Ford vs The Competition Technical discussion and comparison ONLY. Trolls will not be tolerated.

GM to drop Quadrasteer

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 02-15-2005, 08:02 PM
Paul Selby's Avatar
Paul Selby
Paul Selby is offline
Junior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
GM to drop Quadrasteer

Did anyone not see this coming?

http://www.mlive.com/business/fljour...8452033850.xml
 
  #2  
Old 02-15-2005, 09:25 PM
IB Tim's Avatar
IB Tim
IB Tim is offline
Site Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: 3rd Rock
Posts: 161,998
Received 58 Likes on 30 Posts
My understanding...it never took off...I had heard last year it was gone...guess it is for real now
 
  #3  
Old 02-16-2005, 05:39 AM
MrOldV8's Avatar
MrOldV8
MrOldV8 is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: SouthWest Ohio
Posts: 916
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nobody is going to miss it.

MR
 
  #4  
Old 02-16-2005, 07:01 AM
150ford's Avatar
150ford
150ford is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: nebraska
Posts: 5,378
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
They only sold 5500 trucks with it. Thats a small percentage way less then 1 percent.
 
  #5  
Old 02-16-2005, 07:39 AM
IB Tim's Avatar
IB Tim
IB Tim is offline
Site Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: 3rd Rock
Posts: 161,998
Received 58 Likes on 30 Posts
I wonder what the development cost were, had to be tremendous, given it was new for that chassis
 
  #6  
Old 02-16-2005, 08:33 AM
bigbluebronco43's Avatar
bigbluebronco43
bigbluebronco43 is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Norwood USA
Posts: 790
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thats really too bad. It was a great idea that could've taken off into all trucks and been a big help, but oh well.
 
  #7  
Old 02-16-2005, 09:53 AM
AG4.0's Avatar
AG4.0
AG4.0 is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: May 2003
Location: York, NE
Posts: 1,211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think if they would have made it an option by itself from the beginning, instead of including it in an expensive package, then it might have had a better chance. It is too bad to see it go as it was a good idea and I've heard mostly good things about it, except for when it needs to be aligned.
 
  #8  
Old 02-16-2005, 10:01 AM
osbornk's Avatar
osbornk
osbornk is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Marion, VA
Posts: 2,511
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you recall, I think Honda did it first and it didn't work for them either. I think you can still get it on some lawn mowers though.
 
  #9  
Old 02-16-2005, 10:16 AM
150ford's Avatar
150ford
150ford is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: nebraska
Posts: 5,378
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Was that option available on the HD trucks?. Its my understanding it was just available on the half tons.
 
  #10  
Old 02-16-2005, 10:49 AM
bigbluebronco43's Avatar
bigbluebronco43
bigbluebronco43 is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Norwood USA
Posts: 790
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just 1/2 tons. And they introduced it completely wrong by having it cost so much as an option, on top of only having it as an option on the more expensive trucks.
 
  #11  
Old 02-16-2005, 03:28 PM
polarbear's Avatar
polarbear
polarbear is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Damascus-Boring, Ore
Posts: 10,728
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No, it was offered on 1/2 tons and 8600-lb GVR 3/4 tons. The major clinker in the 3/4's was no availability with a Duramax or a big Block, which really limits the appeal of that option to the towing crowd. Naturally, that's the group of buyers that had the most benefit from it.

I also see Chebbie offering the SS in a 2WD version. We seem to be bumping up on the outer limits of what customers are willing to pay for a pickup. I was wondering when that would happen.
 
  #12  
Old 02-16-2005, 04:55 PM
superrangerman2002's Avatar
superrangerman2002
superrangerman2002 is offline
Logistics Pro
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 4,816
Received 17 Likes on 15 Posts
I think that the Quadrasteer is a example of too much technology, too soon...Hence the extra $$$.

I would tend to agree with GM that the market was ready for something like this, but I would argue that the QS should be available across the board in all frill levels.

I also would bet that GM was hoping for QS to get some wings right away, but soon found out that it wasn't as popular as once thought. Then in a panic they tried to recover R+D in a inflated QS cost. Which ultimately lead to it's demise.

In reality, they shouldn't have tested the waters with thier toes, just jumped in instead.
 

Last edited by superrangerman2002; 02-16-2005 at 05:05 PM.
  #13  
Old 02-16-2005, 05:01 PM
jeb's Avatar
jeb
jeb is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 874
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by polarbear
No, it was offered on 1/2 tons and 8600-lb GVR 3/4 tons. The major clinker in the 3/4's was no availability with a Duramax or a big Block, which really limits the appeal of that option to the towing crowd. Naturally, that's the group of buyers that had the most benefit from it.
I think you nailed it. They marketed it at the towing crowd and then didn't offer it on the real towing trucks in the GM lineup, the HD2500/3500. Sad to see it go but I'm glad I got one while it was available.
 
  #14  
Old 02-16-2005, 05:19 PM
IB Tim's Avatar
IB Tim
IB Tim is offline
Site Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: 3rd Rock
Posts: 161,998
Received 58 Likes on 30 Posts
I would tend to agree with GM that the market was ready for something like this, but I would argue that the QS should be available across the board in all frill levels.
Excellent point and one that would have easly allowed for a longer run in the market to see if was.... a viable option.
 
  #15  
Old 02-16-2005, 05:42 PM
captchas's Avatar
captchas
captchas is offline
Guest
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: north west new jersey
Posts: 7,988
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
wonder how many where buy backs? .
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:26 AM.