Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Regional Chapters > Western Region > Alaska Chapter
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?


Alaska Chapter Join Chapter, Leader: bearman113

Welcome to Ford-Trucks Forums!
Welcome to Ford-Trucks.com.

You are currently viewing our forums as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Ford-Trucks Forums community today!





 
View Poll Results: Should we build the Knik Bridge?
Yes 4 50.00%
No 1 12.50%
Undecided 3 37.50%
Voters: 8. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 08-22-2005, 11:30 AM
Twin Tritons's Avatar
Twin Tritons Twin Tritons is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Fairbanks, AK
Posts: 682
Twin Tritons is starting off with a positive reputation.
Knik bridge?

As Alaskans, we have all heard about building a bridge over the Knik River to connect Anchorage to Point MacKenzie over the years. A recent arcticle in the Anchorage Daily News states estimates somewhere between $400 and $600 million with only $229 million in federal monies. That's alot of money to be made up by state and local agencies, plus these are only estimates and will most likely run over those amounts.

First off, I feel they should work on Anchorage's traffic patterns BEFORE they think about building a bridge. Anchorage could use a bypass expressway that allows you to drive in on the Glenn Highway and exit south on the Seward Highway. Going downtown on the Glenn turning on Gambell before you get on the the Seward Highway is terrible. Taking Muldoon/Tudor is not better either.

Secondly, I think the bridge should be a toll bridge. The users that benefit the most from it should be willing to pay to use it. I have heard that it would not cut down the commute time from Anchorage to Wasilla, but rather just open up more land at Point MacKenzie for Anchorage to expand. Yes, Anchorage does need more land to expand. With all available land pretty much developed, there is no room for new construction. It is hard to bring new businesses in because they don't have room for offices or even homes for employees.

I am sure there are a lot of good reasons for and against a bridge and I'd love to hear your feedback. Please vote on the poll.
__________________
2008 F-450 King Ranch CC, LB, DRW, 4x4, 6.4 PowerStroke, Auto, 4.30

2010 F-150 Raptor 4x4, 6.2L
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-23-2005, 10:15 AM
GaryT GaryT is offline
Junior User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Eagle River Alaska
Posts: 89
GaryT is starting off with a positive reputation.
Well you have to get something out of congress. $229 million is lot of pork, but Anchorage needs some place for the daily workers to live. About the only ones who will be able to call Anchorage home thanks to ridiculous exclusion (zoning) laws, is Section 8 welfare cases and those who blessed with lots of old money.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-23-2005, 06:43 PM
racinghoss's Avatar
racinghoss racinghoss is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Frederick MD & missing AK
Posts: 279
racinghoss is starting off with a positive reputation.
What will it do to the local economy along the Glenn when the tourists start taking the bridge to get north to the park and Fairbanks? How many motels, restaurants, and any other business the depends on tourist traffic will suffer.
Although, it will mean jobs for a while at least.

Also, as a biologist (*yet not a tree-hugger) what environmental impact will it have? I am sure that has all been hashed out already though.

It would be nice to have a more direct route and maybe it could relieve some traffic congestion, too.

Make it a toll bridge with large fees for out of state vehicles and lower rates for locals.
__________________
2005 F-250 XLT CC SB, 5.4, TQShift, Man. 4x4, 3.73
2008 Expedition EL Eddie Bauer 4x4
2005 Keystone Springdale 27' Bunkhouse 5th Wheel
Gone:
1976 F-250 4x4 HighBoy, 390, 4sp
(2) 1990 F-150's, 300/6, 5 sp, (1 4x4 and 1 4x2)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-26-2005, 01:36 AM
AK4Wheeler's Avatar
AK4Wheeler AK4Wheeler is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Eagle River, Alaska
Posts: 101
AK4Wheeler is starting off with a positive reputation.
Our N and S bound Glenn highways need to be widened first. I live in Eagle River and drive a tractor truck back and forth to Anchorage and one of the worst hangups for traffic is the Eagle River bridge. N and S bound at that bridge is horrible.. The state needs to add another lane both directions then Raise and straighten out the bridge/lane. That is such a bottleneck, especially in the winter. If you commute than you know what Im taking about. Rush hour can be hell at the ER bridge. Plus Ive heard the "proposed" bridge wouldnt cut your commute time by much anyway.

Anyway just my $.02
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-27-2005, 12:23 AM
mlb4966's Avatar
mlb4966 mlb4966 is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Valdez, Alaska
Posts: 1,532
mlb4966 is starting off with a positive reputation.
The only section of the drive from Valdez to Anchorage that I usually dread is from Palmer to Anchorage. I would like to see better road maintance of existing roads then a bridge but thats a bias opinion on my part. I am sure those that live west of Wasilla and commute to Anchorage would love the bridge and I can see why.

If it does happen I think a toll is a good idea.
__________________
Mike B

1999 F350 CC DW 2V V10 - 2000 F350 CC - Flatbed 7.3
2002 F250 SC - V10 - 2004 F350 CC - 6.O (Terd-Injectors)
2006 F350 CC Lariat - 6.0 (Terd 2 - Head Gasket)
2011 F350 CC 6.2 - The future shall tell
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-28-2005, 10:09 PM
WilliesSD250's Avatar
WilliesSD250 WilliesSD250 is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Galax, VA
Posts: 849
WilliesSD250 is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Twin Tritons
As Alaskans, we have all heard about building a bridge over the Knik River to connect Anchorage to Point MacKenzie over the years. A recent arcticle in the Anchorage Daily News states estimates somewhere between $400 and $600 million with only $229 million in federal monies. That's alot of money to be made up by state and local agencies, plus these are only estimates and will most likely run over those amounts.

First off, I feel they should work on Anchorage's traffic patterns BEFORE they think about building a bridge. Anchorage could use a bypass expressway that allows you to drive in on the Glenn Highway and exit south on the Seward Highway. Going downtown on the Glenn turning on Gambell before you get on the the Seward Highway is terrible. Taking Muldoon/Tudor is not better either.

Secondly, I think the bridge should be a toll bridge. The users that benefit the most from it should be willing to pay to use it. I have heard that it would not cut down the commute time from Anchorage to Wasilla, but rather just open up more land at Point MacKenzie for Anchorage to expand. Yes, Anchorage does need more land to expand. With all available land pretty much developed, there is no room for new construction. It is hard to bring new businesses in because they don't have room for offices or even homes for employees.

I am sure there are a lot of good reasons for and against a bridge and I'd love to hear your feedback. Please vote on the poll.
I couldn't agree more. Anchorage needs a bypass first. All "heavy" traffic, and thru traffic would benefit greatly from a bypass. Then they need to add an additional N and S lanes all the way to the Palmer-Wasilla cloverleaf. At the same time they need to totally redo the ER bridge. Then lastly they need to do a Knik Bridge. But who knows, it might be a pet project of our great governor. It might even be built big enough to land his JET on !!!
__________________
It's not the length of life, but the depth of life.
Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2005, 10:09 PM
Reply

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Regional Chapters > Western Region > Alaska Chapter

Tags
4x4, knik

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Statement - Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. FordŽ is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.

vbulletin Admin Backup