The new 2.3 liter

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 05-02-2005, 12:49 AM
1984 f-250's Avatar
1984 f-250
1984 f-250 is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Oregon
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The new 2.3 liter

I was wonder what Ford changed on the 2.3 engine. The focus ST has it and the base ranger. Its a quick with the 5 speed
 
  #2  
Old 05-02-2005, 06:44 AM
Gene K's Avatar
Gene K
Gene K is offline
Junior User
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The engine in the Focus is a clean sheet DOHC 16V.

It was also standard in previous Focus sold in Low-Emmissions States such as California and New Jersey. It was also availble as an option in 2004 Focus (Std some models) in other states.

It is basically the same 4 cylinder that dayviewed in the Mazda 6i but without Mazdas variable valve-timing.

Mazda had the lead in designing this engine.

The 2005 Focus 2.0L DOHC is also based on this engine. The Zetec 16V and the SPI 8V engines are history

Is this the same engine thats in the 2005 Ranger?
 
  #3  
Old 05-03-2005, 10:44 AM
1984 f-250's Avatar
1984 f-250
1984 f-250 is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Oregon
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes the base ranger has a 2.3 too.
 
  #4  
Old 05-05-2005, 10:10 AM
BroncoRoadKill's Avatar
BroncoRoadKill
BroncoRoadKill is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 2,195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My buddy had a 04 ranger with the DOHC 2.3L and 5spd.
This thing would get up and go.
 
  #5  
Old 09-07-2005, 02:09 PM
BigBear1's Avatar
BigBear1
BigBear1 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes! just, bought a '05 ranger 2.3 W/ 5-speed, it moves out. I think it helps that I have the 3.73 rear end gear (pretty low for a ranger in my opinion) I think it is pretty fast, but that could be because I'm used to my '85 f-250 W/ 300 c.i. inline 6. The F-250 can pull the ***** out of anything, but the ranger could definetly kick its a$$ in a drag race. I used to drive a '96 2.3 5-speed ranger at my summer job and my '05 definetly has more power, but I think that one had the higher 3.55 rear end gear
 
  #6  
Old 09-16-2005, 08:27 PM
Bart99GT's Avatar
Bart99GT
Bart99GT is offline
Laughing Gas
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,245
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The new 2.3L is up to 145 horses, only 3 shy of the 3.0L. It almost makes me wonder why Ford doesn't ditch the 3.0 V6 and just have the 4 cylinder and 4.0L SOHC as the only engine options for the Ranger. The 3.0L has no fuel economy advantage over the 4.0L and is almost matched for power by the 2.3L DOHC. Of course this is Ford we're talking about here...
 
  #7  
Old 09-16-2005, 10:41 PM
99F150's Avatar
99F150
99F150 is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Sioux Falls SD
Posts: 1,344
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts
I have the new 2.3 in my 05 escape. Very quick and smooth running. No timing belt to change.
 
  #8  
Old 09-17-2005, 02:26 AM
edgl's Avatar
edgl
edgl is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Lancaster, CA
Posts: 734
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have had 4 Rangers, and I now have a 2002 Mazda B2300, and that new 2.3 engine is really good. It runs very strong even with the auto trans I have in my truck.
 
  #9  
Old 09-19-2005, 03:39 PM
AlfredB1979's Avatar
AlfredB1979
AlfredB1979 is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Alvin, Texas.
Posts: 1,978
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Bart99GT
The new 2.3L is up to 145 horses, only 3 shy of the 3.0L. It almost makes me wonder why Ford doesn't ditch the 3.0 V6 and just have the 4 cylinder and 4.0L SOHC as the only engine options for the Ranger. The 3.0L has no fuel economy advantage over the 4.0L and is almost matched for power by the 2.3L DOHC. Of course this is Ford we're talking about here...
True. GM and pretty much anyoe else has gotten by with 2 engine options for their compact trucks for a good while now.

Maybe sooner than later, with the 2.3L going back into SuperCabs now, Ford will drop the 3.slow.

The 3.slow won't meet emissions before too long, if it even does without much effort now anyway.
 
  #10  
Old 11-01-2005, 09:10 AM
01_4cyl's Avatar
01_4cyl
01_4cyl is offline
Freshman User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Wisconsin Rapids, WI
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have an 01 2.3 Ranger with 177,000 miles on it. It's a good , dependable little motor. This summer I'm going to adjust the valves and probably change the timing chain and cam gears. I hope this truck goes at least 300,000 miles. The 30 mpg highway is really nice also.
 
  #11  
Old 11-01-2005, 12:10 PM
ghunt's Avatar
ghunt
ghunt is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Clarksburg WV
Posts: 3,724
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It doesn't have a timing chain, it has a belt...
 
  #12  
Old 11-01-2005, 12:13 PM
99F150's Avatar
99F150
99F150 is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Sioux Falls SD
Posts: 1,344
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts
Originally Posted by ghunt
It doesn't have a timing chain, it has a belt...
Wrong! The 2.3 from 2001 to present uses a Chain. What I find interesting is that the Ford website shows the 2.3 in the Ranger as having Mech. valves with buckets. My Escape with this engine is listed as having Hyd. valve system.

Dan
 
  #13  
Old 11-02-2005, 12:06 PM
ghunt's Avatar
ghunt
ghunt is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Clarksburg WV
Posts: 3,724
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I thought they had the old Lima-based engine clear up til they started using the Zetec. Ah well, I don't know rangers.
 
  #14  
Old 11-02-2005, 02:07 PM
99F150's Avatar
99F150
99F150 is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Sioux Falls SD
Posts: 1,344
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts
Originally Posted by ghunt
I thought they had the old Lima-based engine clear up til they started using the Zetec. Ah well, I don't know rangers.
Zetecs were never used in the Ranger. Only used in the Contour, Focus, Escort ZX2 and Escape I believe. Ford phased the Zetec out at end of 2004 for the duratec fours. They use a smaller version of the 2.3 in the Focus. 2.0L
 
  #15  
Old 11-02-2005, 05:13 PM
ghunt's Avatar
ghunt
ghunt is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Clarksburg WV
Posts: 3,724
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Somebody told me the new 2.3L was a zetec. I dunno.
 


Quick Reply: The new 2.3 liter



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:11 AM.