Ford Truck Enthusiasts, The Internet's Leading Ford Trucks Resource, F150
 

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > General > Ford vs The Competition
New! Use your Facebook, Google, AIM & Yahoo accounts to securely log into this site, click logo to login  

Ford vs The Competition Technical discussion and comparison ONLY. Trolls will not be tolerated.






Is F-150 Still King?
 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-25-2005, 11:12 AM
nouseforaname836 nouseforaname836 is offline
New User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: thompson ct
Posts: 5
nouseforaname836 is starting off with a positive reputation.
ford 460 chevy 454 dodge 440

the big 3 all had the big beasty engine, which is the best? just curious
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 02-25-2005, 11:33 AM
Frost13's Avatar
Frost13 Frost13 is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Nowhere, SE OK
Posts: 1,209
Frost13 is starting off with a positive reputation.
i kinda like the 440. the biggest gas guzzler, but it's a performance engine.
__________________
I BLEED SOONER RED! GO SOONERS!


1994 F-150 S/C S/B 2wd XL, 300, 5-speed, 3.55, 183k
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 02-25-2005, 11:44 AM
camo4stealth's Avatar
camo4stealth camo4stealth is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Idaho
Posts: 807
camo4stealth is starting off with a positive reputation.
The GM 454 has more units produced, I believe. There are more hot rod parts available for it at a lower cost than the other two, wether its the best is endlessly debateable.
__________________
99 F-250SD,x/cab,s/box,4x4, v-10,5spd,MAFS,BBK throttle body, Diablo chip,Borla headers,Flowmaster
Tire tracks all across your back, baby, I can see that you've had your fun-- Jimi Hendrix
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 02-25-2005, 07:23 PM
IB Tim's Avatar
IB Tim IB Tim is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: 3rd Rock
Posts: 52,671
IB Tim has a superb reputation IB Tim has a superb reputation IB Tim has a superb reputation IB Tim has a superb reputation IB Tim has a superb reputation IB Tim has a superb reputation IB Tim has a superb reputation IB Tim has a superb reputation IB Tim has a superb reputation IB Tim has a superb reputation IB Tim has a superb reputation
Quote:
Originally Posted by nouseforaname836
the big 3 all had the big beasty engine, which is the best? just curious
...Welcome to Ford Truck Enthusiasts! If you have a minute check out the Guidelines, it will help you to navigate through and understand FTE.

We are pleased you have chosen the best source for Fords!

Enjoy FTE
…..See you on the boards.
__________________
Administrator
tim.lamkin@internetbrands dot com
Life is not only time……paradoxically, it is the denial of time!
What lies behind us and what lies before us are tiny matters compared to what lies within us.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 02-25-2005, 08:26 PM
Fordlover55's Avatar
Fordlover55 Fordlover55 is offline
Post Fiend
1999 Ford F-150
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 5,932
Fordlover55 is a splendid one to behold Fordlover55 is a splendid one to behold Fordlover55 is a splendid one to behold Fordlover55 is a splendid one to behold Fordlover55 is a splendid one to behold Fordlover55 is a splendid one to behold
As for stock engines, I'm going to vote for the 460. They were built tough and with plenty of torque right outta the box. The Bigfoot trucks all have 460 based engines with a header design to emphasize and enhance the torque. That's why they can wheelie from a standing start so much easier than any of the competition. The only other competition that I'm aware of is the Dodge Bearfoot and I gotta admit that it's engine had some good snort when I saw it perform live, here in the big city of Kalispell. Then there's also Gravedigger...a short wheelbase that can also wheelie without a 2nd thought.

