Have you registered for your free membership? If not, click here now to register!
 
  
Join Our Site - Its free, quick and easy!
Click Here to join.   Click Here for more information
Users Chatting None

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Older, Classic and Antique Trucks > 1987 - 1996 F150 And Larger F-Series Trucks
Register - Join us, its Free! FAQ Members List Timeslips Calendar Mark Forums Read

1987 - 1996 F150 And Larger F-Series Trucks





Is F-150 Still King?


 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 06-01-2005, 11:44 PM
Senior User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Montana
Posts: 130
FordCardinal is starting off with a positive reputation.
1993 F250

I just purchased a 1993 f250 2 wheel drive. The body is immaculate and it seems to drive just fine. However, many of my Ford colleagues have scolded me for buying it because it has a "weak" drive train. The cite the weka tranny (5 speed o/d) and engine (302 efi h.o. ) as being major drawbacks. Can anyone substantiate their claims? It is going to be a daily driver 80% of the time and then a camping and fishing rig the rest of the time.

Any info would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks!
   
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
To remove this ad, register today!

  #2 (permalink)  
Old 06-02-2005, 09:18 AM
frederic's Avatar
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 5,569
frederic has a great reputation on FTE.frederic has a great reputation on FTE.frederic has a great reputation on FTE.frederic has a great reputation on FTE.frederic has a great reputation on FTE.
The 302 is an okay engine, like all engines it has its strengths and weaknesses, but if it's in good running condition and was maintained well, it should last a long time.

Behind the 302 will be a mazda transmission which a lot of people seem to be afraid of, but it too is a fine part assuming it's been well maintained, and you intend to do so going forward.

It's not the transmission to have if you do more burnouts than driving miles, or if you intend to regularly overload the truck past it's hauling/towing capacity.

It's a light duty engine, a light duty transmission, in a light duty truck. Nothing wrong with the combination at all.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 06-02-2005, 03:05 PM
Senior User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Montana
Posts: 130
FordCardinal is starting off with a positive reputation.
Thanks for the response. Someone just told me to put synthetic engine oil in the tranny instead of ATF do you have any experience with that?

Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 06-02-2005, 09:30 PM
Elder User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 791
Lou Braun is starting off with a positive reputation.
Your transmission probably requires Mercon fluid like mine does. Changing the transmission fluid and filter are more important than worrying about using synthetic fluid. A good quality Mercon fluid will work just fine in your transmission.

The F-250 with a 302 has a tough drive line and will last a long time under heavy duty use. Lots of folk beat the tar out of this combination and it keeps on running.

Lou Braun
__________________
'06 F350XLT 4WD 6.0
'03 Cat MT295 4WD w/16 speed
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 06-02-2005, 09:36 PM
frederic's Avatar
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 5,569
frederic has a great reputation on FTE.frederic has a great reputation on FTE.frederic has a great reputation on FTE.frederic has a great reputation on FTE.frederic has a great reputation on FTE.
If it's an automatic, you should use what is in the book. They make specifications for a reason...

Ignore the "wive's tales"...
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 06-03-2005, 06:14 PM
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 3,956
SoCalDesertRider is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
For the Mazda 5-speed manual trans, the Haynes manual says it uses Mercon auto trans fluid, 7.6 pints.
__________________
Thanks, SoCal.

69 Bronco 302 & 92 F350 CrewCab 4x4 haulin' SixPac slide-in camper.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 06-03-2005, 09:41 PM
MustangGT221's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Topsfield, MA
Posts: 14,906
MustangGT221 has a good reputation on FTE.MustangGT221 has a good reputation on FTE.MustangGT221 has a good reputation on FTE.
Don't use synthetic...my buddy tried it and hated it.

Ford started making basically two versions of the F-250 at these times. They had your version, considered a light duty F-250. Then there was the 351/460/diesel engine options and ZF transmissions which are much stronger. Also, the heavy duty versions had full floating rear axles and some had Dana 50 front axles. The lighter duty has a semi-float rear end and most likely a Dana 44, both axles being TTB.

Your truck was ment to be a vehicle with the capacity inbetween an F-150 and an F-250. They still practice this here and there in todays models, trying to fill a niche market of consumers who would rather have that vehicle thinking the F-250 is too big and the F-150 is too small.
__________________
Justin-FTE Moderator
95' F-150 XLT 4x4, 393ci stroker, 5 spd, 6" lift/35s
04' Explorer Limited 4.6L
94' Cobra - 1 of 123 made, only 30k miles

87-96 Forum
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:11 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 1997-2008 Internet Brands, Inc.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - Jobs

Ford-Trucks.com and Internet Brands, Inc. is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company.