1999 to 2016 Super Duty 1999 to 2016 Ford F250, F350, F450 and F550 Super Duty with diesel V8 and gas V8 and V10 engines
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Gas Mileage for Triton V10 (1999 F250)

  #16  
Old 01-23-2012, 02:30 PM
B&LLandscaping's Avatar
B&LLandscaping
B&LLandscaping is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Posts: 322
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I think some of thses MPG numbers must be in "2005 mpgs", because I sure don't get anywhere near that with my '02 V10.
 
  #17  
Old 02-05-2012, 11:37 PM
debauchee1's Avatar
debauchee1
debauchee1 is offline
New User
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
V10 fuel usage/vs power

I wasn't satisfied with the hp in my 2003 S-Cab with the V10 so I took the wrenches to it. Before the work I was getting between 12 & 13 on the highway & 10 to 11 in town. Except when pulling a trailer, the load factor didn't seem to affect the mileage much.

For starters I added a larger cold-air intake and short-tube headers matched up to a better less restrictive exhaust. Then I chipped the ignition. These mods brought my hp up to 425 @ 4500 RPM with 418 ft. pounds of torque as dynoed. Oddly enough, my fuel consumption is slightly improved as long as I only use the amount of throttle setting needed to get the job done. Highway use is 14 to 15 now but the in-town is still about 11. Fully loaded I now get between 9 & 10.

One of the big concerns I had before I started this project was over the strength of the drive train; would it be able to handle the increased hp. I'm happy to report no problems and I've not noticed any increase in tranny temp under a load.

I can only compare what I've done to what I see with similar trucks with a diesel and mine will walk away from them full loaded. Before the work it was fairly equal. One other note: The V10 is a lighter engine than the heavier diesel block so you're not pushing unnecessary weight down the road. That gives the front-end a lighter feel on handling. The diesel trucks seem to be "heavy" on the steering.
 
  #18  
Old 02-06-2012, 03:01 AM
Strokin-A-2010's Avatar
Strokin-A-2010
Strokin-A-2010 is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,237
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
How do these people come up with threads that are 7 years old? I guess they do use the search function. LMAO
 
  #19  
Old 02-06-2012, 12:18 PM
ArrizX's Avatar
ArrizX
ArrizX is offline
Senior User
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I just pulled ALMOST 11.5 with my v10 the other day. I was so stoked.
 
  #20  
Old 02-06-2012, 12:35 PM
dkf's Avatar
dkf
dkf is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Pa
Posts: 10,101
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 17 Posts
Originally Posted by debauchee1
I wasn't satisfied with the hp in my 2003 S-Cab with the V10 so I took the wrenches to it. Before the work I was getting between 12 & 13 on the highway & 10 to 11 in town. Except when pulling a trailer, the load factor didn't seem to affect the mileage much.

For starters I added a larger cold-air intake and short-tube headers matched up to a better less restrictive exhaust. Then I chipped the ignition. These mods brought my hp up to 425 @ 4500 RPM with 418 ft. pounds of torque as dynoed. Oddly enough, my fuel consumption is slightly improved as long as I only use the amount of throttle setting needed to get the job done. Highway use is 14 to 15 now but the in-town is still about 11. Fully loaded I now get between 9 & 10.

One of the big concerns I had before I started this project was over the strength of the drive train; would it be able to handle the increased hp. I'm happy to report no problems and I've not noticed any increase in tranny temp under a load.

I can only compare what I've done to what I see with similar trucks with a diesel and mine will walk away from them full loaded. Before the work it was fairly equal. One other note: The V10 is a lighter engine than the heavier diesel block so you're not pushing unnecessary weight down the road. That gives the front-end a lighter feel on handling. The diesel trucks seem to be "heavy" on the steering.
There is no way in hell your going see 425hp out of that V10 with just an intake, exhaust, set of shorties and a "chipped ignition"(whatever that is supposed to be) And if those are chassis dyno numbers you are not going to see 418tq at the wheels either with those mods. Only chance you have of getting close to those numbers at the wheels is a healthy amount of boost which will eventually make the stock rods say uncle.

How do these people come up with threads that are 7 years old? I guess they do use the search function. LMAO
I didn't even notice that before. I've seen resurected posts from 2001 lately. People must do searches on the net and decide to add their $.02.
 
  #21  
Old 02-06-2012, 03:22 PM
WestxSRT10's Avatar
WestxSRT10
WestxSRT10 is offline
Elder User
Join Date: May 2008
Location: SW Idaho
Posts: 574
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by dkf
There is no way in hell your going see 425hp out of that V10 with just an intake, exhaust, set of shorties and a "chipped ignition"(whatever that is supposed to be) And if those are chassis dyno numbers you are not going to see 418tq at the wheels either with those mods. Only chance you have of getting close to those numbers at the wheels is a healthy amount of boost which will eventually make the stock rods say uncle.



