Will my 4.6 beat 'em?
#1
Will my 4.6 beat 'em?
I have a 2005 F150 4x2 regular cab long bed 4.6L auto. I was wondering how this truck would stack up against a Dodge 4.7L, Toyota Tundra, or an F150 5.4L.
I would assume I'd be able to beat 4-door models of these trucks due to their weight. By the way, how does the 4.6L horsepower and torque look compared to these? I forgot to mention I have 3.55 gearing.
I would assume I'd be able to beat 4-door models of these trucks due to their weight. By the way, how does the 4.6L horsepower and torque look compared to these? I forgot to mention I have 3.55 gearing.
#2
If the Dodge has the 20" wheels and the 3.92 axle, he will run out of sight from you. The 5 speed auto makes that much difference with the axle help as well. The Tundra in a regular cab will smoke your Ford as well. Both of the competitors engines are mighty strong for their size. Your Ford, however, on long runs will be running when they are refueling. Against the 5.4, personally I think the performance of the 5.4 is disappointing. While my 04 4.6 won't stay with one in a quarter mile, the 5.4 is just barely in front. All things considered, the Triton will probably out live the others including the heralded Toyota. While durability is the strong point of the Ford engine, performance is not. Rarely can you have both.
#3
#4
Originally Posted by fordmarshall111
I have a 2005 F150 4x2 regular cab long bed 4.6L auto. I was wondering how this truck would stack up against a Dodge 4.7L, Toyota Tundra, or an F150 5.4L.
I would assume I'd be able to beat 4-door models of these trucks due to their weight. By the way, how does the 4.6L horsepower and torque look compared to these? I forgot to mention I have 3.55 gearing.
I would assume I'd be able to beat 4-door models of these trucks due to their weight. By the way, how does the 4.6L horsepower and torque look compared to these? I forgot to mention I have 3.55 gearing.
The Dodge 4.7L will edge you out, mainly because you outweigh it by a couple hundred pounds (in comparable trim and configuration) and the Dodge has a 5 speed auto versus your 4 speed.
The Tundra should beat you also, because it is a lighter truck with a little more horsepower & more torque.
However, none of these are problems a Kenne Bell on your truck won't fix.
#5
Sounds cool guys. A supercharger may not be a bad idea...my truck is XL trim, just a basic work truck. Except for the dumped Flowmaster there'd be no indication of any performance whatsoever, if I left the work truck appearance. That would definitely be a sleeper worth having. What are the stock numbers on the 4.6, anybody know?
PS: My gas mileage isn't too bad at all. I got 14.71 mpg on the first tank, and I'm hoping for more once the engine breaks in (I'm at 330 miles right now).
PS: My gas mileage isn't too bad at all. I got 14.71 mpg on the first tank, and I'm hoping for more once the engine breaks in (I'm at 330 miles right now).
#7
So call me crazy but I thought it was quite powerful right now? I had a 1990 F250 with the 351w and 4.10s, but this truck moves quite a bit nicer, and handles hills better. It probably won't haul weight as well though. I always expected 3.55s to be slower than this from what I've read. What would I be looking at powerwise with the supercharger?
Trending Topics
#8
Originally Posted by fordmarshall111
So call me crazy but I thought it was quite powerful right now? I had a 1990 F250 with the 351w and 4.10s, but this truck moves quite a bit nicer, and handles hills better. It probably won't haul weight as well though. I always expected 3.55s to be slower than this from what I've read. What would I be looking at powerwise with the supercharger?
With an s/c I don't see why you wouldn't hit 300 or more at the wheels, compared to the 180 or so your seeing now.
When posting a reply that is directly above … THERE IS NO NEED TO USE THE QUOTE FUNCTION....lets say we get 2500 posts a week, just to pick a number, and only 50 percent used the quote function…well, you can imagine how many extra pages are used, and not needed…If you are pulling out a single line or sentences then do so and use the quote function.
Thanks Admin Tim here
Last edited by Ben99GT; 04-12-2005 at 09:28 AM.
#9
300 at the rear wheels? Thats enough to take a Hemi. If I add headers, intake, underdrive pulleys, and a chip along with the supercharger, would I be relatively competitive vs. other trucks? Furthermore, would adding lower gears increase acceleration? 3.73s? 4.10s?
Last edited by fordmarshall111; 04-12-2005 at 10:24 PM.
#11
#12
With that setup you should be competetive with or faster than a stock Lightining, depending on how much boost you run. Hemis and Titans won't be able to keep up at all.
You'll lose 2 - 3 mpg tops with a 4.10 gear swap. You used to be able get a set of 4.10s for an 8.8" from Gene Evans Ford for $139, I heard they went up to about $200 recently. The labor varies alot, the Ford dealership will want ~$300. If you can find somebody to do it on the side it can get alot cheaper.
Try to stick with Ford Racing or Ford gearsets, Richmond and other aftermarket gearsets tend to be a little noisier.
You'll lose 2 - 3 mpg tops with a 4.10 gear swap. You used to be able get a set of 4.10s for an 8.8" from Gene Evans Ford for $139, I heard they went up to about $200 recently. The labor varies alot, the Ford dealership will want ~$300. If you can find somebody to do it on the side it can get alot cheaper.
Try to stick with Ford Racing or Ford gearsets, Richmond and other aftermarket gearsets tend to be a little noisier.
Last edited by Ben99GT; 04-13-2005 at 11:17 AM.