Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > General > Ford vs The Competition
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?


Ford vs The Competition Technical discussion and comparison ONLY. Trolls will not be tolerated.

Reply
 
 
 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #16  
Old 06-12-2005, 09:50 AM
prcrboy's Avatar
prcrboy prcrboy is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 772
prcrboy is starting off with a positive reputation.
I just got a new chevy 2500hd at work which replaced a '00 F150. The F150 had the 4.2 v6 and I never had a single problem out of it. It had 150k when they gave me the new one. In alot of ways I liked the ford better than the new chevy, but my employer got alot cheaper price from chevy.

As far as the f150, it had a transmission and clutch put in it at 100k, but I kept it full of equipment. I'm a heat/air tech and it was OVERLOADED from day one. Average mileage was 12. Simply too much weight for the five speed and v6.

I agree with others on the used part. The 92-96 trucks are plentiful and they are built strong. If I was buying I would find one with the 300 six and automatic. Goobs of low end torque and good mpg. I've had 3 in the past and two had the 300 and the other had a 302. I prefred the 300.

If you have to go new, do as suggested, research. To find one without a/c, your gonna be lucky or have to order it. The ford is my choice, but that is partly due to personal preference.
__________________
Project= '79 F150 Lariat 4x4, 460/C6

"Engineers like to solve problems. If there are no problems handily available, they will create their own problems, "
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 06-12-2005, 10:47 AM
lectricman lectricman is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: In the swamps of Florida
Posts: 197
lectricman is starting off with a positive reputation.
Ford replaced the ailing OHC 4.2L for a new OHV 4.2L for 2005. The May/June issue of Truck Trend did a side by side comparison of the full size V-6's. They didn't actually test drive the trucks, just compared the engines. The specs are as follows:

Chevy/GMC: 4.3L OHV V-6 cast iron block and heads
HP: 195 @ 4600 rpm
Tq: 260 @ 2800 rpm
GVWR: 6100
Payload: 1875
Max towing cap: 5100
EPA milage (manual): 17/23

Ford: 4.2L OHV V-6 cast iron block and heads
Hp: 202 @ 4350 rpm
Tq: 260 @ 3750 rpm
GVWR: 6500
Payload: 1830
Max towing cap: 5600
EPA milage (manual): 15/20

Hope this helps.
__________________
"Where the truck's a Ford and the tractor's green"

1986 F-150 Supercab 2wd 302 FI, M5R2 5 speed 200k plus and still kicking

1997 Explorer 4dr. 4.0 OHV (the wifey's)
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 06-12-2005, 02:16 PM
hotrod_ta's Avatar
hotrod_ta hotrod_ta is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Silverdale, WA.
Posts: 726
hotrod_ta is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.hotrod_ta is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
I got my truck at "truck town" off of auto center way in Bremerton (hwy 3 north, just past gorst), good selection of clean used late model trucks at the best "dealer" prices I have found. They have all makes and models, and years vary from early ninties up to 2005.

My truck was bought to be a tow mule, hence the 460 and 4.10 gears. the 300 I6 would be a good choice for lighter duty and general cruising around.
My boss I work construction for has 190k on his 96 f150 with the 5.8L, it has driven overloaded since day one and is still holding up fairly well on almost all the original parts.

I am not sure of the tax laws, can you depreciate or write off a used truck for business purchases or does it have to be new?
__________________
Chris
http://www.ford-trucks.com/user_gall...id=105572&.jpg

The High Tech Redneck

Last edited by hotrod_ta; 06-12-2005 at 02:22 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 06-12-2005, 04:08 PM
polarbear's Avatar
polarbear polarbear is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Damascus-Boring, Ore
Posts: 10,729
polarbear is a splendid one to beholdpolarbear is a splendid one to beholdpolarbear is a splendid one to beholdpolarbear is a splendid one to beholdpolarbear is a splendid one to beholdpolarbear is a splendid one to beholdpolarbear is a splendid one to behold
The truck has to be new to you, not new in general.

For a Sect 179, the asset has to have a GVW of over 6000 lbs to qualify for the up-to $25K deduction, however assets under the 6000lb GVW could qualify for up to a $10K 179- so theoretically, a base Ranger would still fall into this catagory. Consult your tax professional to verifu this.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 06-12-2005, 04:09 PM
Fordsflylow's Avatar
Fordsflylow Fordsflylow is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: IL
Posts: 2,556
Fordsflylow has a great reputation on FTE.Fordsflylow has a great reputation on FTE.Fordsflylow has a great reputation on FTE.Fordsflylow has a great reputation on FTE.Fordsflylow has a great reputation on FTE.Fordsflylow has a great reputation on FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fordsflylow
In fact, my employer has the same year s-10 as my Ranger, a 94. It has a 4.2L w/20k less miles on it, is never used for real work and has had endless problems with it.
Correction, the s-10 is a 4.3L...brain fart!
__________________
99 F250 SD/SC XLT 6.8L/415ci, 4" lift, 202,000mi
94 Ranger SC XLT, 4.0L/244ci, stock, 223,000mi
Blue blood here!

