Ford Truck Enthusiasts, The Internet's Leading Ford Trucks Resource, F150
 
Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Performance, Engines & Troubleshooting > Ford V6 > 3.0L V6
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?
Register - Join us, its Free! Albums FAQ Members Tech Guides Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read VendorsUsed CarsGarage
Welcome to Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums





 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 07-13-2005, 12:11 AM
daedgar daedgar is offline
Freshman User
Garage is empty, add now
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Long Beach Ca
Posts: 27
daedgar is starting off with a positive reputation.
Rate your Ranger- Truck & 3.0 engine 1-10

I rate the truck a 6, looks good, too small and no where to put anything. the engine a 4, no power and bad gas milage. Do you think Ford cares?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 07-13-2005, 10:34 AM
wintremute's Avatar
wintremute wintremute is offline
Elder User
Garage is empty, add now
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Graves County, KY
Posts: 537
wintremute is starting off with a positive reputation.
Exterior: 8. good looking truck, but I liked the grille on my 98 better.

Interior: 6. could be roomier, that dash is a foot thick. Move it all forward and make the xcab part deeper. Other than that it's nice.

Engine: 4. disappointing in just about every way. Not enough power, so-so mileage.

Transmission: 2. It shifts whenever it feels like it.

56,000 miles and I keep having to replace sensors everywhere. I really wish I had kept my 98 2.5 5-speed, but I just had to have a supercab and a v6
__________________
77 F150 Ranger 302 c4 2.79

88 F250 XLT Lariat Supercab 4x4 460 C6 4.10's
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 07-15-2005, 03:08 PM
fordboy_52's Avatar
fordboy_52 fordboy_52 is offline
Moderator
1995 little yellow tonka truck
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Abilene Kansas
Posts: 6,428
fordboy_52 is a splendid one to beholdfordboy_52 is a splendid one to beholdfordboy_52 is a splendid one to beholdfordboy_52 is a splendid one to beholdfordboy_52 is a splendid one to beholdfordboy_52 is a splendid one to beholdfordboy_52 is a splendid one to beholdfordboy_52 is a splendid one to behold
amen on sensors,i just got a light last night and another o2 sensor is out, they are like lightbulbs in my house... they pop all the time

Matt

p.s. anyone know how to bypass these? mabey just short the wires?
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 07-20-2005, 01:01 PM
wintremute's Avatar
wintremute wintremute is offline
Elder User
Garage is empty, add now
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Graves County, KY
Posts: 537
wintremute is starting off with a positive reputation.
this afternoon's project is a fuel filter.... trying to track down a sudden loss of power... ARGH!

FOR SALE!
__________________
77 F150 Ranger 302 c4 2.79

88 F250 XLT Lariat Supercab 4x4 460 C6 4.10's
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 07-27-2005, 10:16 AM
TwoDollarBill TwoDollarBill is offline
Junior User
Garage is empty, add now
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Abingdon, VA
Posts: 67
TwoDollarBill is starting off with a positive reputation.
My ranger isn't powerful enough, but I've made it 7 years and 225,000+ miles and never broken down, never been to the shop except normal maint. I can't complain about that.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 07-27-2005, 12:43 PM
TallPaul's Avatar
TallPaul TallPaul is offline
Post Fiend
2001 Ford Ranger
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Metro Detroit (Redford)
Posts: 5,819
TallPaul is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
OK, I can't stand it any longer. Just have to talk about this engine, even though mine is in an Aerostar ('92). We all know it is low on torque and gets poor mileage, but aside from that it is a GREAT and reliable engine and it moves decently if you don't mind revving the thing a lot.
__________________

'01 Ranger, 2.3L, 5 speed, 83,000 miles. Redline MTL, Amsoil Signature 5w20, Wix Oil Filter, Dynomax Super Turbo muffler.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 07-31-2005, 07:45 PM
RagunCajun's Avatar
RagunCajun RagunCajun is offline
Senior User
Garage is empty, add now
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 110
RagunCajun is starting off with a positive reputation.
my truck ran a 17.778 in the 1/4 mile last night. Thats slow as helll but i still like my truck and engine. i give it a 8. Never gives me crap even though i run it hard.
__________________
new ride: 2004 Lightning. viper spec t56, 2.3 whipple blah blah
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 08-23-2005, 09:56 AM
3Lstroker 3Lstroker is offline
Junior User
Garage is empty, add now
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Fort Wayne
Posts: 87
3Lstroker is starting off with a positive reputation.
Truck gets a 9. I have owned it 10.5 yrs and it owes me absolutely nothing.

