Ford Truck Enthusiasts, The Internet's Leading Ford Trucks Resource, F150
 

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > General > Ford vs The Competition
New! Use your Facebook, Google, AIM & Yahoo accounts to securely log into this site, click logo to login  

Ford vs The Competition Technical discussion and comparison ONLY. Trolls will not be tolerated.






Is F-150 Still King?
 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #76 (permalink)  
Old 05-25-2009, 11:48 AM
tjc transport's Avatar
tjc transport tjc transport is offline
oh no, not again!!
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Laurence Harbor N.J.
Posts: 14,929
tjc transport has a spectacular reputation. tjc transport has a spectacular reputation. tjc transport has a spectacular reputation. tjc transport has a spectacular reputation. tjc transport has a spectacular reputation. tjc transport has a spectacular reputation. tjc transport has a spectacular reputation. tjc transport has a spectacular reputation. tjc transport has a spectacular reputation. tjc transport has a spectacular reputation. tjc transport has a spectacular reputation.
more on the turdburglers claim from this morning.

it has a superchips program installed into the computer. not a chip, a reprogramming. it is all stock, but puts out 611 HP and 1125ft lbs of rear wheel torque on the dyno 4 weeks ago. i asked to see the dyno slip, and he said he did not get one.
__________________
Tom
JOIN THE NEW JERSEY CHAPTER CLICK HERE

owner of way too many fords.
Reply With Quote
  #77 (permalink)  
Old 05-25-2009, 01:37 PM
snipAR-15 snipAR-15 is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 228
snipAR-15 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by tjc transport View Post
more on the turdburglers claim from this morning.

it has a superchips program installed into the computer. not a chip, a reprogramming. it is all stock, but puts out 611 HP and 1125ft lbs of rear wheel torque on the dyno 4 weeks ago. i asked to see the dyno slip, and he said he did not get one.
Hey, some people need to say these kinds of things to make themselves feel better about hat they drive.
Reply With Quote
  #78 (permalink)  
Old 05-25-2009, 03:52 PM
tjc transport's Avatar
tjc transport tjc transport is offline
oh no, not again!!
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Laurence Harbor N.J.
Posts: 14,929
tjc transport has a spectacular reputation. tjc transport has a spectacular reputation. tjc transport has a spectacular reputation. tjc transport has a spectacular reputation. tjc transport has a spectacular reputation. tjc transport has a spectacular reputation. tjc transport has a spectacular reputation. tjc transport has a spectacular reputation. tjc transport has a spectacular reputation. tjc transport has a spectacular reputation. tjc transport has a spectacular reputation.
yup. he also told me that it runs consistent 12.2 second quarter mile runs. and that i should run 4 wheel drive when i want to take off hard, because the wheels will not spin. all the 4 wheel drive racers run like this to prevent wheel spin.

he also has a pos duster with a stock 2 barrel 293 in to with an automatic trans and open pipes off the stock manifolds.


he claims it runs consistent 9.5 quarter mile runs.


with his 375lb tub of lard butt in the driver seat.
__________________
Tom
JOIN THE NEW JERSEY CHAPTER CLICK HERE

owner of way too many fords.
Reply With Quote
  #79 (permalink)  
Old 05-25-2009, 04:01 PM
snipAR-15 snipAR-15 is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 228
snipAR-15 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by tjc transport View Post
yup. he also told me that it runs consistent 12.2 second quarter mile runs. and that i should run 4 wheel drive when i want to take off hard, because the wheels will not spin. all the 4 wheel drive racers run like this to prevent wheel spin.

he also has a pos duster with a stock 2 barrel 293 in to with an automatic trans and open pipes off the stock manifolds.


he claims it runs consistent 9.5 quarter mile runs.


with his 375lb tub of lard butt in the driver seat.
sounds like a fat guy I used to know. He drove a GMC and always told me how much better it was than my POS ford (i.e. fords always break, they are crappy, they dont make any power, etc.) Eventually though, I just learned to ignore it and laugh about it. (He shut up though after I came and picked his ass up when his precious gmc died and wouldn't start. That make my day. )
Reply With Quote
  #80 (permalink)  
Old 06-18-2009, 12:59 PM
wiscvanman wiscvanman is offline
Freshman User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: racine wisc
Posts: 48
wiscvanman is starting off with a positive reputation.
several years back in this thread someone suggested a cat motor in an f 650. well, in 2009, cat is done making engines. epa and calif emissions killed them. be wary of any truck with a 3126 engine. they were not tough enough for some particular styles of trucking and are costly to rebuild/fix.
__________________
05 e 250
4.6 second jasper installed
used for expedited frt devlivery
Reply With Quote
  #81 (permalink)  
Old 06-28-2009, 02:20 PM
Jonas1022's Avatar
Jonas1022 Jonas1022 is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: DFW Metromess, TX.
Posts: 612
Jonas1022 is starting off with a positive reputation.
No Cats for me...


