300 HP rating is misleading
#32
#35
#38
I cannot imagine the negative comments about the newer 5.4's. I have had Fords since 1966, and pickups since 1970 (Remember the Ranchero?). With my current '04, RCab, 5.4, I have far more power and comfort that I need. During my first month I was at 85mph without realizing/feeling it. My previous was 1993, 305. Great, hand care, synthetic oil every 1800 miles by my own hand. Received $150 over Top Blue book for it. It was nice, but my current '04 is like a dream come true.
#39
ctfordguy just droped off a 2005 Mustang GT when I picked up my truck (oil Change Clutch packs) And man that is one bad mother.
I had it for 3 days and 318 miles and no tickets thank god lota close call's had it up to (edit) way to fast mph.
I don't think i could own one could not keep my foot off the gas all i can say is wow for 25,000 to have one of the fastest car's on the street 0 to 60 4.2 1/4 mile 13.8 top speed 150 mph all stock WOW .
the one thing a bit on the small side and it stops like crap
I had it for 3 days and 318 miles and no tickets thank god lota close call's had it up to (edit) way to fast mph.
I don't think i could own one could not keep my foot off the gas all i can say is wow for 25,000 to have one of the fastest car's on the street 0 to 60 4.2 1/4 mile 13.8 top speed 150 mph all stock WOW .
the one thing a bit on the small side and it stops like crap
#40
I didnt state all the mods that I have. The stock powerstroke was definately not a speed demon, but my truck has more then stock stuff. Maybe I shot off my mouth, lol. I know my truck is a contender tho, and I love the feeling I get when I get on it.
Yes, motor is electric, and engine is what powers our auto mobiles. I could type motor faster tho, lol.
Yes, motor is electric, and engine is what powers our auto mobiles. I could type motor faster tho, lol.
#44
They are being "technically correct, the best kind of correct" to borrow a phrase from the Futurerama head bureaucrat.
Seriously, motor and engine have kinda merged in the English language.
It's still more correct to say internal combustion engine, with an electric starting motor, not the reverse.
Both sides are right in the sense that you got the info across, but didn't do so in the correct terminology.
You should be more careful, as the Department of Redundancy Department might be checking.
Chris
Seriously, motor and engine have kinda merged in the English language.
It's still more correct to say internal combustion engine, with an electric starting motor, not the reverse.
Both sides are right in the sense that you got the info across, but didn't do so in the correct terminology.
You should be more careful, as the Department of Redundancy Department might be checking.
Chris
#45