86 351W Horsepower
#3
09-15-1999, 04:03 PM
Postmaster
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Lee's Summit MO
Posts: 2,719
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#6
09-18-1999, 08:26 PM
Postmaster
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Lee's Summit MO
Posts: 2,719
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
86 351W Horsepower
According to the brochure...
It says:
THe 5.8l high output V-8 is the most powerful mid-size v-8 in its class, excellent for handling trailers up to 9300lbs. The free-breathing "holley 4180" 4-barrel carb with large 17" air cleaner and special low back pressure exhaust system, provides outstanding pickup and true-truck performance.
It doesn't list horsepower or torque ratings, I would go to a local Ford Dealership and they should have a book that could tell you...
Hope this helps some!
It says:
THe 5.8l high output V-8 is the most powerful mid-size v-8 in its class, excellent for handling trailers up to 9300lbs. The free-breathing "holley 4180" 4-barrel carb with large 17" air cleaner and special low back pressure exhaust system, provides outstanding pickup and true-truck performance.
It doesn't list horsepower or torque ratings, I would go to a local Ford Dealership and they should have a book that could tell you...
Hope this helps some!
#7
09-20-1999, 09:01 PM
86 351W Horsepower
Ihave a 87 spec book and if I remember correctly they are the same engines. Hp 190 at 4000 Rpm Torque 285 at 2600 Rpm with a automatic trans. 180 at 4000 Rpm Torque 270 at 2600 Rpm with a manual trans. Compression ratio is 8.3. 5.0 is HP 185 at 3800 Rpm torque is 270 at 2400 rpm.compression ratio is 9.0 Not much differance?
Trending Topics
#9
09-30-2004, 04:55 AM
Senior User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: New England
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Vin decoder
#10
10-01-2004, 12:44 AM
Posting Guru
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: SE Texas
Posts: 1,388
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#11
10-01-2004, 02:29 PM
Those ratings on that last link aren't completly correct, but, the 351 HO ratings looke like they are.
For one thing, they're listing the 351 for 82 and older as the W, that's completly wrong...
The numbers for listed for the 2bbl W are actually 351M numbers... The 2bbl W was 160 hp or so(don't have my spec books on hand.)
Actually, about the only ratings that are right for 80-86 are the 351 HO....
Even the 87 carbed 460 rating is wrong... It's 245 hp/385 ft/lbs...
For one thing, they're listing the 351 for 82 and older as the W, that's completly wrong...
The numbers for listed for the 2bbl W are actually 351M numbers... The 2bbl W was 160 hp or so(don't have my spec books on hand.)
Actually, about the only ratings that are right for 80-86 are the 351 HO....
Even the 87 carbed 460 rating is wrong... It's 245 hp/385 ft/lbs...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
littlehusky
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
40
12-01-2017 11:14 PM
redwoodlogger
1980 - 1986 Bullnose F100, F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
17
12-16-2014 01:52 PM
jrmandryck
1980 - 1986 Bullnose F100, F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
3
06-27-2009 11:12 PM