I didn't even notice that before. I've seen resurected posts from 2001 lately. People must do searches on the net and decide to add their $.02.
I think he meant to say 325 rwhp?... (still no way on a 03)
 
  #22  
Old 02-06-2012, 04:48 PM
Archer379's Avatar
Archer379
Archer379 is offline
Freshman User
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well yesterday I towed a small trailer witha snowmobile and I was getting 12 mpg would have been more but spent a hour idling while we pushed a car up the hill the rd was a sheet of ice then I was spinning pretty good until I made almost to the top then had to get a dodge to pull it the rest of they way so that used a bit extra fuel. The truck is a 04 supercab v10 2wheel drive
 
  #23  
Old 02-06-2012, 06:58 PM
VONxRUBENxLA's Avatar
VONxRUBENxLA
VONxRUBENxLA is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 930
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ArrizX
circa 2005 thread .
I guess nothing ever gets lost on here. Lol
 
  #24  
Old 03-05-2012, 12:30 PM
Beetles's Avatar
Beetles
Beetles is offline
New User
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Smile 30 Ft Class B+ Motorhome with Triton V10 WDYT?

We had a 1991 28 ft, class A with a 454 and while it got 13MPG (with a good tailwind, going down a 6% grade) it was entirely gutless in the mountains. It was a 3/4 ton chassis but don't remember its GVWR. We are thinking of buying a Lexington 30 Ft Class B+ (that's the new model with the half overhang and full cab) at about 12,000 +/- GVWR - any body have any comment about the V10 engine's pulling power? I'm not so worried about gas mileage as you can't expect much in a motorhome anyway but if the man doesn't have power we will be looking to spend the mega extra bucks on the big "D" and they are real rare in B or C class motorhomes! Help?

Private response: vickster54@ymail.com
 
  #25  
Old 03-06-2012, 11:09 AM
mjc3276's Avatar
mjc3276
mjc3276 is offline
Junior User
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Manassas Park, VA
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Im getting 13 @ 70 mph. Also- before I changed the ignition coils- I was down to 7.5 on the highway.
 
  #26  
Old 03-06-2012, 05:43 PM
Madbasser's Avatar
Madbasser
Madbasser is offline
Junior User
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by VONxRUBENxLA
I guess nothing ever gets lost on here. Lol
It returns
 
  #27  
Old 03-07-2012, 03:05 PM
Beetles's Avatar
Beetles
Beetles is offline
New User
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hmm, my bad, the class B motorhome we are looking at is a 2009 Triton V10 and I'm hoping that its gas mileage and power is better than the '91 454. The "man" is still very worried about the '99 triton being gutless and I WON'T go back to 2 x 60 air!
 
  #28  
Old 03-07-2012, 03:40 PM
mjc3276's Avatar
mjc3276
mjc3276 is offline
Junior User
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Manassas Park, VA
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The V10 will haul a load without much problem. reguardless, to help with the power and a bit on the gas mileage, 5 Star tuning has a program for the V10 that adjust the tranny and tunes the engine for towing/ economy/ ect. That will help firm up any sluggish response you find. The V10 is an outstanding engine.
 
  #29  
Old 03-07-2012, 05:31 PM
barthel's Avatar
barthel
barthel is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Anaheim, PRK
Posts: 988
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Beetles
The "man" is still very worried about the '99 triton being gutless and I WON'T go back to 2 x 60 air!
The V-10 is FAR from gutless. Gas mileage sucks (I average 7.5mpg towing my TH, but I'm lifted and run 315's) but I didn't buy it 'cuz it was good on gas, I bought it 'cuz it pulls like a 40 mule team! Decent mileage on a motorhome or a tow vehicle is a misnomer anyway.

It loves to rev (I routinely push mine past 4500rpm's on steep climbs) and has power to spare. A 5Star tune is never a bad idea, I love mine. I had an MH with an older Mark IV 454, it wasn't anywhere near as good as the Triton V-10.
 
  #30  
Old 03-07-2012, 06:08 PM
Deluxe05's Avatar
Deluxe05
Deluxe05 is offline
Posting Guru

Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Denver, Co
Posts: 1,617
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Not only did a ~7 year old thread get revived, but the OP only had a single post. He probably bought an Avalanche or a Toyoter and never came back.



This just goes to prove that forum threads rarely die. They simply lie in wait, regaining strength for their triumphant come back.
 

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Gas Mileage for Triton V10 (1999 F250)



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:54 AM.