I do know of a F-350 that had a Cat installed. It was used for Hot Shot delivery from Ft. Worth to OKC/KC/Little Rock/ El Paso/etc. The chassis had over a million miles on it (with several repairs of course), and the engine was a replacement for a 460 cid V-8 that was the original installation when deleivered from Ford. I think that was an 82 or 83 MY cab chassis. It's still on the road, but is local use only. The long shots out of town are done using an F-450 (?). I have no idea what engine either.
__________________
1994 Ford F-150 XL
2000 Escort ZX2 Sport (deceased)
2001 Mustang Bullitt GT
2002 Chrysler PT Cruiser
2008 Mazda Tribute iSport
Reply With Quote
  #82 (permalink)  
Old 06-30-2009, 05:50 PM
Logical Heritic Logical Heritic is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,291
Logical Heritic is new and has a neutral reputation at this point.
Quote:
Originally Posted by tjc transport View Post
i had one of the local my dodge is better than your ford buttheads this morning tried to tell me his pos dodge turd regularly gets 33 mpg on the highway and 30 mpg around town when i commented
I drive a very detuned full size diesel sedan and it regulary knocks out 50 on the hwy. However, you gotta really work it to get it up to speed on an on ramp. I dont think that would be practical in a towing rig to detune enough to get that extreme of mileage.

A long time ago a guy with a bare bones 2 wheel drive 12v cummins tuned for mileage and was able to get 30 mpg in flat country. No way that dipschmidt your talkin to even gets 20.

There was an ecm reprogram available for the 24v cummins but you had to ship your ecm to italy. Coincidently they had a very nice mpg tune.
Reply With Quote
  #83 (permalink)  
Old 10-30-2009, 05:31 PM
thefordlane thefordlane is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1
thefordlane is starting off with a positive reputation.
This summer me and my buddies were rodeoing a bunch. We did most of our pullin(28` 5 horse with living quarter all steel heavy as hell) with my buddies dodge (07 megacab 6.7 cummins drw)and got between 8-10 until he put a dpf delete and then we were gettin about 12-14. Then we used my dads pickup(07 ford 6.0 psd srw) and we were geting about 10-12. Personally from driving them both the dodge can pull better but not as nice to drive as the ford. Hopefull this helps.
Reply With Quote
  #84 (permalink)  
Old 11-08-2009, 11:26 PM
FordLariat FordLariat is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: pound
Posts: 1,396
FordLariat is starting off with a positive reputation.
In my experience, the PSD will outlast the Cummins. The Cummins engines have a lot of little issues, such as oil pumps, fuel rails, etc... that go wrong a lot. Also, as said, the rest of the truck will apart around the Cummins engine anyway.
Reply With Quote
  #85 (permalink)  
Old 11-09-2009, 12:21 AM
BigDaddy6969 BigDaddy6969 is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 449
BigDaddy6969 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Dude as long as I've been posting here you've done nothing but sit around and wait for somebody to say something good about the CTD and then chime in with a known fallacy and justify it by saying "in my experience". You are about as realistically factual as 93Ranger, you are just more literate. We all know you have a deep seated hatred for the CTD and a hard on for the PSD, feel free to not reaffirm that everytime a newbie comes to the forums.
__________________
2008 Dodge 3500, CTD, Auto, 4X4, 4 door dually

2008 Chevy 2500, 6.0, Auto, 4X4, 4 door shortbox
Reply With Quote
  #86 (permalink)  
Old 11-09-2009, 07:56 PM
dkf's Avatar
dkf dkf is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Pa
Posts: 4,813
dkf has a good reputation on FTE. dkf has a good reputation on FTE. dkf has a good reputation on FTE.
The whole diesel longevity thing has had a wrench thrown in the works with these new emissions regulations. DPF, EGR and all that other crap just fries (puts heat back in the motor) the new diesels, thus lowering the service life.
__________________
FS: Factory Tech Valve Body for 4R100 http://www.ford-trucks.com/classifie...ct/27799/cat/5

69,873,761 firearms owners killed no one yesterday....
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
1996 , 2005 , 3500 , cummins , cylinder , economy , ford , fuel , milage , mileage , miledge , mpg , powerstroke , top , vs

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:43 PM.

Guidelines - Contact Us - Ford Truck Enthusiasts - Archive - Top

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 1997-2008 Internet Brands, Inc.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. FordŽ is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.