Ford Truck Enthusiasts, The Internet's Leading Ford Trucks Resource, F150
 

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Performance, Engines and Troubleshooting > Other Ford Engines > 4 Cylinder Engines
New! Use your Facebook, Google, AIM & Yahoo accounts to securely log into this site, click logo to login  






Is F-150 Still King?
 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 11-20-2005, 07:23 PM
Bart99GT Bart99GT is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,207
Bart99GT is starting off with a positive reputation.
I'm going to inflame some people, but there's no difference between a turbo block (SVO) and n/a blocks of the same year apart from a drilled and tapped hole on the passenger's side of the block. The boss is present on the n/a blocks of the same years, but there's no hole there.

Unless of course you're referring to the very limited production tall deck block. I think there were only a few hundred of those made.
__________________
1995 Ranger XLT SuperCab, SOHC 2.3L, Mazda 5-speed
1986 1D Mustang SVO
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 11-20-2005, 09:15 PM
99F150 99F150 is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Sioux Falls SD
Posts: 1,043
99F150 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bart99GT
I'm going to inflame some people, but there's no difference between a turbo block (SVO) and n/a blocks of the same year apart from a drilled and tapped hole on the passenger's side of the block. The boss is present on the n/a blocks of the same years, but there's no hole there.

Unless of course you're referring to the very limited production tall deck block. I think there were only a few hundred of those made.

If they are the same, why were the turbo blocks like the one in my 1987 Thunderbird Turbo coupe cast in Brazial?
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 11-21-2005, 08:24 AM
tomw tomw is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: suburban atlanta
Posts: 2,169
tomw is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
I think the Lima became a Brazilian product only in the 80's. They weren't made in the Lima,OH plant any more. But, don't bet your paycheck.
tom
__________________
It's not how hard you work, it's how much you get done. Simplificate and add lightness

Last edited by tomw; 11-21-2005 at 08:29 AM. Reason: spelling
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 11-21-2005, 12:13 PM
Bart99GT Bart99GT is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,207
Bart99GT is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 99F150
If they are the same, why were the turbo blocks like the one in my 1987 Thunderbird Turbo coupe cast in Brazial?
Because like today with the 4.6L and 5.4L V8s, the blocks all aren't cast or assembled at the same location. Ford used the 2.3L in a variety of applications and I suspect that they may have relocated the production of car engines to Brazil because they are "dressed" differently than truck engines of the same model year and therefore usually aren't built on the same line. Parts like alternators, PS pumps, A/C compressors, wiring, motor mounts, etc., are generally always installed at the engine manufacturing plant. While the part may be common to both car and truck engines, they may use different mounting brackets and will almost certainly use different mounts and wiring layouts.

Primarily what I was referring to was the rumor that the turbo blocks had a higher nickel content in them than the n/a blocks. Nothing I have ever read anywhere can substantiate that rumor, apart from random postings on various internet message boards that only spread the rumor further without any real proof. Apart from changes made for EFI vs. Carb and then TFI vs. DIS blocks there has been no significant strength change made to a factory 2.3L block that I'm aware of. The only 2.3L block that was beefed up in any way was the Motorsport tall-deck block. That said, there are plenty of people running n/a blocks in turbo cars that are making 300+ hp to the wheels, yet people continue to ask what's the best block to use for a n/a or mild turbo rebuild.
__________________
1995 Ranger XLT SuperCab, SOHC 2.3L, Mazda 5-speed
1986 1D Mustang SVO
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 11-21-2005, 12:56 PM
99F150 99F150 is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Sioux Falls SD
Posts: 1,043
99F150 is starting off with a positive reputation.
I believe I read in a article in Hot rod mag some years back. They ran a story on Joe Morgan and his poisenious Pinto. The Pinto ran a 870r 88 tbird turo motor that was cast in Braziale. I thought it was mentioned in the article that those blocks had higher nickel content. Any way he ran the Pinto at Imprt drags blowing every one away and was allowed due to the motor being built in Braziale.
I will have to dig up the mag to check, I also have seen this in other print, but need to find the copies.
Dan
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
23 , 23l , 25 , block , coupe , deck , difference , ford , identify , l , liter , mustang , speed , svo , tall , turo , versus

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:58 PM.

Guidelines - Contact Us - Ford Truck Enthusiasts - Archive - Top

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 1997-2008 Internet Brands, Inc.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. FordŽ is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.