Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Performance, Engines & Troubleshooting > Other Ford Engines > 4 Cylinder Engines
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?


Reply
 
 
 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 10-27-2004, 12:51 AM
knoxnil knoxnil is offline
Freshman User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: NW IL
Posts: 30
knoxnil is starting off with a positive reputation.
HP rating on the 2.3

I am thinking about trading my '99 XLT w/2.5 (which is only rated @ 119 hp, I believe). Was going to go with the 3.0 V-6 until I looked up the engine specs. on Fords Web site. The '05 2.3 is rated @ 143 hp and the 3.0 is @ 148. I guess I need to test drive them to see for sure but 143-119=24, that seem a big difference for a little 4-banger. Who's got some experience to share on this?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-27-2004, 01:11 AM
knoxnil knoxnil is offline
Freshman User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: NW IL
Posts: 30
knoxnil is starting off with a positive reputation.
How about the fact that it (the 2.3) is an all Aluminum Engine as opposed to the Cast Iron 3.0. Is that a good thing?? The mileage ratings are pretty impressive for the 2.3 but do you have to hang some John Deere tractor weights on the front end to keep it on the ground with that light (aluminum) engine??
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-27-2004, 09:57 AM
dwildmanj dwildmanj is offline
Junior User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Stone Mountain, GA
Posts: 96
dwildmanj is starting off with a positive reputation.
What year did the 2.3 become an aluminum engine? I didn't realize that it was now aluminum.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-27-2004, 02:05 PM
knoxnil knoxnil is offline
Freshman User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: NW IL
Posts: 30
knoxnil is starting off with a positive reputation.
Don't know when but according to http://www.fordvehicles.com/trucks/r...eatures/specs/ the 2.3 has an Alum. block and Alum head, whereas the 3.0 has a Cast Iron block and Cast Iron head, while the 4.0 has a Cast Iron block and an Alum. head. Other than lighter weight what is the advantage for/against Alum.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-27-2004, 03:20 PM
RangerX's Avatar
RangerX RangerX is offline
New User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: PA,
Posts: 18
RangerX is starting off with a positive reputation.
the new ones are, the old ones are not...
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-28-2004, 11:02 PM
mostlybogeys mostlybogeys is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Bixby, OK
Posts: 5
mostlybogeys is starting off with a positive reputation.
knoxnil -

Don't know anything about aluminum v. cast iron. I have an '03 Ranger with the 2.3L Duratech and 5 speed manual. We have also have a '96 Taurus with 3.0L V6 auto. I much prefer the 2.3 in my Ranger. Performance is about the same as the V6 but the gas mileage around town is about 5 mpg better (2 - 3 mpg better on the highway). If you're not going to be pulling anything, the 2.3 is great for running around in and light hauling. If you need more power, go with the 4.0 not the 3.0 but, from what I've read elsewhere on this board, say bye to great gas mileage.
Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2004, 11:02 PM
 
 
 
Reply


Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Performance, Engines & Troubleshooting > Other Ford Engines > 4 Cylinder Engines

Tags
23, cast, cheap, ford, head, horsepower, hp, iron, ltr, raitings, rateings, rating, ratings

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump


Participate In The Forums

Create new posts and participate in discussions. It's free!

Sign Up »





All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 AC1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Statement - Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.

vbulletin Admin Backup