: 2004 2.3L Ranger performance?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:28 PM.