I'm still voting for the 460 as the best stock engine, for durability and torque right from the factory.
__________________

Dick
'99 NASCAR Edition F-150-4X4
Praise the Lord!!
John 3:16
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 02-25-2005, 08:48 PM
vman vman is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: brimfield township,OH
Posts: 639
vman is starting off with a positive reputation.
I kinda like them all.The 454 and 460 are alot alike. The 440 is more like a big small block chevy. I would have to tip my hat to the 440. It has a big bore and short stroke. It will rev faster and have less wear.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 02-25-2005, 08:50 PM
FRECSF FRECSF is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 184
FRECSF is starting off with a positive reputation.
A very good friend of mine builds all of gravediggers engines and that is no stock 454. He does about two a season.

I have seen big block shootouts between all three and I have to say that they are all very compairable in stock trim.

The 440 with the better rod ratio is the better torque engine out of this group. The Pontiac or Buick 455 would be more or less close too the same torque as the 440.

I have a magazine article with a big block shoot out and the 460 didn't to well. But then again, I believe the 460 won in the Popular Hotrods Challange so it maybe more up to the builder.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 02-25-2005, 10:24 PM
DOHCmarauder's Avatar
DOHCmarauder DOHCmarauder is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 4,074
DOHCmarauder has a great reputation on FTE. DOHCmarauder has a great reputation on FTE. DOHCmarauder has a great reputation on FTE. DOHCmarauder has a great reputation on FTE. DOHCmarauder has a great reputation on FTE.
On paper the 460 is the most oversquare(4.36X3.85) in theory could rev the highest.

The 454 should have the most torque with its 4" stroke(4.250X4")

The 440 could be a revver also @(4.32X3.75) but its inline valves could hinder ultimate breathing at higher revs.

The 460 and 454 have the more high performance canted valve heads IMHO.

The 460 is also dimensionally larger making a 514" stroker EZ. (I know GM has a 496 which is basically a stroked 454 but anything larger needs a siamesed block,502, or a tall deck.


I think it was a John Kaase motor(?) (460 Ford) that won the PH shootout this year.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 02-25-2005, 10:33 PM
bassdude bassdude is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: colorado
Posts: 606
bassdude is starting off with a positive reputation.
on a practical note i think 460's win hands down. 454's may have had more units produced but they're pretty scarce around here. i saw two 460's in our local pick a part last weekend. didn't see any big Chevy's. and thats the way it almost always is. what good is a motor if you can't find one, and then be able to afford it. 440's are great but they're even more scarce than the Chevy's . of coarse I'm talking about my region can't say about the rest of the country.
there have been a couple of 440 builders in the paper here and they were asking $500 bucks for a worn out long block. i can go down to the junkyard today and come home with a worn out 460 for $75.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 02-26-2005, 12:09 AM
tmyers's Avatar
tmyers tmyers is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Everett, Wa
Posts: 2,404
tmyers has a good reputation on FTE. tmyers has a good reputation on FTE.
I would also vote for the 460. It is much more capable of putting power out than the others and it can be done as cheap as the 454 and way cheaper than the 440. Concerning availability I would imagine that there are as many if not more 460's or 429's out there than 454's. The only differnece between the 429 and 460 is pistons and crank otherwise they are the same. The 429 if I'm not mistaken is still in production today for comercial use.

Looking at stroker capabilities the 460 wins hands down in anything approaching affordability. The following are prices and capabilities from a reputable company:

Using stock block
440 - 542ci - $3300
454 - 524ci - $2150
460 - 557ci - $2200

Using aftermarket blocks:
440 - nothing avaiable
454 - 638ci - $2000
460 - 806ci - $2669

Now someone mentioned John Kaase. He did win the 2003 Big Block Shootout and I'm a firm believer that this has more to do with the builder than the engine. John also won the 2004 small block shootout with a Ford.
__________________
Terry
02 Ranger Edge 4x4, 4.0
05 Mustang GT
06 C6 Corvette
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 02-26-2005, 09:51 AM
cleatus12r's Avatar
cleatus12r cleatus12r is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Reed Point, MT
Posts: 2,080
cleatus12r has a great reputation on FTE. cleatus12r has a great reputation on FTE. cleatus12r has a great reputation on FTE. cleatus12r has a great reputation on FTE. cleatus12r has a great reputation on FTE.
460 Cons:
Short stroke...should have been a little more 'square'.
Terrible exhaust ports...factory SBC exhaust flows better.
Only 10 head bolts per side...should have taken a lesson from the General.
It's a Ford so swaps are a pain

454 Cons:
Ever seen a Gen III or IV that DIDN'T burn oil?
Weak factory bottom end (Rod chuckers at high revs)
Kinda scarce as far as finding a good rebuildable core go.

