Finally got them posted! (KB supercharged V10 dyno numbers)
#1
Finally got them posted! (KB supercharged V10 dyno numbers)
Got my truck dyno tuned using SCT last week. Went pretty well although the weather conditions could have been a little better. The dyno used was a Mustang Dyno. My understanding is that this is the most accurate dyno that gives real world actual numbers. Calculations are made using a variety of info including vehicle weight. Unlike a dyno jet dyno which places no load on the engine, the MD places a load on the engine which simulates you rolling down the highway at full operating temp. I learned alot about dyno's that day.
Never knew that dyno jet style dyno's are basically showing flywheel horsepower and torque, some drivetrain loss but not much. The MD dyno is providing actual numbers, numbers that I am pretty happy with.
The SCT tuning resulted in max torque being made at 2900 rpm's and max hp being made at 4650 rpm's. Numbers are 319 rwhp and 465 ft lbs rwtq.
Those numbers were generated on a fairly hot, muggy day with the vehicle running at full operating temp and somewhat high inlet air temps. With the tune that I have now if the vehicle was cool and I had more favorable outdoor temps, the dyno numbers would have been higher.
I don't mind though because these numbers are much more accurate and I know now what my truck is putting down to the road. The water/methanol injection I installed definitely helped. It allowed for the tune to be done a little more aggressive.
With the Kenne Bell chip it was running 12 degrees of timing and now with the computer properly tuned for the injection it enabled the program to run a little over 15 degrees safely. The SCT tune was definitely worth the money, she really get's up and goes now.
Never knew that dyno jet style dyno's are basically showing flywheel horsepower and torque, some drivetrain loss but not much. The MD dyno is providing actual numbers, numbers that I am pretty happy with.
The SCT tuning resulted in max torque being made at 2900 rpm's and max hp being made at 4650 rpm's. Numbers are 319 rwhp and 465 ft lbs rwtq.
Those numbers were generated on a fairly hot, muggy day with the vehicle running at full operating temp and somewhat high inlet air temps. With the tune that I have now if the vehicle was cool and I had more favorable outdoor temps, the dyno numbers would have been higher.
I don't mind though because these numbers are much more accurate and I know now what my truck is putting down to the road. The water/methanol injection I installed definitely helped. It allowed for the tune to be done a little more aggressive.
With the Kenne Bell chip it was running 12 degrees of timing and now with the computer properly tuned for the injection it enabled the program to run a little over 15 degrees safely. The SCT tune was definitely worth the money, she really get's up and goes now.
Last edited by Monsta; 07-12-2005 at 02:58 PM.
#2
#3
#4
I hear what you're saying but to a degree that still doesn't make sense. If you're not spraying the water/methanol at the time of tuning, you won't know how far you can safely push the tune. Regardless, the SCT chip I have has a dial switch that allows me to go from one tune to the next and if I ever get a bad tank of gas or any other issues I can switch over to another program that is running less timing. I guess I consider that my insurance policy. BTW, I contacted Kennedy's when I was in the market for a supercharger and they told me it didn't exist my truck. I knew that was false because I seen it on the KB website. Needless to say, I ended up getting it straight from KB. Kennedy's response didn't sit to well with me so I never contacted them. Got my injection kit from Snow Performance.
#5
It wouldn't matter what if you used the water/alcohol during tuning or not as long as you safely tune the vehicle to run in the 12 to 1 a/f ratio range since its a forced induction application. If you were to have tuned it to say 13:4 to 1 or so then yes it would be a really bad idea and tuning that close to the edge is generally only done on race engines where your trying to get every last bit of power out of the motor. Tuning in the 12s and under a load condition like a Mustang is essentially the way to go because you know that under normal conditions the a/f is still in a safe range.
If you used the SCT chip and in Maryland then theres only two places that could have done it and only one if it was a Mustang Dyno. So you took it to Mt Airy Motors/Total Performance? There the only ones that I know of who fits that description. I work in Ellicott City but live in Lisbon and have been by there before. They installed my roll up hard bed cover, dual exhaust and SCT X-calibrator. They are building a friends 2003 Mustang with a stroked 4.6L and supercharger. He intends to use the SCT setup as well.
If you used the SCT chip and in Maryland then theres only two places that could have done it and only one if it was a Mustang Dyno. So you took it to Mt Airy Motors/Total Performance? There the only ones that I know of who fits that description. I work in Ellicott City but live in Lisbon and have been by there before. They installed my roll up hard bed cover, dual exhaust and SCT X-calibrator. They are building a friends 2003 Mustang with a stroked 4.6L and supercharger. He intends to use the SCT setup as well.
#6
#7
Trending Topics
#8
RichH, kenneBF at the end of his first post said" With the Kenne Bell chip it was running 12 degrees of timing and now with the computer properly tuned for the injection it enabled the program to run a little over 15 degrees safely. The SCT tune was definitely worth the money, she really get's up and goes now". So, are you saying that above 13.4:1 is unsafe?
#9
Originally Posted by RichH
If you used the SCT chip and in Maryland then theres only two places that could have done it and only one if it was a Mustang Dyno. So you took it to Mt Airy Motors/Total Performance? There the only ones that I know of who fits that description.
#10
Originally Posted by skipperw
RichH, kenneBF at the end of his first post said" With the Kenne Bell chip it was running 12 degrees of timing and now with the computer properly tuned for the injection it enabled the program to run a little over 15 degrees safely. The SCT tune was definitely worth the money, she really get's up and goes now". So, are you saying that above 13.4:1 is unsafe?
#12
You can buy relatively affordable datalogging wideband O2 sensors like the FJO units if you want to run a wideband all the time in your daily driver just in case. Also yes a high 13 to 1 a/f reading would be a bad idea on a daily driver where you had no way to monitor conditions for things like bad gas, heat soak, high humidity and things like that. You also need to pay attention to the amount of deviation that is seen during the dyno pull so that you don't have a large total deviation of something like .7 when if tuned properly you can tune any forced induction application to only have a total deviation of like .1 however not everyone wants to spend the extra amount of money for fine tuning like that.
#13
#14
I think that now that you got the tune, you should get one. That way, when you hit WOT you will see if it is running lean and you can back off before any damage is done. That is the only time I look at mine. I put mine on the dash. It is the gauge that is next to the steering column on the right.
#15