3.0 in stock form gets a 5. 3.0 in modified form gets a 9. 23mpg in town with a 5spd! I am still amazed at the torque this thing has between 1500 & 2000 rpm. I pulled a 5k pound trailer yesterday and pulled it at 50mph in od (1500rpm) up and over the interstate (bridge overpass) and only lost 3mph!
__________________
'03 Heritage Edition 4x4 Dark Shadow Grey/Black
4.6L, S&B CAI, MAC 75mm TB, JBA Stainless shortys, Magnaflow single 3" exhaust, Delta Force Tuned
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 08-23-2005, 10:09 AM
RangerRuss RangerRuss is offline
Elder User
Garage is empty, add now
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Cypress, CA
Posts: 711
RangerRuss is starting off with a positive reputation.
Have a fleet of Rangers - mostly 4-cylinder automatic transmission driven by various folk. They just hang in there with little difficulty. Over the years we have learned the "quirks" and the "tricks" to keep them running well. Some have over 200k. The latest batch have the 3.0 6-cylinder, automatic transmission and air conditioning.
They use more fuel and IMHO do not perform just a whole lot better than the 4 cylinder. Of course we do not tow anything and they usually only have one driver and reasonably light weight materials that are being carried.

Recently we sent six of our older trucks to the Delaware operation. Yes they have 200k on the clock however the bodies were in good shape and they were running well.

Russ
__________________
2002 XL 2.3 Automatic

1998 Contour Zetec 2.0 - RIP 5/7/2009
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 08-24-2005, 01:49 PM
05Edge's Avatar
05Edge 05Edge is offline
Freshman User
Garage is empty, add now
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 38
05Edge is starting off with a positive reputation.
I love my 3.0 Ranger! I've only had it about 4 weeks now, but I had a 94 for a couple of years. The Edge's Gas mileage is improving now, so I'm stil out on that, but I just took it to the mountains last week and it perfomed great! I'd say 10! (I have a lot more payments to make so I'd better still think it's a 10!)
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 08-24-2005, 08:13 PM
Thaxon Thaxon is offline
Freshman User
Garage is empty, add now
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 46
Thaxon is starting off with a positive reputation.
Ehh I'll give my 01 Edge 3.0 a 7, but that's because I got horrible gas mileage since I bought it used 1 year ago, but been doing some maintenance on it lately and it's improving. Changed the PCV last week, and it's like a new truck. My first ever vehicle I bought on my own was a 94 4 banger I got when I graduated HS. I put 225k on it with no probs. It was a definite 10.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 09-09-2005, 11:29 PM
Caplax40 Caplax40 is offline
Elder User
Garage is empty, add now
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 521
Caplax40 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Truck is a 1998 4x4 SC 3.0 5spd, with 85k miles on it.

I give it a 4.

Cons: Engine is weak, thirsty pile of trash, seats and visibility are horrendous for us tall folk (I'm 6'4"), interior is a torture chamber, quality is pretty shabby, 4wd system will (not might) fail, transmission sometimes won't engage 1st gear smoothly, horrible handling.

Pros: Looks good in the color I have (this red/orange mix, don't see too many of them around), pretty reliable, decent off-road and in inclement weather,heat and A/C is very very good, good stock stereo, cargo net, cup/cassette holder and that rollaway vinyl cover are nice addons in the rear cab area

This is my first, and last, domestic vehicle

FLAME ON!
__________________
1998 Ranger XLT 4x4 SC

Last edited by Caplax40; 09-09-2005 at 11:35 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 09-17-2005, 08:07 AM
TallPaul's Avatar
TallPaul TallPaul is offline
Post Fiend
2001 Ford Ranger
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Metro Detroit (Redford)
Posts: 5,819
TallPaul is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 3Lstroker
3.0 in stock form gets a 5. 3.0 in modified form gets a 9.
What modifications? I have not heard of anyone modifing the 3.0, but it would certainly be a good engine for it given it's durability.
__________________

'01 Ranger, 2.3L, 5 speed, 83,000 miles. Redline MTL, Amsoil Signature 5w20, Wix Oil Filter, Dynomax Super Turbo muffler.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 09-25-2005, 09:41 PM
wfordpower wfordpower is offline
Freshman User
Garage is empty, add now
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 39
wfordpower is starting off with a positive reputation.
I have a 2000 Ford Ranger off road package 3.0 V6 I think it is a pretty good runnin engine it is not a V8 by any means but I have not had any problems with it at all I pull a 12 ft trailler with a 500 or 600 lbs 4 wheeler on the trailler and have no problems at all. so i would give it a 10

I mean what are u wantin a little 3.0 to do ??? I guess I just dont get what u think this little motor should do for u all????
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 09-26-2005, 09:10 PM
03tremor 03tremor is offline
New User
Garage is empty, add now
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: ballwin MO
Posts: 10
03tremor is starting off with a positive reputation.
I have to give my 03 edge a 9, it gets me were I want to go, I dont really go anywhere that requires 4WD, but the added ground clearance is a plus, the engine does lack in power but I dont tow much but what I have pulled it does fine, not happy with the stock Radial Long Trails, not very good wet traction and I love the interior, I'm 6'2" and find it comfortable and the seats are way better than my last truck, a 96 LX with the vinyl bench seat, very cold in the winter time, and the tremor stereo is great
Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2005, 09:10 PM
Reply

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Performance, Engines & Troubleshooting > Ford V6 > 3.0L V6

Tags
2005, 30, 3000, 4x4, 6cylinder, boat, buy, engine, ford, lb, lsd, ranger, rate, rpms, stumbles, towing, truck

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.5.2 ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. FordŽ is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.



 
vbulletin Admin Backup