"A 3% tax increase on the wealthiest Americans is socialism, but a 14% pay cut on the lower middle class is doing your part?" BS
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 06-12-2005, 06:37 PM
Tony1790's Avatar
Tony1790 Tony1790 is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Johnson City, TN
Posts: 396
Tony1790 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Hotrod - thanks for the input, I've dealt with Truck town before and they are pretty good. They usually have low mileage, late model trucks. They don't usually get many 300 I6's, they tend to like diesels.

Polarbear - it's been a few months since I've read the section 179 rules, from late last year they reduced the amount that an SUV could be deducted to 25k dollars, but trucks should still be at the higher 100k until 2007. That was part of Bush's recapitalization initative. The under 6k lb gvwr vehicles are deductible for reduced amounts and is in general harder for the average bear to figure out. Simpler for the over 6k lb vehicles.

My wife's Pilot has a gvwr of 5950 and the Explorer is 5984, both suspiously close but under the 6k gvwr needed. That makes you move up to an Expedition.

If I could get an EB Expedition for what I owe on the Pilot than that would get the Tax credit too.

PolarBear can I trade a 2005 Honda Pilot EX-Leather, AWD, moonroof, etc with 7000 miles for a new 2005 Ford Expedition EB, Leather, moonroof, AWD for what I owe on the Pilot ($25,500). The Pilot should have some positive equity, no?

Anyway, back to the shopping spree
Tony
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 06-12-2005, 07:49 PM
J..D J..D is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 167
J..D is starting off with a positive reputation.
Go test drive both of them yourself, For the body strenth on the ford and chevy the only reason the fords shows more when they remove the fenders is because the chevy has the support bulit in to the fenders. They are both good trucks just buy one that fits you best.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 06-12-2005, 08:23 PM
Godspeed474's Avatar
Godspeed474 Godspeed474 is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: san antonio texas
Posts: 113
Godspeed474 is starting off with a positive reputation.
sheesh get a 93-97 f-150 there cheap and they can ttake alot of crap and they aint that hard to work on if any thing goes wrong
__________________
1977 f-150 explorer 302 at (stupidly sold)
1996 Contour GL 2.0L DOHC zetec (not my problem anymore)
2004 ranger xlt flairside
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 06-12-2005, 08:25 PM
polarbear's Avatar
polarbear polarbear is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Damascus-Boring, Ore
Posts: 10,729
polarbear is a splendid one to beholdpolarbear is a splendid one to beholdpolarbear is a splendid one to beholdpolarbear is a splendid one to beholdpolarbear is a splendid one to beholdpolarbear is a splendid one to beholdpolarbear is a splendid one to behold
To be continued Monday! the graduation party marathon continues.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 06-13-2005, 05:39 PM
Tony1790's Avatar
Tony1790 Tony1790 is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Johnson City, TN
Posts: 396
Tony1790 is starting off with a positive reputation.
I went to the Casino after my niece and nephew's graduation party. Me and the little missus pulled about $400 in cash and free food in half an hour. Not too bad, that covered the graduation gifts, gas and time.

Tony
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 06-23-2005, 04:59 AM
Tony1790's Avatar
Tony1790 Tony1790 is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Johnson City, TN
Posts: 396
Tony1790 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Well I decided to buy the Ford, I know I should have bought a used one but I got a new truck for not much more than a used one would cost. MSRP $19,795 - 3k discount - 4k rebates - 1k positive trade value = $11,695

I'm trying to reduce my expenditures and traded in my wife's 05 Pilot in on a 05 F150 XL reg cab 2WD stick, which saves me about $250 a month. I even sold my Harley and a couple of months ago I sold the F250 in my Avitar.

I'm hoping that once business picks up I'll buy a new Van or Suv for the wife and a bigger truck for me, keeping the F150 for messy jobs..

Besides I got the F150 with A/C for what Chevy wanted for their Work truck without A/C, and the truly strange thing is that the Chevy had a $1600 dollar lower MSRP to begin with. So much for the GM employee price.

Tony

Last edited by Tony1790; 06-23-2005 at 05:03 AM.
Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2005, 04:59 AM
 
 
 
Reply

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2009 f250 rebates emd160 6.4L Power Stroke Diesel 5 07-15-2009 10:17 PM
Ford Truck Wrecking Yard Portland oregon 59INA40 1961 - 1966 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks 14 01-07-2009 07:26 PM
negotiating for dealer invoice.... kblazk 2004 - 2008 F150 19 04-09-2008 06:17 PM
Family vehicle: Expedition or Freestar or ??? Tony1790 Expedition & Navigator 28 11-11-2005 10:23 PM
Buy 2003 or wait? PatTheRat Car/truck Buying Advice 25 06-30-2003 07:45 AM


Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > General > Ford vs The Competition

Tags
cheap, dirt, ford, fords, trucks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump


Participate In The Forums

Create new posts and participate in discussions. It's free!

Sign Up »





All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 AC1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Statement - Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.

vbulletin Admin Backup