440 Cons:
Rare
Inline valves
TINY exhaust ports
Again, short stroke.


460 Pros:
Aftermarket parts availability...BIG INCHES FOR LESS $$$$
Bottom end is hell-for-stout (can do the same with 2 bolt mains that chebby does with 4...that's what you get for using big bolts)
Run well and don't burn oil (within reason)

454 Pros:
By far the most aftermarket support
VERY powerful from the factory
Doesn't need any port work on the exhaust side.
Oil companies love them

440 Pros:
.......um....
and...
nevermind.



Cody
__________________
Cody

Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 02-26-2005, 01:46 PM
FRECSF FRECSF is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 184
FRECSF is starting off with a positive reputation.
460 Pro:
Affordable parts
Good bore/stroke ratio
Largest CID

460 Cons:
Standard passenger car rods
Poor Valvetrain Geometry when decking blocks
Weak Distirbutor to oil pump driveshaft
Large Main bearings need high volume oil pump

454 Pro:
Large bore and large valves
Good bottom end and oiling
Easy to build and tune
Parts easy to get

454 Cons:
Poor rod ratio

440 Pro:
Good HP/CI
Very Large bores reduces valve shrouding
Short Stroke reduces piston speed
High block deck height
Highest Rod Ratio
Externally mounted oil pump
No coolant flows thru intake manifold
Easy to work on
Bullet proof shaft mounted rockers
High nickel blocks
Most Pre-74 have all forged internals

440 Cons:
Heavy internal rotating mass
Performance parts are slim
Expensive

Question? Has the 460 ever proved to be a performance engine on the street? I know that 454, 455 and 440's were all part of the muscle car era, but did Ford ever produce a performance vehical with the 460?
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 02-26-2005, 02:29 PM
tmyers's Avatar
tmyers tmyers is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Everett, Wa
Posts: 2,404
tmyers has a good reputation on FTE. tmyers has a good reputation on FTE.
No, but the 429 did and its the same other than crank and pistons. Meaning that the Boss Hemi heads bolt up.
__________________
Terry
02 Ranger Edge 4x4, 4.0
05 Mustang GT
06 C6 Corvette
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 02-26-2005, 07:34 PM
stevef100s stevef100s is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Destin/Ft. Walton Beach,
Posts: 1,096
stevef100s is new and has a neutral reputation at this point.
I've owned all three. Performance wise, the 440 wins hands down. The question was which is the best. Not which is the easiest to find, or whatever. To me, faster is better. This is speaking in stock form of course. Not modded in any way. Somebody will try to bring up the special 1 or 2 year 454 with aluminum heads, but that was a low production engine. Then there's the 440 magnum with a 6-pack, and the model with 2 4-barrel carbs. No doubt in my mind. I'm a Ford guy, but I've never had a stock 460 that was faster then a stock 440.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 02-26-2005, 09:47 PM
tmyers's Avatar
tmyers tmyers is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Everett, Wa
Posts: 2,404
tmyers has a good reputation on FTE. tmyers has a good reputation on FTE.
That is true the 460 was never used in any stock performance application.
__________________
Terry
02 Ranger Edge 4x4, 4.0
05 Mustang GT
06 C6 Corvette
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
440 , 454 , 460 , chev , chevy , crate , dodge , engine , engines , ford , heads , horsepower , torque , truck , vrs

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:21 AM.

Guidelines - Contact Us - Ford Truck Enthusiasts - Archive - Top

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 1997-2008 Internet Brands, Inc.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.