351w torque cam help!
#1
351w torque cam help!
I have a 1985 351wHO and I am putting in a new cam. Since I use the engine for mudding and need lots of torque I am putting in a torque cam. I have been browsing internet sites and got specs as follows for a particular cam:
.448/.472 valve lift
204/214 duration at .050"
270/280 advertised duration
112 lobe separation
Fits 351W Fords 1969-91 all - and trucks up to 1996 with hydraulic flat-tappet cam
It says it is a very good cam for torque and it will work with my stock size springs. Do these numbers sound right? I have been comparing them to the stock numbers but I just dont know enough about this stuff to be able to relate these specs to real world performance. Is there any one who can steer me in the right direction? thanks.
.448/.472 valve lift
204/214 duration at .050"
270/280 advertised duration
112 lobe separation
Fits 351W Fords 1969-91 all - and trucks up to 1996 with hydraulic flat-tappet cam
It says it is a very good cam for torque and it will work with my stock size springs. Do these numbers sound right? I have been comparing them to the stock numbers but I just dont know enough about this stuff to be able to relate these specs to real world performance. Is there any one who can steer me in the right direction? thanks.
#2
#3
#4
jrocco, you have no problem with that much lift and your stock springs and all that. some one told me the other day that the lift I was looking at (.448/.472 valve lift ) was the limit for the other stock components. I just want to make sure and not have to do it all over again because either a cam doesnt perform the way I want it to or because a cam wont work at all and damage other things.
#5
#6
I used the same cam to build my 85 351HO. Very nice results. Good torque, barely noticable lope at a idle. Check Edelbrock they sell that cam and a performer intake to match. I also added comp cams railed roller rockers. That lift is enought to need the rails, much more and you need guide plates.
#7
Originally Posted by bluepartsman
jrocco, you have no problem with that much lift and your stock springs and all that. some one told me the other day that the lift I was looking at (.448/.472 valve lift ) was the limit for the other stock components. I just want to make sure and not have to do it all over again because either a cam doesnt perform the way I want it to or because a cam wont work at all and damage other things.
The pistons are the stock style (dished), and there was no valve to piston clearance problem with this combo.
I used the GT40P heads and the compression ratio is 9.0:1. I got the heads from Central Coast Mustang. They supplied them with Stainless Valves, 3-Angle Valve Job and High Lift Springs.
Trending Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jayman1976
FE & FT Big Block V8 (332, 352, 360, 390, 406, 410, 427, 428)
7
07-26-2013 06:41 PM
Sherlock
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
10
08-04-2006 12:07 AM
Rumproast
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
6
06-27-2006 01:40 PM